Podobne habilitacje – różne oceny – różne zakończenia

• Authors: Szwedek Aleksander

Title variants

EN

Similar Post-Doctoral Degrees, Different Opinions, Different Endings

PL

Recenzja prac Anny Bączkowskiej na temat kognitywnej analizy przyimków angielskich

PL

Recenzja książki Doroty Zielińskiej "Proceduralny model języka. Językoznawstwo z pozycji teorii modeli nauk empirycznych". 2007. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The following article addresses two reviews of post-doctoral publications, both of which are scandalous on formal and substantive levels. The key elements related to the issue are the same person (professor), acting both as a reviewer in one case, and as a committee chair in the other, along with two dramatically different final decisions concerning both post-doctoral applications. This review seeks to address two articles by Anna Bączkowska and a monograph by Dorota Zielińska-Długosz. Aside from a substantive evaluation, I address the issue of ethical conduct in relation to “Kodeks etyki pracownika naukowego” PAN (Polish Academy of Sciences Scolar’s Ethics Code). The ground of professional ethics is important not only in relation to both authors’ publications, but also to the process of post-doctoral degree procedure.

Keywords

EN

ethics; post-doctoral degree; review; Dorota Zielińska-Długosz; Anna Bączkowska; Piotr Stalmaszczyk

• Publisher: Komisja Nauk Filologicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział we Wrocławiu
• Journal: Academic Journal of Modern Philology
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 4
• Pages: 155-173

Dates

published

2016

Contributors

author

Szwedek Aleksander

• Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

References

• Austin, John (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Awdiejew, Alelsiej (red.) (1999) Gramatyka komunikacyjna. Warszawa, Kraków. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Beaugrande, Robert de (1978) „Information, Expectation, and Processing”. [W:] Poetics 7; 3–44.
• Beaugrande, Robert de, Wolfgang Dressler (1980) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
• Grice, Paul (1975) „Logic and Conversation”. [W:] Peter Cole, Jerry Morgan (red.) Syntax and Semantics. T. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press; 41–58.
• Jespersen, Otto ([1909–1949] 1961) Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. London, Copenhagen: Allen & Unwin, Einar Munksgaard.
• Jespersen, Otto (1931) Essentials of English Grammar. London. Routledge.
• Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Langacker, Ronald (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. T. 1: Theoretical Foundations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Lindstromberg, Seth ([1998] 2010) English Prepositions Explained. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Louw, Bill (1993) „Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies”. [W:] Mona Baker, Gill Francis, Elena Tognini-Bonelli (red.) Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 157–176.
• Quirk, Randolph et al. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
• Searle, John (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sinclair, John M. (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Talmy, Leonard (1988) „Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” [W:] Cognitive Science 12; 49–100.
• Twaddell, William F. (1940) The English Verb Auxiliaries. Providence: Brown University Press.
• Wróbel, Henryk (2001) Gramatyka języka polskiego. Kraków: Od Nowa.
• Barcelona, Antonio (2000) „On the Plausibility of Claiming a Metonymic Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor”. [W:] Antonio Barcelona (red.) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 3–58 (referat wygłoszony na konferencji).
• Barsov, Anton A. (1783–1788) Rossijskaja grammatika (manuskrypt).
• Beaugrande, Robert de, Wolfgang Dressler (1980) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
• Bogusławski, Andrzej (1977) Problems of the Thematic-Rhematic Structure of Sentences. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• Bolinger, Dwight (1958) „A Theory of Pitch Accent in English”. [W:] Word 14; 109–149.
• Collins, Allan, Elisabeth Loftus (1975) „A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing”. [W:] Psychological Review 82; 407–428.
• Croft, William (1993) „The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies”. [W:] Cognitive Linguistics 4; 335–370.
• Dijk, Teun van (1977) „Acceptability in Context”. [W:] Sidney Greenbaum (red.) Acceptability in Language. The Hague: Mouton; 39–61.
• Dijk, Teun van (1977) Text and Context. London: Longman.
• Gärdenfors, Peter (2007) „Cognitive Semantics and Image Schemas with Embodied Forces”. [W:] John M. Krois, Mats Rosengren, Angela Steidele, Dirk Westerkamp (red.) Embodiment in Cognition and Culture. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 57–76.
• Grice, Paul (1975) „Logic and Conversation”. [W:] Peter Cole, Jerry Morgan (red.) Syntax and Semantics. T. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press; 41–58.
• Hymen, Larry (1977) „Studies in Stress and Accent”. [W:] SC Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4; 261–302.
• Jackendoff, Ray (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Lakoff, George (1971) „On Generative Semantics”. [W:] Danny Steinberg, Leon Jakobovits (red.) Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press; 232–296.
• Lanin, Ilene (1977) „You Can Take the Sentence out of the Context, but You Can’t Take the Context out of the Mind of the Speaker”. [W:] Woodford A. Beach, Samuel E. Fox, Shulamith Philosoph (red.) Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 14-16, 1977. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society; 232–296.
• McCawley, James (1975) Review of studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar by Noam Chomsky. [W:] Studies in English Language 3; 209–311.
• Michotte, Albert, Georges Thines, Georges Crabbé (1964/1991) „Amodal Completion of Perceptual Structures”. [W:] Georges Thinès, Alan Costall, George Butterworth (red.) Michotte’s Experimental Phenomenology of Perception. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 140–167.
• Mithen, Stephen (1996) The Prehistory of Mind. London: Thames & Hudson.
• Newell, Allen, Herbert Simon (1972) Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
• Petöfi, János, Dorothea Franck (1974) Präsuppositionen in Philosophie und Linguistik / Presuppositions in Philosophy and Linguistics. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
• Postal, Paul M. (1972) „The Best Theory”. [W:] Stanley Peters (red.) Goals of Linguistic Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 131–170.
• Quillian, M. Ross (1966) Semantic Memory. Cambridge et al.: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.
• Reddy, Michael J. (1979) „The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language”. [W:] Andrew Ortony (red.) Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 284–310.
• Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco (2000) „The Role Of Mappings and Domains in Understanding Metonymy”. [W:] Antonio Barcelona (red.) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 109–132.
• Schmerling, Susan (1976) Aspects of English Sentence Stress. Austin: University of Texas Press.
• Searle, John R. (1990) „Consciousness, Explanatory Inversion, and Cognitive Science”. [W:] Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13; 585–642.
• Wierzbicka, Anna (1987) English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.