EWOLUCJA NURTU NEOKONSERWATYWNEGO W POLITYCE USA W WYNIKU ZAMACHÓW Z 11 WRZEŚNIA 2001 ROKU I JEJ KONSEKWENCJE

• Authors: Milczanowski Maciej

Title variants

EN

EVOLUTION OF NEOCONS IN US POLICY AS A RESULT OF THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 ATTACKS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The article showcases and examines the evolution of the neoconservative strand of US politics and its influence on the country’s international politics, with a particular analytical emphasis on the effects of the September 11, 2001 attacks and the ensuing counter-terrorism measures on the part of the USA. The importance of the neocon agenda has grown considerably in the wake of the WTC and Pentagon attacks and, as a result, has shaped the core of US Middle Eastern politics. Simultaneously, the neocon takeover of US politics marginalized the impact of both the conservative and the liberal circles. As a consequence, the US national security evolved into a hard power model based on military authority. Such a political practice yielded short-term profits (and – at best – media benefits and image gains) for the USA, but in the long run it also posed a threat to the West.

Keywords

EN

neoconservatism; foreign policy; hard power; doctrine

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
• Journal: Polityka i Społeczeństwo
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 3(17)
• Pages: 103-117 (15)

Contributors

author

Milczanowski Maciej

• Instytut Nauk o Polityce, Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, al. mjr. W. Kopisto 2a, 35-959 Rzeszów, e-mail: [e-mail], ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2322-2074

