Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 2 (47) | 242–253

Article title

The Domestic Dimension of Israeli Public Diplomacy

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The paper adds to the body of recent scholarly literature that emphasizes the role of domestic publics in public diplomacy – a field until recently examined with only minor attention to the domestic realm. It suggests conducting an analysis of the domestic dimension of public diplomacy on three levels: individual, organizational, and national. By doing so, we are able to understand in a complex manner the environment from which public diplomacy practice grows, and thus also its specific dynamics. Applying this model of analysis to the case of Israel, the paper describes major domestic factors shaping Israeli public diplomacy: the culture of individual engagement (individual level), the clash of organizational ethea of institutions responsible for public diplomacy (organizational level), and the intertwining of public diplomacy and nation-building (national level). The analysis also allows us to better grasp the dilemma faced by Israeli public diplomacy between efficiency and democratic character.

Year

Volume

Pages

242–253

Physical description

Contributors

  • Charles University in Prague (the Czech Republic)

References

  • Al-Haj, M. (2002). “Multiculturalism in Deeply Divided Societies: The Israeli case”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 26(2), pp. 169-183.
  • Appel, R., Irony, A., Schmerz, S., Ziv, A. (2008). Cultural Diplomacy: An Important but Neglected Tool in Promoting Israel’s Public Image. Herzliya: The Interdisciplinary Centre Herzliya, published online, May 2008. Retrieved from: http://portal.idc.ac.il/sitecollectiondocuments/cultural_diplomacy.pdf.
  • Arndt, R. T. (2005). The First Resort of Kings: American Cultural Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century. Washington D.C: Potomac Books Inc.
  • Attias, S. (2012). “Israel’s New Peer-to-Peer Diplomacy”. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7(4), pp. 473-482.
  • Avraham, E. (2003). “Press, Politics, and the Coverage of Minorities in Divided Societies: The Case of Arab citizens in Israel”. The International Journal of Press/Politics 8(4), pp. 7-26.
  • Avraham, E. (2009a). Public diplomacy, crisis communication strategies and managing nation branding: The Case of Israel. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Avraham, E. (2009b). Marketing and managing nation branding during prolonged crisis: The case of Israel. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 5(3), pp. 202-212.
  • Avraham, E. (2015). "The Role of Intergovernmental Organizations in the "Battle over Framing": The Case of the Israeli-West Bank Separation Barrier“. The International Journal of Press/Politics 21(1), pp. 111-133.
  • Bátora, J. (2005). Public Diplomacy in Small and Medium-Sized States: Norway and Canada. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International Relations "Clingendael”.
  • Cofman Wittes, T. (Ed.) (2005). How Israelis and Palestinians Negotiate: A cross-cultural analysis of the Oslo peace process. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.
  • Conforti, Y. (2011). “’The New Jew’ in the Zionist Movement: Ideology and Historiography.” The Australian Journal of Jewish Studies 15, pp. 87-118.
  • Cummings, J. (2016). Israel's Public Diplomacy: The Problems of Hasbara, 1966-1975. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
  • Curtis, S., & Jaine, C. (2012). “Public Diplomacy at Home in the UK: Engaging Diasporas and Preventing Terrorism”. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7(4), pp. 369-394.
  • D’Hooghe, I. (2015). China’s Public Diplomacy. Leiden: Brill – Nijhoff.
  • Frantzman, S. J. (2014). “The war online: The tragedy of the three yeshiva students has highlighted social media as the new battlefield”. The Jerusalem Post Magazine, July 4.
  • Gilboa, E. (2008). “Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy”. The Annals of the American Academy of Political Science. Vol. 616, 55-77.
  • Gonesh, A. & Melissen, J. (2005). Public Diplomacy: Improving Practice. [online] Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Retrieved from: http://www.clingendael.nl/publications/2005/20051000_cdsp_paper_diplomacy_5_gonesh_melissen.pdf.
  • Gurevich, D. (2017). “On Israeli public diplomacy”. Personal interview.
  • Hadari, G., Turgeman, A. (2016). "Chaos is the Message: The Crisis of Israeli Public Diplomacy“. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 10(3), pp. 393-404.
  • Harkham, R. D. (2015). “Understanding Israel’s Public Diplomacy Strengths and Weaknesses”. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 5(3), pp. 103–113.
  • Huijgh, E. (2012). “Public Diplomacy in Flux: Introducing the Domestic Dimension”. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7, pp. 359-367.
  • Lerner, H. (2011). Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McKie, D., & Toledano, M. (2013). Public Relations and Nation Building: Influencing Israel. New York: Routledge.
  • Melissen, J. (Ed.) (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Molad. (2012). Israeli Hasbara: Myths and Facts. A report on the Israeli Hasbara apparatus. Molad: The Center for the Renewal of Israeli Democracy. Jerusalem. Retrieved from: http://www.molad.org/images/upload/researches/79983052033642.pdf.
  • Nye, J.S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Chapter 4, Wielding Soft Power. April 5. Retrieved from: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/files/joe_nye_wielding_soft_power.pdf.
  • Osgood, K.A., & Etheridge, B. (Eds.) (2010). The United States and Public Diplomacy: New Directions in Cultural and International History. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Pánek Jurková, J. (2017). “Israeli Musicians as National Representatives”. Urban People 17 (2), pp. 339 – 352.
  • Pánek Jurková, J. (forthcoming) Cultural Representation of a Divided Society: A Case Study – Israel in the Czech Republic (Doctoral dissertation thesis). Charles University.
  • Paulmann, J. (2007). “Representation without Emulation: German Cultural Diplomacy in Search of Integration and Self-Assurance during the Adenauer Era”. German Politics and Society 82(25), pp. 168-200.
  • Pisarska, K. (2016). The Domestic Dimension of Public Diplomacy: Evaluating Success through Civil Engagement. London: Routledge.
  • Puder, J. (2016). “Netanyahu on Israel’s Public Diplomacy: Throughout Israel’s existence we could only yearn for the results we have now”. Frontpage Mag, August 2. Retrieved from: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263694/netanyahu-israels-public-diplomacy-joseph-puder.
  • Snow, N., & Taylor, P. M. (Eds.). (2001). Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge .
  • Vital, D. (1990). The Future of the Jews. A People at the Crossroads? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Yaish, M. (2001). “Class structure in a deeply divided society: Class and ethnic inequality in Israel, 1974-1991”. British Journal of Sociology 52(3), pp. 409-439.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-b99a7f8e-5806-4eb9-aa84-bba57af78282
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.