Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | 2/2016 (59), t.1 | 204-223

Article title

Konsumencka innowacyjności a zachowania konsumentów seniorów – wyniki badań

Content

Title variants

EN
Consumer Innovation and Senior Consumers’ Behaviour – Research Results

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest poznanie zachowań innowacyjnych konsumentów seniorów oraz ich skłonności do nabywania innowacyjnych produktów technologicznych na przykładzie telefonów komórkowych. Nowością artykułu jest zarówno temat badania realizowany w populacji seniorów, jak i zastosowana metoda pomiaru innowacyjności konsumenckiej, szeroko znana na świcie, jak dotąd niewykorzystywana w Polsce. Wyniki badań sugerują, iż konsumenci seniorzy należą do nabywców otwartych na innowacje i nie wchodzą w ich posiadanie jako ostatni, jakkolwiek dokonują ich zakupu rzadziej niż inne osoby z ich otoczenia. Konsumenci seniorzy, aby dokonać zakupu nowej wersji produktu, wymagają dodatkowych stymulatorów, w tym pozyskania informacji o specyficznych cechach nowości. Nie są grupą, która wie o innowacjach pierwsza, zatem komunikacja innowacji powinna wykorzystywać wcześniejsze grupy nabywcze rekomendujące im te produkty.
EN
The aim of this paper is to get to know an innovative behaviour of elderly consumers and their willingness to purchase innovative technology products, for example mobile phones. The novelty of this article is both the research subject examined among the elderly population and the worldwide-known measuring method used, but not employed in Poland yet. The findings suggest that elderly consumers are among the buyers who are open to innovations and are not last to acquire them. However, they purchase new products less often than other people in their circles. The elderly, when purchasing a new version of the product, require additional stimulants, including obtaining information about the specific features of the novelty. They are not a group which learns about innovation first, so communication of innovations should use a purchasing group recommending these products to the elderly.

Year

Pages

204-223

Physical description

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Gdanski, Wydzial Zarzadzania, Katedra Marketingu
author

