Formulaic Language: A Living Linguistic Fossil for a Holistic Protolanguage

• Authors: Nicchiarelli Serena
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Humans today have the ability to use language. The common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans probably did not. During recent decades evolutionary linguists have attempted to explain how the gap between a non-linguistic ancestor and our linguistic species was bridged. In this direction, it has become common to invoke the notion of a protolanguage as a stable intermediary stage in the evolution of language. A key dispute among the currently-available hypotheses of protolanguage is represented by the distinction between holistic and synthetic accounts: did human protolanguage consist of holistic utterances – later segmented into single words – or did it start with simple units that were added together into more complex structures? The synthetic account is generally recognized as “the standard model,” thus assuming that the earliest forms of a presumed protolanguage were compositional, that is built up from single words, where one word corresponds to one concept. However, recent years have seen the consolidation of the alternative idea: each element of a protolanguage would have been linguistically unanalyzable and referred to a whole situation. This paper presents the case of formulaic language as evidence – a living linguistic fossil – which corroborates arguments in support of a holistic protolanguage account.

Keywords

EN

language origins; holistic protolanguage; formulaicity

• Publisher: Komisja Nauk Filologicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział we Wrocławiu
• Journal: Academic Journal of Modern Philology
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 3
• Pages: 67-73

Dates

published

2014

Contributors

author

Nicchiarelli Serena

• Roma Tre University, Italy

References

• Arbib, Michael A. (2002) The Mirror System, Imitation and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Arbib, Michael A. (2003) The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Arbib, Michael A. (2005) “From Monkey-Like Action Recognition to Human Language: An Evolutionary Framework for Neurolinguistics.” [In:] Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2); 105–167.
• Arbib, Michael A., Katja Liebal, Simone Pika (2008) “Primate Vocalization, Gesture and the Evolution of Human Language.” [In:] Current Anthropology 49 (6); 1053–1076.
• Becker, Joseph (1975) The Phrasal Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: Beranek & Newman.
• Bickerton, Derek (1990) Language and Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Bickerton, Derek (1995) Language and Human Behavior. London: UCL Press.
• Bickerton, Derek (1996) Language and Human Behavior. London: UCL Press.
• Bickerton, Derek (1998) “Catastrophic Evolution: The Case for a Single Step from Protolanguage to Full Human Language.” [In:] James R. Hurford, Michael Studdert-Kennedy, Chris Knight (eds.) Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 341–358.
• Bickerton, Derek (2000) “How Protolanguage Became Language”. [In:] Chris Knight, Michael Studdert-Kennedy, James R. Hurford (eds.) The Evolutionary Emergence of Language. Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 264–284.
• Bickerton, Derek (2003) “Symbol and Structure: A Comprehensive Framework for Language Evolution.” [In:] Morten H. Christiansen, Simon Kirby (eds.) Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 77–93.
• Bickerton, Derek (2009) Adam’s Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans. Farrar: Straus and Giroux.
• Bickerton, Derek (2010) “Foraging versus Social Intelligence in the Evolution of Protolanguage.” [In:] Alison Wray (ed.) The Transition to Language. Studies in the Evolution of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 207–225.
• Calvin, William, Derek Bickerton (2000) Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky with the Human Brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Dessalles, Jean-Louis (2000) Aux origines du langage. Paris: Hermès Science Publications.
• Dessalles, Jean-Louis (2006) “Du protolangage au langage: modèle d’une transition.” [In:] Margeslinguistiques 11; 142–152.
• Fitch, William Tecumseh (2005) “The Evolution of Language: A Comparative Review.” [In:] Biology and Philosophy 20; 193–230.
• Fitch, William Tecumseh (2010) The Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Jackendoff, Ray (1999) “Possible Stages in the Evolution of the Language Capacity.” [In:] Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (7); 272–279.
• Jackendoff, Ray (2002) Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kirby, Simon (2009) “The Evolution of Language.” [In:] Robin Dunbar, Louise Barrett (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 669–681.
• Knight, Chris, Michael Studdert-Kennedy, James R. Hurford (eds.) (2000) The Evolutionary Emergence of Language. Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• McMahon, April, Robert McMahon (2013) Evolutionary Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Reiss, Nira (1989) “Speech Act Taxonomy, Chimpanzee Communication, and the Evolutionary Basis of Language.” [In:] Jan Wind, Edward G. Pulleyblank, Éric de Grolier, Bernard H. Bichakjian (eds.) Studies in Language Origins. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 283–304.
• Smith, Kenny (2006) “The Protolanguage Debate: Bridging the Gap?” [In:] Evolution of Language. Proceeding of the 6th International Conference (Evolang6). World Scientific Publishing; 315–322.
• Tallerman, Maggie (2005) Language Origins. Perspectives on Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Tallerman, Maggie (2006) “A Holistic Protolanguage Cannot Be Stored, Cannot Be Retrieved.” [In:] Evolution of Language. Proceeding of the 6th International Conference (Evolang6). World Scientific Publishing; 447–449.
• Tallerman, Maggie (2007) “Did Our Ancestors Speak a Holistic Protolanguage?” [In:] Lingua 117 (3); 579–604.
• Tallerman, Maggie, Kathleen Gibson (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Wray, Alison (1998) “Protolanguage as a Holistic System for Social Interactions.” [In:] Language & Communication 18; 47–67.
• Wray, Alison (1999) “Formulaic Language in Learners and Native Speakers.” [In:] Language Teaching 32 (4); 213–231.
• Wray, Alison (2000) “Holistic Utterances in Protolanguage: The Link from Primates to Humans.” [In:] Chris Knight, Michael Studdert-Kennedy, James R. Hurford (eds.) The Evolutionary Emergence of Language. Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 285–302.
• Wray, Alison (2010) “Dual Processing in Protolanguage: Performance without Competence.” [In:] Alison Wray (ed.) The Transition to Language. Studies in the Evolution of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 113–137.
• Wray, Alison (2008a) “Genes and the Conceptualization of Language Knowledge.” [In:] Genomics, Society and Policy 4 (1); 58–73.
• Wray, Alison (2008b) “The Puzzle of Language Learning: From Child’s Play to ‘Linguaphobia’.” [In:] Language Teach 41 (2); 253–271.
• Wray, Alison (2009) “Future Directions in Formulaic Language Research.” [In:] Journal of Foreign Languages 32 (6); 2–17.
• Wray, Alison (ed.) (2010) The Transition to Language. Studies in the Evolution of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Wray, Alison, Michael R. Perkins (2000) “The Functions of Formulaic Language: An Integrated Model.” [In:] Language & Communication 20 (1); 1–28.