Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 1 | 1 | 18–28

Article title

The Human Difference: Beyond Nomotropism

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The main theme of this essay is f i n i t e l i f e, which is the bedrock of modern biopolitics. In the series of lectures devoted to the ‘birth of biopolitics,’ Michel Foucault defines it as a new system of ‘governing the living’ based on the natural cycle of birth and death, and the law of genesis kai phtora, ‘becoming and perishing.’ Foucault’s answer to modern biopolitics is to accept its basic premise – that life is finite, and, consequently, reduced to the natural law of birth and death – and then slightly correct the naive liberal trust in the ‘naturalness’ of human existence by appropriating and internalizing the true essence of the biopolitical paradigm: the disciplining practices. This essay contests Foucault’s minimalist Neostoic program of the ‘care of the self’ by demonstrating that we can still hope for a n o t h e r f i n i t u d e that refrains from any renaturalization of human existence.

Year

Volume

1

Issue

1

Pages

18–28

Physical description

Dates

published
2017-09-02

Contributors

  • Theology & Religious Studies, University of Nottingham
  • Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Science

References

  • Aurelius, Marcus. Meditations. Translated by G. M. A Grube. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merill, 1963.
  • Foucault, Michel. “La vie: l’expérience et le science.” In Dits et écrits II, 1976–1988. Paris: Gallimard, 2001.
  • Foucault, Michel. “Le souci de la verité. Entretien avec F. Ewald.” In Dits et écrits II, 1976–1988. Paris: Gallimard, 2001.
  • Foucault, Michel. Care of the Self. The History of Sexuality III. Translated by Robert Hurley. London: Penguin, 1986..
  • Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the College de France 1978–79. ed. Michel; Senellart, trans. Graham Burchell, (Houndmills and New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2008),
  • Hadot, Pierre. The Veil of Isis. An Essay on the History of the Idea of Nature. Translated by Michael Chase. The Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass, 2006.
  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Science of Logic, Translated by A. V. Miller. London: Allen and Unwin, 1969.
  • Heidegger, Martin. Introduction to Metaphysics. Translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt. Yale University Press: New Haven, 2000.
  • Lacan, Jacques. “Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectics of Desire.” In Écrits. A Selection, Translated by Alan Sheridan, London: Routledge, 1989..
  • Laplanche, Jean. Entre séduction et inspiration: l’homme. Paris: Quadrige / Presses Universitaires de France, 1999.
  • Santner, Eric L. “Freud’s “Moses” and the Ethics of Nomotropic Desire.” October 88 (1999): 3-41.
  • Sloterdijk, Peter. Regeln für den Menschenpark. Ein Antwortschreiben zu Heideggers Brief über Humanismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999.
  • Žižek, Slavoj. The Fragile Absolute Or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For?. London: Verso, 2000.
  • Žižek, Slavoj. The Puppet and the Dwarf. The Perverse Core of Christianity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003.

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-b58faa18-dda9-43b3-bd05-c8ba6c301b42
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.