References

• Baram A. 1983, Qawmiyya and Wataniyya in Ba'thi Iraq: The Search for a New Balance, “Middle Eastern Studies”, vol. 19, no. 2.
• Bell D. 2000, The End of Ideology. On the Exhaustion of Political Ideals in the Fifties, Cambridge.
• Bennett W.J. 2002, Why we fight. Moral clarity and the war on terrorism, New York.
• Borum R. 2004, Psychology of terrorism, Tampa.
• Brzezinski Z. 2008, Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower, New York.
• Bush G.W. 2010, Decision Points, New York.
• Caprioli M., Trumbore P.F. 2005, Rhetoric versus Reality: Rogue States in Interstate Conflict, “The Journal of Conflict Resolution”, vol. 49, no. 5.
• Cherrad-Benchefra Y., Debov V., Derradji Y., Smaali-Dekdouk D., Queffélec A. 2002, Le français en Algérie: Lexique et dynamique des langues V, Brouxeles.
• Chorośnicki M. 2011, TEA party jako odłam prawicowy republikanów, „Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe”, vol. VIII, no. 4.
• Crenshaw M. 1981, The Causes of Terrorism, “Comparative Politics”, no. 4.
• Damon A. 2009, CNN, Iraq: Abu Ghraib Legacy [online] http://edition.cnn.com/ 2009/WORLD/meast/02/22/iraq.abughraib/index.html.
• Dorrien G. 2004, Imperial Designs, London.
• Dziubka K., Szlachta B., Nijakowski L.M. 2008, Idee i ideologie we współczesnym świecie, Warszawa.
• Freedom House, 2003, Freedom of the World 2002–2003, New York.
• Fukuyama F. 2006, After the Neocons: America at the Crossroads, London.
• Habib A. 2010, The Deadly Lie of Democracy in Iraq, The Electronic Intifada, [online] http://electronicintifada.net/content/deadly-lie-democracy-iraq/9114.
• Halper S., Clarke J. 2004, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order, Cambridge.
• Homolar-Riechmann A. 2009, The moral purpose of US power: neoconservatism in the age of Obama, “Contemporary Politics”, vol. 15, no. 2.
• Kagan R. 2004, America’s crisis of legitimacy, “Foreign Affairs”, vol. 83, no. 2.
• Kagan R., Kristol W. 1996, Toward a neo-reaganite foreign policy, “Foreign Affairs”, vol. 5, no. 4, July/August.
• Kant I. 2005, Do wiecznego pokoju, przeł. M. Żelazny [w:] tegoż, Rozprawy z filozofii historii, Kęty.
• Kapiszewski A. 2004, Reformy polityczne w Arabii Saudyjskiej 1991–2004, „Politeja”, vol. 2.
• Kaplan L.F., Kristol W. 2003, The War Over Iraq: Saddam’s Tyranny and America’s Mission, New York.
• Karatnycky A. 2004, Gains for Freedom Amid Terror and Uncertainty [w:] Freedom of the World 2004, [online] http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2004/ essay-gains-freedom-amid-terror-and-uncertainty.
• Krauthammer C. 2005, The neoconservative convergence, “Wall Street Journal”, 21 July 2005.
• Kristol I. 1975, America now: a failure of nerve? “Commentary”, vol. 60.
• Kristol I. 2003, The Neoconservative Persuasion, “The Weekly Standard”, vol. 8, no. 47, August 25.
• Krzynówek A. 2005, Amerykańska strategia demokratyzacji Iraku: wizja, próba implementacji, perspektywy na przyszłość, „Politeja”, vol. 3, no. 1.
• Labat S. 1995, Les islamistes algériens. Entre les urnes et le maquis, Paris.
• Leiber R.J. 2009, Persistent Primacy and the Future of the American Era, “International Politics”, vol. 46, no. 2/3.
• Milczanowski M., Sawicka Z. 2013, Dwa odcienie arabskiej rewolucji: Egipt i Syria, Oświęcim.
• Nasri A.D. 2009, La charte des musulmans d'Europe vue dans le contexte français, Oslo.
• Niebylski M. 2011, Ideologia i polityczność w perspektywie neokonserwatyzmu amerykańskiego – tradycja, recepcja i współczesne implikacje, „Politeja”, vol. 17.
• Nye J. Jr. 2004, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York.
• Osman F. 2001, Islam in a Modern State: Democracy and the Concept of Shura (Occasional papers series), Georgetown.
• Otłowski T. 2009, Psychologiczne aspekty terroryzmu – zarys problemu, „Biuletyn Opinie”, 2009, nr 14.
• Podhoretz N. 1977, The culture of appeasement, “Harper’s”, 255.
• Podhoretz N. 2002, In praise of the Bush doctrine, “Commentary”, 114.
• Prostak R. 2011, Kontraktualne korzenie amerykańskiego konstytucjonalizmu. Między rozumem, doświadczeniem i wiarą, „Politeja”, vol. 17.
• Ranjan R.K., Prakash C.J. 2009, The Decline of Educational System In Iraq, “Journal of Peace Studies”, vol. 16, no. 1–2, January–June.
• Raphaeli N. 2004, Understanding Muqtada al-Sadr, “Middle East Quarterly”, vol. 4.
• Rathbun B.C. 2008, Does One Right Make a Realist? Conservatism, Neoconservatism, and Isolationism in the Foreign Policy Ideology of American Elites, “Political Science Quarterly”, vol. 123, no. 2.
• Renshon S.A. 2010, National Security in the Obama Administration: Reassessing the Bush Doctrine, New York.
• Roy D.A. 1993, The Educational System of Iraq, “Middle Eastern Studies”, vol. 29, no. 2.
• Schmidt B.C., Williams M.C. 2008, The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists, “Security Studies”, vol. 17.
• Soltani F., Jawan J.A. 2010, Compassionate Conservatism vs Bush Doctrine Conservatisme Compatissant Vs Doctrine Bush, “Cross-Cultural Communication”, vol. 6, no. 3.
• Stolarczyk A. 2010, Elementy ciągłości i zmiany w polityce zagranicznej i bezpieczeństwa Stanów Zjednoczonych w okresie administracji Billa Clintona i George’a Walkera Busha, „Studia Politicae Universitatis Silesiensis”, t. 6.
• Szlachta B. 2008, Szkice o konserwatyzmie, Kraków.
• Teixeira C.G.P. 2011, The convenient enemy – neocons, global jihadists and the road to Iraq, “Meridiano”, vol. 12, no. 126.
• Vaïsse J. 2010, Neoconservatism. The Biography of a Movement, Cambridge.
• Vall M. du 2006, Myśl polityczna Stanów Zjednoczonych: neokonserwatyzm versus paleokonserwatyzm, „Politeja”, vol. 6, no. 2.
• Bush G.W. 2001, Statement by the President in His Address to the Nation, September 11, 2001, [online] http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/ 09/ print/20010911-16.html.
• Bush G.W. 2002, President Bush Delivers Graduation Speech at West Point, United States Military Academy West Point, New York June 1, 2002, [online] http://geor gewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/06/print/20020601-3.html.
• Bush G.W. 2006, President Discusses Global War on Terror Following Briefing at CENTCOM, Tampa, Florida, February 17, [online] www.georgewbushwhitehouse. archives.gov/news/releases/2006/02/print/20060217–4.html.
• Clinton B. 1994, State of the Union Address, January 25, [online] http://millercenter.org/ president/clinton/speeches/speech-3437.
• COIN 2006, U.S. Army Field Manual: Counterinsurgency, December 15, 2006, [online] www. fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3–24.pdf.
• Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report, February 6, 2006 [online] www.comw.org/qdr/qdr2006.pdf.
• NSHS 2002, National Strategy for Homeland Security, The White House, July 2002. [online] www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/nat_strat_hls.pdf.
• NSCWMD 2002, National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, The White House, December 2002 [online] www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-wmd.pdf.
• NSCT 2003, National Strategy for Combating Terrorism, The White House, February 2003. [online] www.state.gov/documents/organization/60172.pdf.
• NSCT 2006, National Strategy for Combating Terrorism, The White House, September 2006. [online] www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/NSCT0906.pdf.
• NISUS 2005, The National Intelligence Strategy of the United States, The White House, October 2005 [online] www.dni.gov/publications/NISOctober2005.pdf.
• USNSPDSC 2007, The U.S. National Strategy for Public Diplomacy and Strategic Communication, June 2007 [online] www.state.gov/documents/organization/ 87427.pdf.
• UNESCO 2003, Situation Analysis of Education in Iraq, Paris.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15584/polispol.2019.3.6