The 2014 European Parliamentary Elections in Slovenia: Hardly and Novelty

• Authors: Alenka Krašovec , Tomaž Deželan
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the article the main characteristics of the European Parliament elections in 2014 in relation to the characteristics of the both previous elections to the Parliament were analysed. First, the legal framework is presented, followed by the presentation of candidate lists. As it is frequently the case, the authors for the analysis employed the analytical framework presented by Reif and Schmitt (1980). Following the framework, it is obvious the elections in Slovenia again demonstrated many elements of the second-order elections framework, for example in terms of the turnout, success of the governmental parties, success of small parties, as well as almost complete absence of party programmes, Euroscepticism and European topics in the campaign. Since several important domestic events happened just before the EP elections (e.g. resignation of the government at the beginning of May and the fact the leader of the biggest opposition party was by the court found guilty of corruption activity and sent to the prison at the end of April) such developments did not come as a big surprise.

Keywords

EN

Slovenia; European Parliament; elections; Euroscepticism

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Śląski. Wydział Nauk Społecznych
• Journal: Political Preferences
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 9
• Pages: 77-96

Contributors

author

Alenka Krašovec

• University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

author

Tomaž Deželan

• University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

References

• Cabada L. (2010), Volitve v Evropski parlament kot drugorazredne volitve: refleksija volitev v novih srednjeevropskih članicah Evropske unije, [in:] A. Krašovec (ed.), Volitve v Evropski parlament 2009, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Clark N., Rohrschneider R. (2009), Second-Order Elections versus First-Order Thinking: How Voters Perceive the Representation Process in a Multi-Layered System of Governance, „Journal of European Integration”, vol. 31(5): 645-664.
• Deželan T. (2005), Z “Eurobusom” po Sloveniji, [in:] S. Kustec Lipicer (ed.), Politološki vidiki volilne kampanje, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Fink-Hafner D. (2001), Politične stranke, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Fink-Hafner D. (2006), Slovenia: Between Bipolarity and Broad Coalition-Building, [in:] S.Jungerstam-Mulders (ed.), Post-communist EU Member States: Parties and Party Systems, Burlington: Ashgate, Aldershot.
• Fink-Hafner D. (2012), Značilnosti razvoja strankarskega sistema v Sloveniji, [in:] J. Prunk, T. Deželan (eds.), Dvajset let slovenske države, Maribor: Aristej.
• Fink-Hafner D., Krašovec A. (2013), Factors Affecting the Long-Term Success of New Parliamentary Parties: Findings in a Post-Communist Context, „Romanian Journal of Political Science”, vol. 13(2): 40-68.
• Hacler T. (2014), 92 Slovencev želi, da jih pošljemo v Bruselj, http://www.rtvslo.si/evropska-unija/evropske-volitve-2014/92-slovencev-zeli-da-jih-posljemo-v-bruselj/335598 (18.08.2014).
• Haughton T. (2009), Driver, Conductor or Fellow Passenger? EU Membership and Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe, „Communist Studies and Transition Politics”, vol. 25(4): 413-426.
• Haughton T., Deegan-Krause K. (2010), Hardy Perennials. Parties Which Buck the “Live Fast, Die Young” Norm in Central and Eastern Europe, Paper prepared for “ECPR Joint Session”, St Gallen, 12-17 April 2010.
• Haughton T., Krašovec A. (2013), The 2011 Parliamentary Elections in Slovenia, „Electoral Studies”, vol. 32(1): 201-204.
• Haughton T., Krašovec A. (2014), Are European elections ever about Europe?, „The Washington Post (Online edition)”, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkeycage/wp/2014/05/23/european-parliamentary-elections-slovenia/ (11.08.2014).
• Koepke J. R., Ringe Nils (2006), The Second-Order Election Model in an Enlarged Europe, „European Union Politics”, vol. 7(3): 321-346.
• Krašovec A. (2005), Financiranje volilnih kampanj: Primerjava med volilno kampanjo za volitve v nacionalni in v Evropski parlament, [in:] S. Kustec Lipicer (ed.), Politološki vidiki volilne kampanje, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Krašovec A. ed. (2005), Volitve v Evropski parlament: Res drugorazredne volitve?, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Krašovec A. ed. (2010), Volitve v Evropski parlament 2009, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Krašovec A. (2013), Paradoxes in Development of Democracy in Slovenia or Just an Ordinary Story of Disillusionment?, Paper presented at the “18th CEPSA Conference”, Plzen, 24-26 October 2013.
• Krašovec A., Lajh D. (2009), The European Union: A Joker or Just an Ordinary Playing Card for Slovenian Political Parties?, „Communist Studies and Transition Politics”, vol. 25 (4): 491-512.
