PL EN


2015 | Vol. 4 | 95-108
Article title

A human being after Auschwitz and Gulag or How to Interrogate about a Human Being

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The paper focuses on possibility and problematicity of modern interrogation about a human being. Problematicity emerges as a man is put in a situation called “after Auschwitz”, which is described with the categories of irreducibility (irreducibility of experience, means of self-determination). It is shown that the cultural form of representing such ultimate experience is testimony, which itself problematizes after Auschwitz. Precedents of such testimonies are described with examples of the works by Primo Levi and Varlam Shalamov. The author reveals the principal difference in the answers given by witnesses and the answers offered by interpreters such as contemporary philosophers. An attempt is made to substantiate that the modern experience of philosophizing about a human being – the modern anthropology – has to reject traditional efforts to determine a human being as “thing existent” or find some determinant essence. It is due to the situation “after Auschwitz” that questions all previous methods of human thinking. Moreover, a modern person increasingly chooses the so-called withdrawal scenario for a human being, rejection of actual social life in favour of imitating life and generating simulacrums, withdrawal to the virtual reality. The author takes a provocative example of Jean Baudrillard, who showed that the entire contemporary creative work of human beings is reduced to generating simulacrums – empty, meaningless signs. The latter becomes a popular trend obtaining a mass character. In response to this withdrawal trend the author proposes a different scenario: an anthropological alternative in the form of anthropological practices of self-determination and testimonies about such anthropological practices.
Contributors
References
  • Agamben Giorgio (2012), Homo sacer. Chto ostaetsya posle Osventsima: arkhiv i svidetel’ [Homo Sacer. What remains after Auschwitz: archives and witnesses], Moscow: Europe [in Russian].
  • Agamben Giorgio (2011), Homo sacer. Suverennaya vlast’ i golaya zhizn’ [Sovereign power and bare life], Moscow: Europe [in Russian].
  • Bakhtin Mikhail (2003), K filosofii postupka [By the philosophy of the act]. In: Collected Works. V. 1. Moscow: Publisher Russian dictionaries [in Russian].
  • Bibikhin Vladimir (1991), Delo Khaideggera [Case of Heidegger]. // Filosofiya Martina Khaideggera i sovremennost’. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
  • Bodriyyar Zhan (2015), Simulyakry i simulyatsii [Simulacra et simulation]. Moscow: Postum [in Rusian].
  • Gabriel’ Markus (2015), Natsist iz zasady [Nazi ambush]. «Voprosy filosofii». № 4. S. 166-169 [in Russian].
  • Levi Primo (2010), Kanuvshie i spasennye [Sunk and rescued], Moscow: The New Publisher [in Russian].
  • Levi Primo (2011), Chelovek li eto? [Is this is a Man?], Moscow: Text [in Russian].
  • Motroshilova Nelli (2015), Chernye tetradi M. Khaydeggera: po sledam publikatsii [Black notebooks by M. Heidegger: on the trail of publication]. «Voprosy filosofii». № 4. S. 131-162 [in Russian].
  • Motroshilova Nelli (1991), Drama zhizni, idei i grekhopadeniya Martina Khaideggera [The drama of life, ideas, and the fall of Martin Heidegger. The philosophy of Martin Heidegger and Modernity]. // Filosofiya Martina Khaideggera i sovremennost’. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
  • Nansi Zh.-L. (2015), Khaydegger i my [Heidegger and we]. «Voprosy filosofii». № 4. S. 163-165 [in Russian].
  • Podoroga Valeriy (2010), Apologiya politicheskogo [Apology of Political], Moscow: Publishing House of National University “Higher School of Economics” [in Russian].
  • Smirnov Sergey (2010), Chertov most. Vvedenie v antropologiyu perekhoda [Devil’s Bridge. Introduction to Anthropology of transition], Novosibirsk: Ofset [in Russian].
  • Smirnov Sergey (2011), Avtopoezis cheloveka. Filosofskie ocherki po antropologii stikha [Autopoiesis of human being. Philosophical essays on poetry anthropology], Novosibirsk: Ofset [in Russian].
  • Smirnov Sergey (2015), Forsayt cheloveka. Opyty po neklassicheskoy filosofii cheloveka [Foresight of Human Being. Experiences on non-classical philosophy of Human Being], Novosibirsk: Ofset [in Russian].
  • Shalamov Varlam (1992), Kolymskie rasskazy [Kolyma Tales], books 1, 2. Moscow: Russian Book [in Russian].
  • Shalamov Varlam (2009), Neskol’ko moikh zhizney. Vospominaniya. Zapisnye knizhki. Perepiska. Sledstvennye dela [Several of my lives. Memories. Notebooks. Correspondence. The investigations of the case], Moscow: Exmo [in Russian].
  • Khaydegger Martin (2009), Vklady v filosofiyu. Ot Sobytiya [Contributions to philosophy. From the Event], “Ἑρµηνεία. Journal of philosophical translations”, 1 (1), p.p. ­56-94 [in Russian].
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-b23e9e0f-3cbe-4d29-bc89-3844a6274243
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.