DIGITAL LITERACY AMONG YOUNG LEARNERS: HOW DO EFL TEACHERS AND LEARNERS VIEW ITS BENEFITS AND BARRIERS?

• Authors: Mudra Heri
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The present study aims to explore perceptions of young learners and EFL teachers towards benefits and barriers of digital literacy. Eight young learners and five EFL teachers took part in this qualitative study. In-depth semi-structured interviews were employed to collect qualitative data. The results depict that there are benefits and barriers of digital literacy for young learners in learning English. The benefits of digital literacy include improving young learners’ writing, reading, listening, and speaking skills, getting used to authentic materials, increasing frequency of digital technology use, enhancing online collaboration between teacher-learners and learners-learners. However, this study reports that digital literacy also has some negative impact for young learners. Problems with weak signals which affect difficult internet access still remain a problem. Contents of online digital materials are not easy for young learners to interpret and convert into simple, self-regulated information. Moreover, digital literacy tools are considered to be expensive. These barriers might be influenced by other problems such as complexity of digital literacy tools, different comprehension levels among young learners, young learners and EFL teachers’ lack of digital literacy experiences. In conclusion, the results give valuable insights in how to go about integration of digital literacy tools for young learners.

Keywords

EN

digital literacy; young learners; benefits; barriers; EFL teachers

• Publisher: IATEFL Poland Computer Special Interest Group & University of Nicosia
• Journal: Teaching English with Technology
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 3-24

