PL EN


2013 | 4 | 133-151
Article title

Techniques of social influence with reference to political life

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The present paper presents various social influence techniques – practices aimed at increasing the likelihood that people will comply with requests, persuasion and suggestion they are addressed with. It describes sequential techniques (‘foot-in-the-door’, ‘door-in-the-face’, ‘foot-in-the-face’,’ low ball’) as well as techniques based on cognitive mechanisms (‘that’s not all’, ‘even a penny helps’, ‘dialogue involvement’) or on emotional mechanisms (‘induction of guilt’, 'embarrassment’, ‘fear-then-relief’). The paper also presents examples of using the above mentioned techniques with special focus on some which were taken from political life.
Contributors
  • Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poland
  • University of Wroclaw, Poland
References
  • Apsler R. (1975), Effects of embarrassment on behaviour toward others, “Journal of
  • Argyle M., Henderson, M. (1984), The rules of friendship, “Journal of Social and Personal Relationships”, 1, pp. 211-237.
  • Bargh J.A. (1994), The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition, [in:] R.S. Wyer, T.K. Srull (eds.), Handbook of social cognition, 2nd ed.,1, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1-40.
  • Baumeister R.F., Reis, H.T., Delespaul, P.A.E.G. (1995), Subjective and experiential correlates of guilt in daily life, “Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, 21, pp. 1256-1268.
  • Bem D.J. (1967), Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena, “Psychological Review”, 74, pp. 183-200.
  • Bem D.J. (1972), Self-perception theory, [in:] L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (vol. 6), New York: Academic Press, pp. 1-62.
  • Boster F.J., Mongeau, P. (1984), Fear-arousing persuasive messages, “Communication Yearbook”, 8, pp. 330-375.
  • Burger J.M. (1986), Increasing compliance by improving the deal: The that’s-not-all technique, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 51, pp. 277-283.
  • Burger J.M. (1999), The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review, “Personality and Social Psychology Review”, 3, pp. 303-325.
  • Burger J.M., Messian, N., Patel, S., del Prado, A., Anderson, C. (2004), What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance, “Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, 30, pp. 35-43.
  • Burger J.M., Soroka, S., Gonzago, K., Murphy, E., Somervell, E. (2001), The effect of fleeting attraction on compliance to requests, “Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, 27, pp. 1578-1586.
  • Carlsmith J.M., Gross A.E. (1969), Some effects of guilt on compliance, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 11, pp. 232-239.
  • Cialdini R.B. (2001), Influence: Science and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Cialdini R.B., Cacioppo, Basset, R., J.T., Miller, J.A. (1977), Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: Commitment then cost, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 36, pp. 463-476.
  • Cialdini R.B., Schroeder, D. (1976), Increasing compliance by legitimizing paltry contributions: When even a penny helps, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 34, pp. 599-604.
  • Cialdini R.B., Vincent J.E., Lewis S.K., Catalan J., Wheeler D., Darby B.L. (1975), Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 31, pp. 206-215.
  • Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J. (2004), Social influence: Compliance and conformity, “Annual
  • Cwalina W, Falkowski A., Newman, B.I. (2011), Political marketing: Theoretical and strategic foundations, New York: Sharpe.
  • Darlington R.B., Macker C.E. (1966), Displacement of guilt-produced altruistic behaviour, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 4, pp. 442-443.
  • Dillard J.P., Pfau M. (2002), The persuasion handbook: developments in theory and
  • Dolinski (2001) Emotional seesaw, compliance, and mindlessness, “European Psychologist”, 6, pp. 194-203.
  • Dolinski D. (1996), The mystery of the Polish soul. B.W. Johnson’s effect a rebours, “European Journal of Social Psychology”, 26, pp. 1001-1005.
  • Dolinski D. (2011), A rock or a hard place: The foot-in-the-face technique for inducing compliance without pressure, “Journal of Applied Social Psychology”, 41, pp. 1514-1537.
  • Dolinski D., Nawrat M., Rudak I. (2001), Dialogue involvement as a social influence technique, “Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, 27, pp. 1395-1406.
  • Dolinski D., Nawrat R. (1998), Fear-then-relief procedure for producing compliance. Beware when the danger is over, “Journal of Experimental Social Psychology”, 34, pp. 27-50.
  • door-in-the-face influence strategy, “Communication Reports”, 14, pp. 31-38.
  • Downs A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Political action in a Democracy, [in:] A. Downs (1998), Political Theory and Public Choice. The Selected Essays of Anthony Downs Vol. 1, Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp.135-150.
  • Fiorina M.P. (1981), Retrospective Voting in American National Elections, New Have and London: Yale University Press.
