Mr Hoefner, Mr Elser, Please Welcome to Poland. Some Comments on the Polish Healthcare System Reform from the Perspective of State Aid Law

• Authors: Łukasz Grzejdziak
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The purpose of this paper is to verify the hypothesis that a debt write-off implemented recently by Polish authorities in favour of public hospitals constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union. The paper contains a detailed description of the nature of the measure – its historical background, regulatory context, as well as its construction. It presents an in-depth analysis of the fulfilment by the measure of the conditions stipulated in Article 107(1) TFEU. As a preliminary issue, the analysis addresses the problem whether Polish public hospitals can be considered as undertakings within the meaning of EU competition law, particularly, as to their activity financed by the sickness fund organized under the principle of social solidarity. The answer to this question seems to be affirmative and in line with the landmark Hoefner and Elser judgments where the ECJ held that the way in which an entity is financed is irrelevant for its classification as an undertaking. The paper argues in favour of the thesis that the debt write-off must be considered as affecting trade between Member States and competition. Consequently, and contrary to the official position of the Polish government, the measure in question is classified as State aid.

FR

Le but de cet article est de vérifier l’hypothèse selon laquelle l’amortissement total des dettes effectué récemment par les autorités polonaises en faveur des hôpitaux publiques constitue une aide publique au sens de l’Article 107(1) TFUE. L’article contient une description détaillée de la nature de cette mesure – son histoire, contexte législatif aussi que sa construction. Il présent une analyse profonde de l’accomplissement par cette mesure des conditions indiquées par l’Article 107(1) TFUE. Comme question préliminaire, l’analyse a pour objectif de vérifier si les hôpitaux publiques polonais peuvent être considérés comme entreprises au sens de la loi de concurrence de l’EU par rapport à son activité financée par le fonds de maladie organisé en accord avec le príncipe de la solidarité sociale.

Keywords

EN

Poland; healthcare services; hospital services; state aid; notion of state aid; write-off of the debts of an undertaking; notion of undertaking in the EU competition law; public undertakings; social solidarity; cross-subsidization; effect on trade between Member States; adverse effect on competition; notification of state aid; services of general economic interest

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 4(5)
• Pages: 85-109

Dates

published

2011-11-30

Contributors

author

Łukasz Grzejdziak

• Chair of Public Economic Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Łódź

References

• Baquero Cruz J., ‘Service of General Interest and EC Law’ [in:] G. De Burca (ed.), EU Law and the Welfare State: In Search of Solidarity, Oxford 2005.
• Baudenbacher C., A Brief Guide to European State Aid Law, The Hague 1997.
• Boeger N., ‘Solidarity and EC Competition Law’ (2007) 32(3) E.L. Rev.
• Braun J.-D., Kühling J., ‘Article 87 EC and the Community Courts: from Revolution to Evolution’ (2008) 45 C.M.L. Rev.
• Buendia-Sierra J. L., Exclusive Rights and State Monopolies under EC Law, Oxford 1999.
• Dudzik S., Pomoc państwa dla przedsiębiorców publicznych w prawie Wspólnoty Europejskiej. Między neutralnością a zaangażowaniem, Kraków 2002.
• Evans A., European Community Law of State Aid, Oxford 1997.
• Gronden J. W. van de, ‘Financing Health Care in EU Law: Do the European State Aid Rules Write Out an Effective Prescription for Integrating Competition Law with Health Care?’ (2009) 6(1) The Competition Law Review.
• Hancher L., ‘Towards a New Definition of a State Aid under European Law: Is there a New Concept of State Aid Emerging?’ (2003) 3 EStAL.
• Hatzopoulos V., ‘Killing National Health and Insurance Systems but Healing Patients? The European Market for Health Care Services after the Judgments of the ECJ in Vanbraekel and Peerbooms’ (2002) 39 C.M.L.Rev.
• Kleis M., Nicolaides P., ‘The Concept of Undertaking in Education and Public Health Systems’ (2006) 3 EStAL.
• Koenig Ch., Paul J., ‘State Aid Screening of Hospital Funding Exemplified by the German Case’ (2010) 4 EstAL.
• Krajewski M., Farley M., ‘Limited Competition in National Health Systems and the Application of Competition Law: The AOK Bundesverband Case’ (2004) 29(6) E.L. Rev.
• Krajewski M., Farley M., ‘Non-Economic Activities in Upstream and Downstream Markets and the Scope of Competition Law After Fenin’ (2007) 32(1) E.L. Rev.
• Odudu O., ‘Are State-owned health-care providers undertakings subject to competition law?’ (2011) 5 E.C.L.R.
• Postuła I., Werner A., Pomoc państwa [State Aid], Warszawa 2006.
• Prosser T., The Limits of Competition Law. Public Service and EC Law, Oxford 2005.
• Schohe G., Arholdt C., ‘The Case-Law of the European Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance on State Aids in 2002/2003’ (2003) 2 EstAL.
• Szyszczak E., ‘Modernising Healthcare: Pilgrimage for the Holy Grail’ [in:] Krajewski M., Neergaard U., Van de Gronden J. W. (eds), The Changing Legal Framework for Services of General Interest in Europe, The Hague 2009.
• Temple Lang J., ‘Privatisation of Social Welfare: European Union Competition Law Rules’ [in:] Dougan M., Spaventa E. (eds.), Social Welfare and EU Law: Essays in European Law, Oxford 2005.
• Willemot B., ‘Assessment of an Aid granted under the Form of a Debt Waiver. Note on case T-217/02 Ter Lembeek International NV v. the Commission’ (2007) 2 EstAL.