Contributors

author

Mudra Heri

• State Islamic Institute of Kerinci

References

• Apperley, T., & Beavis, C. (2011). Literacy into action: digital games as action and text in the English and literacy classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 6(2), 130-143.
• Asmali, M. (2018). Integrating technology into ESP classes: use of student response system in English for specific purposes instruction. Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 86-104.
• Bataineh, R. F., & Baniabdelrahman, A. A. (2006). Jordanian EFL students’ perceptions of their computer literacy. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2(2), 35-50.
• Bhat, R. I. (2017). Challenges of digital literacy in higher education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 4(4), 324-325.
• Bloch, J. (2008). From the special issue editor. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 2-6.
• Brown, R., Scull, J., Nolan, A., Raban, B., & Deans, J. (2012). Young learners: mapping the beliefs and practices of preschool teachers in relation to early literacy development. The Australian Educational Researcher, 39(3), 313-331.
• Çam, E., & Kiyici, M. (2017). Perceptions of prospective teachers on digital literacy. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 29-44.
• Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Carrington, V. (2001). Emergent home literacies: A challenge for educators. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(2), 88-100.
• Carrington, V. (2005). The uncanny, digital texts and literacy. Language and Education 19(6), 467-482.
• Castro, D. C., Páez, M. M., Dickinson, D. K., & Frede, E. (2011), Promoting language and literacy in young dual language learners: research, practice, and policy. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 15-21.
• Chi, S. W., & Chan, W. M. (2011). Learning beyond the classroom: Language podcast as supplementary learning material. Ubiquitous Learning, 3(2), 21-39.
• Churchill, N. (2016). Digital Storytelling as a Means of Supporting Digital Literacy Learning in an Upper-Primary-School English Language Classroom. Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1774
• Davidson, C. (2009). Young children’s engagement with digital texts and literacies in the home: Pressing matters for the teaching of English in the early years of schooling. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 36-54.
• Demirel, Ö. (2004). Teaching Modern Foreign Languages: Language Passport, language Biography, Language Dossier. 2nd ed. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem A Publishing.
• Downes, T. (2002). Children’s and families’ use of computers in Australian homes. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(2), 182-196.
• Dzulkifli, M. A., & Mustafar, M. F. (2013). The influence of colour on memory performance: a review. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: MJMS, 20(2), 3-9.
• Education Development Center (EDC). (2018). Young Learners with Technology. New York: EDC.
• Eryansyah, E., Erlina, E., Fiftinova, F., & Nurweni, A. (2019). EFL students’ needs of digital literacy to meet the demands of 21stCentury Skills. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 3(2), 442-460. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v3i2.8297
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y. & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7(4), 421-429.
• Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2791/82116
• Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley.
• Hargittai, E. (2008). An update on survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 20(10), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439308318213
• Horton, F. W. Jr. (2008). Understanding Information Literacy: A Primer. Paris: UNESCO.
• Ibarra, F. D. E. (2018). Is Facebook beneficial for writing practice? Ecuadorian polytechnic students speak up! Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 3-17.
• Johnson, R. C. & Tweedie, M. G. (2010). Could phonemic awareness instruction be (part of) the answer for young EFL learners? A report on the Early Literacy Project in Malaysia. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 822-829.
• Johnstone, R. (2002). Addressing ‘the Age Factor’: Some Implications for Language Policy. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
• Jolls, T. (2008). The Impact of Technology on Character Education. New York: Center for Media Literacy.
• Jones-Kavalier, B., & Flannigan, S. (2006). Connecting the digital dots: Literacy of the 21st century. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(2), 8-10. Retrieved from: https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/articles/2006/4/eqm0621.pdf?la=en&hash072FD518E173153E68975F73DA646847D9736291
• Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education, 13, 179-187.
• Kaeophanuek, S., Na-Songkhla, J., & Nilsook, P. (2018). How to enhance digital literacy skills among information science students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(4), 292-297.
• Kleemans, M. & Eggink, G. (2016). Understanding news: the impact of media literacy education on teenagers’ news literacy. Journalism Education, 5(1), 75-88.
• Klein, K. 2005. Teaching young learners. English Teaching Forum, 43(1), 12-17.
• Kress, G. & Jewitt, C. (Eds.) (2003). Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
• Kurniawati, N., Maolida, E. H., & Anjaniputra, A. G. (2018). The praxis of digital literacy in the EFL classroom: digital-immigrant vs digital-native teacher. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 28-37. doi:10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11459
• Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2006a). New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Classroom Learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006b). Blogging as participation: The active sociality of a New Literacy. Presented to the American Educational Research Association, April 8-12, San Francisco, CA.
• Lawlor, B., & Donnelly, R. (2010). Using podcasts to support communication skills development: A case study for content format preferences among postgraduate research students. Computers & Education, 54(4), 962-971.
• Lawrence, S. A. (2013). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of literacy and use of technology in classroom practice: analysis of self-reported practice in one school district. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 14(1), 51-71.
