PL EN


2014 | 50 | 4(202) | 263-280
Article title

No Miracles: What does it mean that science seeks the truth?

Content
Title variants
PL
Nic dziwnego. Co znaczy, że nauka poszukuje prawdy?
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The purpose of the following pages is to show that the rejection of Metaphysical Correspondentism doesn’t force us to reject Default Correspondentism and that the rejection of Metaphysical Realism doesn’t force us to reject Default Realism. As a consequence, we aim to disentangle the analysis of the (standard, robust, ordinary but also scientific) notion of truth from the debate between realism and anti-realism. The independence of the analysis of notions such as knowledge and assertion from the metaphysical debate follows too.
PL
Celem artykułu jest pokazanie, że odrzucenie metafizycznego korespondentyzmu nie pociąga za sobą odrzucenia domyślnego korespondentyzmu i że odrzucenie realizmu metafizycznego nie pociąga za sobą odrzucenia domyślnego realizmu. W związku z tym, staramy się oddzielić analizę (standardowego, odpornego, potocznego, ale także naukowego) pojęcia prawdy od debaty między realizmem a anty-realizmem. Wynika z tego niezależność analizy pojęć, takich jak wiedza i asercja, od debat metafizycznych.
Year
Volume
50
Issue
Pages
263-280
Physical description
Contributors
  • Department of Philosophy I, University of Granada (Spain)
References
  • Austin J., 1950, Truth, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 24: 111–129.
  • Benacerraf P., 1964, What Numbers couldn’t be, (Benacerraf and Putnam 1964, 272–294).
  • Benacerraf P., Putnam H. (eds.), 1964, Philosophy of Mathematics. Selected Readings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frápolli, M.J., 2012a, The neutrality of truth in the debate Realism vs. Anti-Realism, [in:] S. Rahman, G. Primiero, M. Marion (eds.), The Realism-Antirealism Debate in the Age of Alternative Logics: Logic, Epistemology & Unity of Science, Dordrecht: Springer, p. 85–99.
  • Frápolli M.J., 2012b, The Meaning of Truth. An updated approach to the meaning of truth ascriptions, Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Frápolli M. J., 2013, How to Naturalize Truth, [in:] M. Milkowski, K. Talmont-Kaminski (eds.), Regarding Mind, Naturally: Naturalist Approaches to the Sciences of the Mental, Cambridge Scholar Publishing, p. 262–281.
  • Frege G., 1879/1972, Conceptual Notation and Related Articles, trans. and ed. T. W. Bynum, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Frege G., 1884/1980, The Foundations of Arithmetic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Gentile N., 2013, Sobre la neutralidad de la verdad en el debate realism-antirrealismo, Contribution to the XVII Congreso Interamericano de Filosofía (SIF 2013) Salvador de Bahía (Brasil), October 7-12.
  • Haack S., 2003, Defending Science within Reason, Amherst: Prometheus Books.
  • Hilbert D., 1925/1964, On the Infinite, (Benacerraf and Putnam 1964, 183–201).
  • Musgrave A., 2007, The Miracle Argument for Scientific Realism, The Rutherford Journal 2, rutherfordjournal.org.
  • Price H., 2011, Naturalism without mirrors, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Putnam H., 1975, What is Mathematical truth?, [in:] Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 60–78.
  • Quine W.v.O., 1963, Set Theory and its Logic, Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Ryle G., 1949/2009, The Concept of Mind, London: Routledge.
  • Strawson P., 1950, Truth, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 24: 129-156.
  • Tarski A., 1941, Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences, New York: A Galaxy Book.
  • Wittgenstein L., 1969, On Certainty, ed. by D. Paul, G.E.M Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein L., 1922/1961, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Oxford: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-b8df4aa9-82ee-437f-a322-1b478889b296
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.