How to Be a Friendly Skeptical Theist

• Authors: Francis Jonbäck
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this paper Skeptical Theism is described, applied and defended. Furthermore, William Rowe’s position of Friendly Atheism is described and a version of Friendly Theism suggested. It is shown that Skeptical Theism can be defended against two common arguments and that skeptical theists might be able to adopt the position of Friendly Theism.

Keywords

EN

Bergmann, Michael; Friendly Atheism; Friendly Theism; Rowe, William; Skeptical Theism

• Publisher: Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
• Journal: Forum Philosophicum
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 197-210

Contributors

author

Francis Jonbäck

• University of Uppsala

References

• Almeida, Michael J., and Graham Oppy. “Sceptical Theism and Evidential Arguments from Evil.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81, no. 4 (2003): 496–516. doi:10.1080/713659758.
• Bergmann, Michael. “Commonsense Skeptical Theism.” In Reason, Metaphysics, and Mind: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga, edited by Kelly James Clark and Michael C. Rea, 9–37. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
• Fales, Evan. “Should God Not Have Created Adam?” Faith and Philosophy 9, no. 2 (1992): 193–209.
• Piper, Mark. “Skeptical Theism and the Problem of Moral Aporia.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62, no. 2 (2007): 65–79. doi:10.1007/s11153-007-9128-7.
• Plantinga, Alvin. God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967.
• Plantinga, Alvin. “Reason and Belief in God.” In Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, edited by Nicholas Wolterstorff, 16–93. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1983.
• Rowe, William L. “Friendly Atheism, Skeptical Theism, and the Problem of Evil.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59, no. 2 (2006): 79–92. doi:10.1007/s11153-005-6178-6.
• Rowe, William L. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16, no. 4 (1979): 335–341. doi:10.2307/20009775.
• Russell, Bruce. “The Persistent Problem of Evil.” Faith and Philosophy 6, no. 2 (1989): 121–319.
• Sehon, Scott. “The Problem of Evil: Skeptical Theism Leads to Moral Paralysis.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67, no. 2 (2010): 67–80. doi:10.1007/s11153-009-9213-1.
• Swinburne, Richard. The Existence of God. Revised edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
• Swinburne, Richard. Providence and the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
• Trakakis, Nick, and Yujin Nagasawa. “Skeptical Theism and Moral Skepticism.” Ars Disputandi: The Online Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4, (2004). http://www.arsdisputandi.org/publish/articles/000178/article.pdf.
• Wielenberg, Erik J. “Sceptical Theism and Divine Lies.” Religious Studies 46, no. 4 (2010): 509–523. doi:10.1017/S0034412510000247.
• Wykstra, Stephen John. “The Humean Obstacle to Evidential Arguments from Suffering: On Avoiding the Evils of ‘Appearance.’ ” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16, no. 2 (1984): 73–93. doi:10.1007/bf00136567.
• Wykstra, Stephen John. “Rowe’s Noseeum Argument from Evil.” In The Evidential Argument from Evil, edited by Daniel Howard-Snyder, 126–50. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.

Identifiers

DOI

10.5840/forphil201217213

URI

http://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=forphil&id=forphil_2012_0017_0002_0197_0210

URI

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=90443999&site=ehost-live