2017 | 19 | 1 | 59-81
Article title

Dancing the Ritual on the Kūṭiyāṭṭam Theatre Stage

Title variants
Languages of publication
Until the 1960s, Kūṭiyāṭṭam**—India’s Sanskrit theatre—was exclusively performed in Hindu temples of Kerala by an ensemble of three ritual performers of high status: the Cākyār actor-master, the Nampyār percussionist, and the Naṅṅyār reciter, cymbalist and actress. Within this devotional context, Kūṭiyāṭṭam, whose essence is theatre (nāṭya), is considered an offering of ‘dance’ (nṛtta) to the main divinity. Furthermore, the performative cycles, lasting from three to forty-one days, incorporate dances known as ‘kriya’, literally ‘what has to be done’ or ‘action’, designating the ritual action here. This paper attempts to complement previous studies based on the Indian theory of theatre, by questioning the uses and roles of dance in the Kūṭiyāṭṭam theatrical sphere and tackling the issue of boundaries between dance and dramatic action. The study draws on long-range anthropological research as well as on the Kūṭiyāṭṭam literature, especially the Cākyar’s acting and production manuals (āṭṭaprakāram and kramadīpikā) written in Malayalam, three of which are composed for the performance of the following Sanskrit plays: Bālacaritam and Abhiṣekanāṭakam of Bhāsa, and Āścaryacūḍāmaṇi of Śaktibhadra.
Physical description
  • Primary sources, manuscript: [Ms. Araṅṅēṯṯam Āṭṭaprakāram]. Rāma Cākyār. 1973. Bālacaritaṃ Sūtradhāran Puṟappāṭu˘. Acting manual for the Entry of the Director in the Bālacaritam. Kalāmaṇḍalam: 5 p. [Mal.].
  • Primary sources, dditions: [Aṅgulīyāṅkam Āṭṭaprakāram]. In: K. P. Narayana Pisharoti (ed.). 1988 [1967]. Āścaryacūḍāmaṇi. Trichur: Sangeet Natak Akademi: 184–407 [Mal.].
  • [Bālivadham Krāmadipika]. K. P. Narayana Pisharoti (ed.). 1993. Abhiṣekanāṭakattinṯe Krāmadipika 1. Bālivadhāṅkam. In: Kēḷi, Feb-March: 13–16 [Mal.].
  • Nagar, S. L. (ed.). 2008. Kamba Ramayana. 2 vol. [Eng. Transl.]. Delhi: Parimal.
  • [Naṭāṅkuśa]. K. G. Paulose (ed.). 1993. Naṭāṅkuśa. A Critique on Dramaturgy. Ravivarma Samskṛta Granthāvali 26 . Tripunithura: Government Sanskrit College Commite [Sk.].
  • Secondary sources: Bansat-Boudon, L. 1992. Poétique du théâtre indien. Lectures du Nāṭyaśāstra. Paris: EFEO.
  • —. 2001. “Nāndyante Sūtradhāraḥ”. Contribution d’Abhinavagupta à la question de la bénédiction liminaire dans le théâtre. In: R. Torella (ed.). Le parole e i marmi. Serie Orientale Roma 92.1. Roma: Istituto italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente: 37–85.
  • —. 2004. Danse/Théâtre ou le partage du sensible. In: Pourquoi le théâtre? La réponse indienne. Paris: Mille et une nuits: 177–218.
  • —. 2012. Aesthetica in nuce dans le mythe d’origine du théâtre indien. In: S. D’Intino and C. Guenzi (eds.). Aux Abords de la clairière. Turnhout: Brepols: 213–238.
  • Bargavinilayam, D. 1999. Māṇimādhavīyaṃ. Thiruvananthapuram: Government of Kerala, Department of Cultural Publications [Mal.].
  • Chakyar, M. M. 2015. Kutiyattam and Kerala Temples. Georgia: Athens.
  • Ganser, E. 2013. Trajectories of Dance on the Surface of Theatrical Meanings: Contribution to the Theory of Rasa from the Fourth Chapter of the Abhinavabhāratī. In: N. Mirnig, P.-D. Szántó and M. Williams (eds.). Puṣpikā: Tracing Ancient India through Texts and Traditions. Oxford: Oxbow Books: 173–202.
  • Guillebaud, Ch. 2008. Le chant des serpents. Musiciens itinérants du Kérala. Paris: CNRS.
  • Handelman, D. 2004. Why Ritual in Its Own Right? How so? In: Social Analysis, 48(2) (summer): 1–32.
  • Houseman, M. 2006. Relationality. In: J. Kreinath, J. Snoek and M. Stausberg. Theorizing Rituals. Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts. Numen Book Series: Studies on the History of Religions 114–1. Leiden: Brill: 413–428.
  • Johan, V. 2011a. Actresses on the Temple Stages? The Epic Conception and Performance of Women’s Roles in Kūṭiyāṭṭam Rāmāyaṇa Plays. In: H. Brückner, H. de Bruin and H. Moser (eds.). Between Fame and Shame: Performing Women—Women Performers in India. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz: 245–274.
  • —. 2011b. The Flower Needs Its Roots to Continue to Grow. In: Indian Folklife, 38 (Kūṭiyāṭṭam, Ten Years After The UNESCO Declaration, H. Moser ed.): 20–26.
  • —. 2014. Du je au jeu de l’acteur: ethnoscénologie du Kūṭiyāṭṭam, théâtre épique indien. Ph.D Thesis. Paris: Sorbonne-Nouvelle, 3 vol.: 1644 pp., 3 DVD-DL.
  • —. 2017. L’Entrée en scène d’un premier rôle d’acteur indien: ses apports pour l’analyse anthropologique et esthétique du jeu. In: Horizon-Théâtre, 8–9 (Les Théâtres du geste, du jeu et de la voix, P. Katuszewski, M. Manca eds.): 128–145.
  • —. forthcoming. Aṅgulīyāṅkam, Rāmāyaṇa-Veda of the Cākyārs. In: H. Oberlin and D. Shulman (eds.). Two Masterpieces of Kūṭiyāṭṭam: Aṅgulīyāṅkam and Mantrāṅkam. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Moser, H. 2000. Mantrāṅkam: The Third Act of Pratijñāyaugandharāyaṇam in Kūṭiyāṭṭam. In: Bulletin d’Études Indiennes, 17–18: 563–584.
  • —. 2011. Bibliography of Kūṭiyāṭṭam. Tübingen Universität, 2011. accessed: 8 October 2017).
  • —. 2012. Many “Kūṭiyāṭṭams”: Emotions and Rituals in Kerala’s Sanskrit Theatre between Tradition and Modernity. In: A. Michaels and C. Wulf (eds.). Emotions in Rituals and Performances: South Asian and European Perspectives on Rituals and Performativity. New Delhi: Routledge: 378–396.
  • Narayanan, M. 2006. Over-ritualization of Performance. Western Discourses on Kutiyattam. In: The Drama Review, 50(2): 136–153.
  • Rajagopalan, L. S. 2000. Kūṭiyāṭṭam. Preliminaries and Performance. Chennai: The Kuppuswami Sastri Research Institute.
  • Shulman, D. 2016. Deep Seeing: On the Poetics of Kūṭiyāṭṭam. In: A. Chakrabarti (ed.). The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Indian Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. New York: Bloomsbury: 221–249.
  • Veluthat, K. 2009. The Early Medieval in South India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.