• Krašovec A., Lajh D. (2010), Slovenia, [in:] J. Lodge (eds.), The 2009 Elections to the European Parliament, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Krašovec A., Cabada L. (2013), Kako smo si različni: značilnosti vladnih koalicij v Sloveniji, Češki republiki in na Slovaškem, „Teorija in praksa”, vol. 50 (5/6): 717-735.
• Krašovec A., Malčič M. (2014), Business as Usual: Characteristics of the European Parliament Elections in Slovenia and Slovenian Members’ Activities in the European Parliament, „Studia Historica Slovenica”, forthcoming.
• Kustec Lipicer S. (2005), Politološki vidiki volilne kampanje, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Kustec Lipicer S., Bilavčič N. (2010), Volilni programi in volilne vsebine skozi izkušnjo volitev v Evropski parlament 2009, [in:] S. Kustec Lipicer (ed.), Politične vsebine in volilna kampanja, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Ladrech R. (2002), Europeanization and Political Parties: Towards a Framework for Analysis, „Party Politics”, vol. 8(4): 389-403.
• Lewis G. P. ed., (2001), Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe – The First Decade, London and Portland: Frank Cass & Co Ltd.
• Lewis G. P., Mansfeldova Z. eds. (2006), The European Union and Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
• Lewis G. P., Markowski R. eds. (2011), Europeanising Party Politics?, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Lodge J. (2010), Irrelevant and Obsolete? The Euroepan Parliament and Voters in Perspective, [in:] J. Lodge (ed.), The 2009 Elections to the European Parliament, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Mair P. (2000), The Limited Impact of Europe on National Party Systems, „West European Politics”, vol. 23(4): 7-15.
• Merz N., Regel S. (2013), What are Manifestos for? Selecting and Typing Documents for the Database, [in:] A. Volkens, J. Bara, I. Budge, M. D. McDonald (eds.), Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts: Statistical Solutions for Manifesto Analysts, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Politbarometer (2005), Raziskava javnega mnenja 12/2005. Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja, http://www.cjm.si/sites/cjm.si/files/old_pb/pb12_05.pdf (20.08.2014).
• Politbarometer (2011), Raziskava javnega mnenja 10/2011. Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja, http://www.cjm.si/sites/cjm.si/files/file/raziskava_pb/PB10-11.pdf (20.08.2014)
• Politbarometer (2013), Raziskava javnega mnenja 6/2013. Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja,http://www.cjm.si/sites/cjm.si/files/file/aktualne_raziskave/PB6_13.pdf (20.08.2014).
• Prunk J. (2011), Usoda socialne demokracije v razvoju samostojne Slovenije, Paper presented on the International Scientific Symposium “Osamosvojitev Slovenije – med pričakovanji in realnostjo (1991 – 2011)”, Maribor, 26-28 October 2011.
• Raunio T. (2002), Party-Electoral Linkage, [in:] K. M. Johansson, P. Zervakis (eds.), European Political Parties between Cooperation and Integration, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
• Reif K., Schmitt H. (1980), Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results, „European Journal of Political Research”, vol. 8(1): 3-44.
• Seoane Perez F., Lodge J. (2010), Framing and Salience of Issues in 2009 Euroepan Elections, [in:] J. Lodge (ed.), The 2009 Elections to the European Parliament, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Stanojević M., Krašovec A. (2011), Slovenia: Social Pacts and Political Exchange, [in:] S. Avdagić, M. Rhodes, J. Visser (eds.), Social Pacts In Europe: Emergence, Evolution, and Institutionalization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Šabič Z. et al. (2014), Slovenia: TEPSA Report on the 2014 EP Election Campaign in the Member States: National Debates, European Elections, Brussels, June 2014.
• Szczerbiak A. and Taggart P. eds. (2008), Opposing Europe: The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Taggart P. and Szczerbiak A. (2001), Parties, Positions and Europe: Euroscepticism in the EU Candidate States of Central and Eastern Europe, Paper presented at the “Annual Conference of the Political 41 Studies Association of the United Kingdom”, Manchester, 10-12 April 2001.
• Topolinjak S. (2010), Značilnosti kandidatnih list in izvoljenih na volitvah v Evropski parlament: primerjava 2004-2009, [in:] A. Krašovec (ed.), Volitve v Evropski parlament 2009, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Toš N. ed. (1999), Vrednote v prehodu II: Slovensko javno mnenje 1990-1999, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Toš N. ed. (2004), Vrednote v prehodu III: Slovensko javno mnenje 1999-2004, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Toš N. ed. (2009), Vrednote v prehodu IV: Slovensko javno mnenje 2004-2009, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Toš N. ed. (2012), Vrednote v prehodu V: Slovensko javno mnenje 2009-2012, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
• Van den Berge M. (2014), The 2014 EP Election Campaign in the Member States: National Debates, European Elections: TEPSA Report, Brussels, June 2014.
• Vehovar U. (2012), Slovenija, arhipelag obmodernosti, [in] J. Prunk, T. Deželan (eds.), Dvajset let slovenske države, Maribor: Aristej.

Identifiers

DOI

10.6084/m9.figshare.1282350