Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2013 | 23 | 4 | 91-118

Article title

Udział adwokatów w procesie kanonizacyjnym. Studium historycznoprawne

Authors

Title variants

EN
Participation of Advocates in the Canonization Process a Legal and Historical Study

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
Since the 13th century, one of the participants of canonization processes has been advocatus fiscalis or, since the 15th century, promotor fiscalis, commonly referred to as a promoter of the faith. Beginning with the pontificate of Urban VIII (1623-1644), this function has been partaking in every case. On 11 January 1631, in the brief Nomina del Promoteore della Fede, the pope appointed the consistorial advocate to the office of Promoter of the Faith; he, at the same time, serves as fiscal advocate and the advocate of the Apostolic Chamber. One of the roles of the Promoter of the Faith was to report any problematic issues in the case; hence, in the 1917 Code of Canon Law of 1917 he was unjustly called advocatus diaboli; nevertheless, he always strived for the truth. The Promoter of the Faith was appointed from among the consistorial advocates, auditors of the Roman Rota or the Apostolic Chamber. The responsibility of consistorial advocates was to submit requests for beatification or canonization. The evolution of their roles and the establishment of a new institution, the College of Twelve Advocates for the Causes of Saints, are addressed in the second part of the article. The third part focuses on the participation of the advocate in canonization cases under the 1917 Code of Canon Law; the fourth part outlines the current legal status: advocate’s responsibility (to discover the truth) as shared with a number of entities engaged in the process of beatification.

Year

Volume

23

Issue

4

Pages

91-118

Physical description

Contributors

  • Katedra Prawa Kanonizacyjnego, Wydział Prawa, Prawa Kanonicznego i Administracji KUL

References

  • Advocati consistoriales, [w:] F.L. Ferraris, Bibliotheca Canonica Iuridica Moralis Theologica nec non Ascetica Polemica Rubricista historica, t. I, Romae 1885.
  • Bar J.R., Polskie procesy kanonizacyjne i beatyfikacyjne, RBL 11(1958).
  • Bar W., Advocatus Dei, mps.
  • Bar W., Advocatus diaboli. Promotor fidei, [w:] Leksykon prawa kanonicznego, red. M. Sitarz [w druku].
  • Bar W., Promotor wiary, EK, t. XVI, Lublin 2012, kol. 482-484.
  • Chiappetta L., Avvocato Consistoriale, [w:] Prontuario di diritto canonico e concordatario, Roma 1994.
  • Chiappetta L., Avvocato del Diavolo, [w:] Prontuario di diritto canonico e concordatario, Roma 1994.
  • Chiappetta L., Avvocato per le Cause dei Santi, [w:] Prontuario di diritto canonico e concordatario, Roma 1994.
  • Chiappetta L., Avvocato presso la Curia Romana e la Santa Sede, [w:] Prontuario di diritto canonico e concordatario, Roma 1994.
  • Enrico da Scusa (Card. Ostiense), Appendice, Commento dell’Ostiense alla decretale «Audivimus» (X, III, 45, 1). In Tertium Decretalium librum commentaria, Venezia 1581, fol. 172r-173r, [w:] J.L. Gutiérez, Studi sulle cause di canonizzazione, Milano 2005.
  • Gullo C., Gli Avvocati (artt. 183-185 Cost. Ap. «Pastor Bonus»), [w:] La Curia Romana nella Cost. Ap. „Pastor Bonus”, a cura di P.A. Bonnet, C. Gullo, Citta del Vaticano 1990.
  • Kuttner S.,La réserve papale du droit de canonisation, „Revue historique de droit français et étranger” 17(1938).
  • Machejek M., Padacz W., Sprawy beatyfikacyjne na terenie diecezji, Poznań 1957.
  • Misztal H., Ad rei futuram memoriam w sprawach kanonizacyjnych, [w:] Przygotowanie sprawy beatyfikacyjnej. Aktualny stan prawny, red. W. Bar, L. Fiejdasz, Lublin 2010, s. 33-56.
  • Misztal H., Komentarz do konstytucji apostolskiej „Divinus perfectionis Magister”, Lublin 1987.
  • Misztal H., Prawo kanonizacyjne. Instytucje prawa materialnego, zarys historii, procedura, wyd. II, Lublin 2003.
  • Misztal H., Sanctorum Mater. Instrukcja Kongregacji Spraw Kanonizacyjnych o prowadzeniu dochodzenia diecezjalnego lub eparchialnego w sprawach kanonizacyjnych. Komentarz, wyd. II, Lublin 2011.
  • Misztal H., Stosowanie procedury ne pereant probationes w sprawach kanonizacyjnych, [w:] Przygotowanie sprawy beatyfikacyjnej. Aktualny stan prawny, red. W. Bar, L. Fiejdasz, Lublin 2010, s. 129-151.
  • Misztal H., Świeccy świeci i błogosławieni, wyd. II, Lublin-Sandomierz 2002.
  • Miziński A.G., Status prawny adwokata w Kościele łacińskim, Lublin 2011.
  • Noval I., Commentarium Codicis Iuris Canonici, Liber IV, De processibus, Roma 1920.
  • Palazzini P.,Le congregazione romane, [w:] La Curia Romana nella Cost. Ap. «Pastor Bonus», a cura di P.A. Bonnet, C. Gullo, Citta del Vaticano 1990.
  • Petrani A., W sprawie dekretu papieża Aleksandra III „Audivimus”, RTK 16(1969), s. 5-10.
  • Płodzień S., Advocatus Dei, EK, t. I, Lublin 1973, kol. 112.
  • Płodzień S., Adwokaci Kurii Rzymskiej, EK, t. I, Lublin 1973, kol. 117.
  • Płodzień S., Adwokat, EK, t. I, Lublin 1973, kol. 118.
  • Wycisk F., Advocatus diaboli, EK, t. I, Lublin 1973, kol. 112.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-b3fb0abc-c765-46e5-8955-e9d1dafea6d4
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.