References

  • Badowska, S. i Rogala, A. (2015). Przełamanie stereotypizacji konsumentów-seniorów a implikacje dla marketingu. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Problemy zarządzania, finansów i marketingu, (41). 11–23.
  • Badowska, S., Zamojska, A. i Rogala, A. (2015). Baby Boomers’ Attitudes toward Innovations: Empirical Research in Poland. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 1050–1056.
  • Bass, F. (1969). A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables. Management Science, 15 (5). 215–227.
  • Baumgartner, H. i Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. (1996). Exploratory Consumer Buying Behavior: Conceptualization and Measurement. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 121–137.
  • Bondos, I. (2013). Dlaczego seniorzy stanowią wyzwanie dla marketingu? Marketing i Rynek, (3). 31–36.
  • Burns, D.J. i Krampf, R.F. (1991). A Semiotic Perspective on Innovative Behavior. W:
  • R. King (red.). Developments in Marketing Science (s. 32–35). Academy of Marketing Science.
  • Flynn, L.R. i Goldsmith, R.E. (1993). A Validation of the Goldsmith and Hofacker Innovativeness Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53 (4). 1005–1116.
  • Foxall, G.R. (1984). Corporate Innovation: Marketing and Strategy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Foxall, G.R. (1988). Consumer Innovativeness: Novelty-seeking, Creativity and Cognitive Style. Research in Consumer Behavior, (3), 79−113.
  • Foxall, G.R. i Bhate, S. (1993). Cognitive Styles and Personal Involvement of Market Initiators for ‘Healthy’ Food Brands: Implications for Adoption Theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, (14). 33–56.
  • Foxall, G.R. i Haskins, C.G. (1986). Cognitive Style and Consumer Innovativeness. European Journal of Marketing, (20). 63–80.
  • Foxall, G.R., Goldsmith, R.E. i Brown, S. (1998). Consumer Psychology for Marketing. London: International Thomson Business Press.
  • Gatignon, H. i Robertson, T.S., (1991). Innovative decision processes. W: T.S. Robertson i H.H. Kassarjian (red.), Handbook of Consumer Behavior. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 316−348.
  • Goldsmith, R.E. (1996). Service Innovativeness and Price Sensitivity: An Exploratory Study. W: D.L. Morre (red.), Association of Marketing Theory and Practice Proceedings, 5, 85–91.
  • Goldsmith, R.E. i Goldsmith, E.B. (1996). An Empirical Study of Overlap of Innovativeness. Psychological Reports, 79, 1113–1114.
  • Goldsmith, R.E. i Hofacker, C.F. (1991). Measuring Consumer Innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19 (3), 209–222.
  • Goldsmith, R.E., Freiden, J.B. i Eastman, J.K. (1995). The Generality/Specificity Issue in Consumer Innovativeness Research. Technovation, 15 (10), 601–613.
  • GUS. (2014). Sytuacja demograficzna osób starszych i konsekwencje starzenia się ludności Polski w świetle prognozy na lata 2014–2050. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
  • Hirschman, E.C. (1980). Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (3), 283–295.
  • Hurt, H.T., Joseph, K. i Cook, C.D. (1977). Scales for the Measurement of Innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4 (1), 58–65.
  • Kirton, J.M. (1976). Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61 (5), 622–629.
  • Kirton, J.M. (1989). A theory of cognitive style. W: M.J. Kirton (red.), Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem Solving (s. 1–36). London: Routledge.
  • Kołodziejska, M. (2012). Obiecujący rynek. Marketing w Praktyce, (8).
  • Le Louarn, P. (1997). La tendence à innover des consommateurs: Analyse conceptuelle et proposition d’une échelle de mesure. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 12 (1), 3−20.
  • Leavitt, C. i Walton, J. (1975). Development of a Scale for Innovativeness. Advances in Consumer Research, 2 (1), 545−552.
  • Link, F. (1995). An Integrated Theory of the Willingness to Pay for Adoption of Innovations. Licentiate Thesis, (Spring).
  • Midgley, D.F. (1977). Innovation and New Product Marketing. Londres: Croom Helm.
  • Midgley, D.F. i Dowling, G.R. (1978). Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4 (4), 229−242.
  • Mudd, S. (1990). The Place of Innovativeness in Models of the Adoption Process: An Integrative Review. Technovation, 10 (2), 119–136.
  • Nam, J., Hamlin, R., Hae, J.G., Kang, J.H., Kim, J., Kumphai, P., Starr, C. i Richards, L. (2007). The Fashion-Conscious Behaviours of Mature Female Consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31 (1), 102–108.
  • NIA. (2011). Global Health and Aging. National Institute of Aging. Pozyskano z: https://www.nia.nih.gov/research/publication/global-health-and-aging/preface, 15.10.2015.
  • ONS. (2000). Population Trends. London: Office for National Statistics.
  • ONZ. (2015). World Population Prospects: The Revision 2015. New York: ONZ. Pozyskano z: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/, 15.10.2015.
  • Raju, P.S. (1980). Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics and Exploratory Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (December), 272–282.
  • Reisenwitz, T. i Iyer, R. (2007). A Comparison of Younger and Older Baby Boomers: Investigating the Viability of Cohort Segmentation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24 (4), 202–213.
  • Roehrich, G. (1995). Innovativités hédoniste et sociale: proposition d’une échelle de mesure. Recherche et Application en Marketing, 9 (2), 19–41.
  • Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer Innovativeness – Concepts and Measurements. Journal of Business Research, 57 (6), 671−677.
  • Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
  • Rogers, E.M. i Shoemaker, F.F. (1971). Communications of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
  • Snyder, C.R. i Fromkin, H.C. (1980). Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference. New York: Plenum.
  • Steenkamp, J.B.E.M., Hofstede, F. i Wedel, M. (1999). A Cross-national Investigation into the Individual and National Cultural Antecedents of Consumer Innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 63 (2), 55−69.
  • Szmigin, I. i Carrigan, M. (2000). The Older Consumer as Innovator: Does Cognitive Age Hold the Key? Journal of Marketing Management, 16 (5), 505–527.
  • Vandecasteele, B. i Geuens, M. (2010). Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept, Measurement, and Validation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27, 308–318.
  • Venkatraman, M.P. i Price, L.L. (1990). Differentiating between Cognitive and Sensory Innovativeness: Concepts, Measurement, and Implications. Journal of Business Research, 20 (4), 293−315.
  • Wang C., Wang L. i Yang Y. (2005). Innovativeness and Mobile Phone Replacement: An Empirical Study in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, (6), 280-283.
  • WHO. (2012). Ageing and Life Course. World Health Organization. Pozyskano z: http://www.who.int/ageing/en/, 30.04.2015.
  • WHO. (2016). Aging and Health. World Health Organization. Pozyskano z: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs404/en/, 01.02.2016.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
1644-9584

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-bcd2a2de-7724-4f72-a771-7f8fb7dc2636
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.