PL EN


2017 | 31 | 51–70
Article title

Lancashire and RP: A comparison of processes of connected speech

Authors
Content
Title variants
PL
Porównanie zjawisk językowych w dialekcie Lancashire do Received Pronunciation
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
PL
Celem badania jest opis procesów mowy potocznej występujących w dialekcie Lancashire, niestandardowej odmianie języka angielskiego. Badanie to uzupełnia istniejącą lukę w literaturze przedmiotu: prace Wells(1982) lub Kortmann i Upton (2008) nie zawierają systematycznego opisu cech Lancashire. Badanie zostało przeprowadzone za pomocą analizy akustycznej na korpusie mowy Phonologie de l’Anglais Contemporain, zawierającym 4,5 godziny nagrań mowy potocznej dziewięciu rodzimych użytkowników Lancashire. Porównanie listy procesów występujących w Lancashire w stosunku do Received Pronunciation pozytywnie zweryfikowało hipotezę Kortmanna i Wagnera (2005). Według niej w odmianach niestandardowych języka występują zjawiska językowe nieobecne w standardzie. Trzy cechy typowe dla Lancashire, usuwanie /j/, /g/oraz lenicja spółgłosek, zostały skorelowane z wiekiem, wykształceniem i długością pobytu w Lancashire, a wyniki okazały się niejednoznaczne.
EN
The paper reports the results of a study on connected speech processes in the Lancashire dialect. Auditoryand acoustic analysis was performed on 4.5 hs of speech of 9 speakers of Lancashire from the Phonologiede l’Anglais Contemporain corpus. Filling a gap in the literature (Lancashire is neither discussed by Wells1982 nor by Kortmann, Upton 2008), a list of connected speech processes is provided. Comparison of processesfound in Lancashire to RP and other dialects of English (Lodge 1984) reveals that Lancashire hasa number of processes, absent from the highly codified variety but found in other dialects of English. In fact,Lancashire exhibits the processes of Yod dropping, fricativization and g-dropping which are unattested inRP. Age, education and duration of residence, factored in for explaining the use of dialect-specific processes,produced mixed results.
Year
Issue
31
Pages
51–70
Physical description
Dates
published
2017
Contributors
  • Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań
References
  • Altendorf U., Watt D. 2008: The dialects in the South of England: Phonology, [in:] Kortmann B., Upton C. (eds.), Varieties of English, Vol. 1: The British Isles, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 194–222.
  • Beaken M.A. 1971: A study of phonological development in a primary school population of East London, PhD thesis: University of London, [in:] Wells J. (1982), ‘Accents of English’, Volume I: ‘An Introduction’, CUP: Cambridge.
  • Beal J. 2008: English dialects in the North of England: Phonology, [in:] Kortman B., Upton C. (eds.), Varieties of English, Vol. 1: The British Isles, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 122–144.
  • Beal J.C. 2010: An Introduction to Regional Englishes. Dialect Variation in England, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Boersma P., Weenink D. 2016: Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program], version 6.0.19, <http://www.praat.org/> [13.06.2016].
  • Bussmann H. 1996: Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics, London–New York: Routledge.
  • Carr P. 2008: A Glossary of Phonology, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Durand J., Gut U., Kristoffersen G. (eds.) 2014: The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology, Oxford: OUP.
  • Durand J., Pukli M. 2004: How to construct a phonological corpus: PRAAT and the PAC project, Tribune Internationale des Langues Vivantes (TILV), Vol. 36, 36–46.
  • French P., Miller S., Cade V., Hunt C. 1986: Documenting Language Change in East Yorkshire, Transactions of the Yorkshire Dialect Society, Vol. 16, Part LXXXVI.
  • García-Bermejo Giner M.F., Montgomery M. 2001: Yorkshire English Two Centuries Ago, Journal of English Linguistics 29(4), 346–362.
  • Hannisdal B. 2006: Variability and change in Received Pronunciation [unpublished PhD thesis], Bergen: University of Bergen.
  • Hollmann W.B., Siewierska A. 2006: Corpora and (the need for) other methods in a study of Lancashire dialect, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2), 203–216.
  • Honeybone P. 2001: Lenition inhibition in Liverpool English, English Language and Linguistics 5(2), 213–249.
  • Honeybone P. 2005: Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: The case of obstruent laryngeal specifications, [in:] van Oostendorp M., van de Weijer J. (eds.), The Internal Organization of Phonological Segments, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 319–354.
  • Honeybone P. 2007: New-dialect formation in nineteenth century Liverpool: A brief history of Scouse, [in:] Grant A., Grey C. (eds.), The Mersey Sound: Liverpool’s Language, People and Places, Liverpool: Open House Press, 106–140.
  • Jones M. 2002: The origin of Definite Article Reduction in northern English dialects: Evidence from dialect allomorphy, English Language and Linguistics 6(2), 325–345.
  • Knowles G. 1975: Scouse: The urban dialect of Liverpool, [unpublished PhD thesis], Leeds: University of Leeds.
  • Kortmann B., Upton C. (eds.) 2008: Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Kortmann B., Wagner S. 2005: The Freiburg English Dialect Project and Corpus FRED), [in:] Kortmann B., Hermann T., Pietsch L., Wagner S. (eds.), A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects: Agreement, Gender, Relative Clauses, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–20.
  • Lodge K. 1984: Studies in the Phonology of Colloquial English, Kent: Croon Helm.
  • Milroy L. 1980: Language and Social Networks, London–Baltimore: Basil Blackwell, University Park Press.
  • Orton H., Halliday W.J. (eds.) 1962: Survey of English Dialects, Vol. 1: The six Northern countries and the Isle of Man, Leeds: E.J. Arnold & Son Ltd.
  • Piroth H.G., Janker P.M. 2004: Speaker-dependent differences in voicing and devoicing of German obstruents, Journal of Phonetics 32(1), 81–109.
  • Schneider E.W., Burridge K., Kortmann B., Mesthrie R., Upton C. (eds.) 2004: A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool, 2 vols, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Tagliamonte S. 1998: Was / were variation across the generations: View from the city of York, Language Variation and Change 10(2), 153–191.
  • Tagliamonte S. 2001: Come / came variation in English dialects, American Speech 76(4), 42–61.
  • Trask R.L. 1996: A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology, London–New York: Routledge.
  • Watson K. 2006a: Phonological resistance and innovation in the North-West of England, English Today 22(2), 55–61.
  • Watson K. 2006b: The phonetics and phonology of plosive lenition in Liverpool English [unpublished PhD thesis], Lancaster University.
  • Watson K. 2007: Liverpool English, Journal of the International Phonetics Association 37(3), 351–360.
  • Wells J. 1982: Accents of English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-b4b8ce98-da78-423c-9823-4f23ad1da8ab
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.