• Lewin, C. (1997). Evaluating talking books: Ascertaining the effectiveness of multiple feedback modes and tutoring techniques. In C. K. Kinzer & K. A. Hinchman & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Inquiries in Literacy Theory and Practice: Forty-sixth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. pp. 360-371). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
• Li, T. Y. (2014). The computer literacy and use: The case of Taiwanese pre-service elementary school English teachers. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(1), 128-142.
• Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: A review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 547-556.
• Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56, 429-440.
• Marsh, J. (2006). Emergent media literacy: Digital animation in early childhood. Language and Education, 20(6), 493-506.
• McMinn, S. W. J. (2008). Podcasting possibilities: Increasing time and motivation in the language learning classroom. Retrieved from http://www.eife-l.org/publications/proceedings/ilf08/contribution/improving-quality-of-learning-with-technologies/McMinn.pdf.
• Meurant, R.C. (2010). iPad Tablet computing to foster Korean EFL digital literacy. International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology, 3(4), 49-62.
• Mifsud, L. (2006). What counts as digital literacy: experiences from a seventh grade classroom. In J. K. Nyiri (ed.), Mobile Understanding: The Epistemology of Ubiquitous Communication (pp. 133-143). Vienna: Passagen.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2002). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage.
• Miller, S. (2007). English teacher learning for new times: digital video composing as multimodal literacy practice. English Education, 40(1), 61-83.
• Mospan, N. (2018). Mobile teaching and learning English – A multinational perspective. Teaching English with Technology, 18(4), 105-125.
• Mudra, H. (2018). Pre-service EFL teachers’ experiences in teaching practicum in rural schools in Indonesia. The Qualitative Report, 23(2), 319-344.
• Neumann, M. M., Finger, G. & Neumann, D. L. (2017). A conceptual framework for emergent digital literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(4), 471-479.
• Ng’ambi, D. (2008). Podcasts for reflective learning. In G. Salmon & P. Edirisingha (Eds.), Podcasting for Learning in Universities (pp. 132-145). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
• Niikko, A., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2009). In search of quality in Finnish pre-school education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(5), 431-445.
• Nushi, M., & Eqbali, M. H. (2017). Duolingo: a mobile application to assist second language learning (App Review). Teaching English with Technology, 17(1), 89-98.
• Pahl, K. & Rowsell, J. (2005). Literacy and Education. Understanding the New Literacy Studies in the Classroom. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
• Paquette, K. R., & Rieg, S. A. (2008). Using music to support the literacy development of young English language learners. Early Childhood Education Journal 36, 227-232.
• Parette, H., Hourcade, J,. Dinelli, J., & Boeckmann, N. (2009). Using Clicker 5 to enhance emergent literacy in young learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 355-363.
• Perdana, R., Yani, R., Jumadi, & Rosana, D. (2019). Assessing students’ digital literacy skill in senior high school Yogyakarta. Indonesian of Education Journal, 8(2), 169-177, Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i2.17168
• Pratolo, B. W., & Solikhati, H. A. (2020). The implementation of digital literacy in Indonesian suburban EFL classes. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 1508-1512.
• Rahmah, A. (2015). Digital Literacy Learning System for Indonesian citizen. Procedia Computer Science, 72. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.109
• Rello, L., & Bighma, J. P. (2017). Good background colors for readers: A study of people with and without dyslexia. ASSETS '17 Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 72-80.
• Sen, E. (2017). Teacher Perceptions of Digital Literacy in an L2 Classroom. Thesis project with specialization on English Studies in Education. Malmö: Faculty of Education and Society, Malmö University, Sweden.
• Seok, S. & DaCosta, B. (2016). Perceptions and preferences of digital and printed text and their role in predicting digital literacy. Asian Social Science, 12(5), 14-23.
• Shahrokni, S. A. (2018). Playposit: Using interactive videos in language education (App Review). Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 105-115.
• Shopova, T. (2014). Digital literacy of students and its improvement at the university. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(2) 26-32, doi: 10.7160/eriesj.2014.070201.
• Skouge, J., Rao, K., & Boisvert, P. (2007). Promoting early literacy for diverse learners using audio and video technology. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(1), 5-11.
• Solano, L., Cabrera, P., Ulehlova, E., & Espinoza, V. (2017). Exploring the use of educational technology in EFL teaching: A case study of primary education in the south region of Ecuador. Teaching English with Technology, 17(2), 77-86.
• Supratman, L. P., & Wahyudin, A. (2017). Digital media literacy for higher education students in Indonesia. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 2(5), 51-58. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.24001/ijels.2.5.7
• Sze, P. M.-M. (2006). Developing students’ listening and speaking skills through ELT podcasts. Education Journal, 34(2), 115-134.
• Trinkle, C. (2008). Listening comprehension leads to reading success. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 24, 43-45.
• Turula, A. (2017). Learner autonomy as a social construct in the context of Italki. Teaching English with Technology, 17(2), 3-28.
• Vikneswaran, T., & Krish, P. (2015): Utilising social networking sites to improve writing: a case study with Chinese students in Malaysia. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(3), 287-300.
• Walsh, M. (2008). Worlds have collided and modes have merged: classroom evidence of changed literacy practices. Literacy, 42(2), 101-108.
• Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34, 179-225.
• Williams, P. (2006). Exploring the challenges of developing digital literacy in the context of special educational needs communities. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.11120/ital.2006.05010006.
• Yancey, K. (2009). Writing by any other name. Principal Leadership, 10(1), 26-29.
• Zuroh, E. Z., & Liansari, V. (2017). Digital age literacy in elementary school. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intellectuals' Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icigr-17.2018.29