  • Fointiat V. (2000), ‘Foot-in-the-mouth’ versus ‘door-in-the-face’ requests, “Journal of Social
  • Freedman J.L., Fraser, S. (1966), Compliance without pressure: The foot in the door technique, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 4, pp. 195-202.
  • Freedman J.L., Wallington S.A., Bless E. (1967) Compliance without pressure: The effects of guilt, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 7, pp. 117-124.
  • Frijda N.H. (1986), The emotions. Studies in emotion and social interaction, Paris: Maison de Sciences de l’Homme and Cambridge University Press.
  • Gerber A., Green, D., Shachar, R. (2003), Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment, “American Journal of Political Science”, 47, pp. 540-550.
  • Gouldner A.W. (1960), The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement, “American Sociological Review”, 25, pp. 161-178.
  • Han H.C. (2009), Does the content of political appeals matter in motivating participation? A field experiment on self-disclosure in political appeals, “Political Behavior”, 31, pp. 103-116.
  • Howard D.J. (1990), The influence of verbal responses to common greetings on compliance behavior: The foot-in-the-mouth effect, “Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, pp. 1185-1196.
  • http://www. store.mitttomney.com: M. Romney, 2012 0fficial Store, Homepage.
  • http://www.facebook.com/beyonce: Beyoncé Knowles.
  • http://www.store.barackobama.com: B. Obama for America, 2012, Store, Homepage.
  • Izard C.E. (1977), Human emotions, Plenum Press: New York and London.
  • Joule R.V., Gouilloux F., Weber, F. (1989), The lure: A new compliance procedure, “Journal of Social Psychology”,129, pp. 741-749.
  • Kiesler C.A. (1971), The psychology of commitment, Academic Press: New York.
  • Konoske P., Staple S., Graf R.G. (1979), Compliant reactions to guilt: Self-esteem or selfpunishment, “Journal of Social Psychology”, 108, pp. 207-211.
  • Kraut R.E., McConohay J.B. (1973), How being interviewed affects voting: An experiment, “Public Opinion Quarterly”, 37, pp. 398-406.
  • Langer E.J., Blank A., Chanowitz B. (1978), The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of ‘placebic’ information in interpersonal interaction, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 36, pp. 635-642.
  • Larson D. W. (1988), The psychology of reciprocity in international relations, “Negotiation Journal”, 4, pp. 281-301.
  • Larson D. W. (1998), Exchange and reciprocity in international negotiations, “International Negotiation”, 3, pp. 121-138.
  • Lazarus R.S., (1991), Emotion and adaptation, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lewis-Beck M.S. (1990), Economics And Elections. The Major Western Democracies, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Niedenthal P.M., Krauth-Gruber S., Ric F. (2006), Psychology of emotion. Interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches, New York & Hove: Psychology Press.
  • Niemi R.G., Weisberg H.F. (1993), Classics in Voting Behavior, Washigton D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, Introduction.
  • O’Keefe D.J., Hale S.L. (2001), An odds-ratio-based meta-analysis of research on the Personality and Social Psychology”, 32, pp. 145-153.
  • Pollock, C.L., Smith, S.D., Knowles, E.S., Bruce, H.J. (1998), Mindfulness limits compliance with the that’s-not-all technique, “Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, 24, pp. 1153-1157.
  • practice, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Pratkanis, A., Aronson, E. (2001), Age of propaganda. The everyday use and abuse of persuasion, New York: Freeman.
  • Psychology”, 140, pp. 264-266.
  • Review of Psychology”, 55, pp. 591-621.
  • Roloff, M.E. (1987), Communication and reciprocity within intimate relationships, [in:] M.E.
  • Roloff, G.R. Miller (eds.) Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 11-38.
  • Slugoski, B.R. (1995), Mindless processing of requests? Don’t ask twice, “British Journal of Social Psychology”, 34, pp. 335-350.
  • Suhay, E. (2006) Emotions and Americans’ political values: How pride and shame motivate the adoption of group ideals, Conference Papers-American Political Science Association
  • Tangney, J.P. (1995), Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships, [in:] J.P. Tangney, K.W. Fisher (eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarassement, and pride, New York: Guilford, pp. 114-142.
  • Tomkins, S.S. (1991), Affect, imagery, consciousness. Vol. III. The negative affects: Anger and fear, Springer: New York.
  • Uehara, E.S. (1995), Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner’s ‘moral norm of reciprocity’ and social support, “Journal of Social and Personal Relationship”, 12, pp. 483-502.
  • Vierasu, T., Hertanu, A., Talpau, A., Balasescu, M. (2011), How to manipulate polls, “Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov”, 4, pp. 79-84.
  • Wallace J., Sadalla E. (1966), Behavioral consequences of transgression: I. The effects of social recognitionm, “Journal of Experimental Research in Personality”, 1, pp. 187-194.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-b59ace4d-87cc-4816-a559-740c20a7cafa
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.