Tax System in Poland – Progressive or Regressive?

• Authors: Tomkiewicz Jacek
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Purpose: To analyse the impact of the Polish fiscal regime on the general revenue of the country, and specifically to establish whether the cumulative tax burden borne by Polish households is progressive or regressive.Methodology: On the basis of Eurostat and OECD data, the author has analysed fiscal regimes in EU Member States and in OECD countries. The tax burden of households within different income groups has also been examined pursuant to applicable fiscal laws and data pertaining to the revenue and expenditure of households published by the Central Statistical Office (CSO).Conclusions: The fiscal regime in Poland is regressive; that is, the relative fiscal burden decreases as the taxpayer’s income increases.Research Implications: The article contributes to the on-going discussion on social cohesion, in particular with respect to economic policy instruments aimed at the redistribution of income within the economy.Originality: The author presents an analysis of data pertaining to fiscal policies in EU Member States and OECD countries and assesses the impact of the legal environment (fiscal regime and social security system) in Poland on income distribution within the economy. The impact of the total tax burden (direct and indirect taxes, social security contributions) on the economic situation of households from different income groups has been calculated using an original formula.

Keywords

EN

social cohesion; primary and secondary distribution; social insurance system; fiscal regime

• Publisher: Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
• Journal: Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe
• Year: 2016
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 107-122

Dates

published

2016-06-15

Contributors

author

Tomkiewicz Jacek

• Kozminski University

References

• Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A., Piketty, T. and Saez, E. (2013). The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective. NBER Working Paper 19075.
• Atkinson, A. (2015). Inequalities: What Can Be Done? Harvard University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/9780674287013
• GUS (2015). Sytuacja gospodarstw domowych w 2014 r. w świetle wyników badania budżetów gospodarstw domowych. Warszawa: GUS.
• IMF (2007). World Economic Outlook. International Monetary Fund, October.
• Jacobsen, K.H. (2014). How Can Scandinavians Tax So Much? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4).
• Mankiw, G. (2013). Defending the One Percent. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3).
• Muszyński, K. and Janyst, T. (2015). Kapitał w Polsce w XXI wieku. Regulacje w służbie najsilniejszych: Praca i Kapitał. Warszawa: Fundacja Kaleckie.
• Myck, M., Kundera, M., Najsztub, M. and Oczkowska, M. (2015). Dwie kadencje w polityce podatkowo świadczeniowej: programy wyborcze i ich realizacja w latach 2007–2015, IV Raport Przedwyborczy CenEA 03/09/2015.
• NBP (2015). Zasobność gospodarstw domowych w Polsce Raport z badania pilotażowego 2014 r.. Warszawa: Narodowy Bank Polski.
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in The Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542
• Tanzi, V. (2014). The Challenges of Taxing the Big, Revista de Economia Mundial 37.