2015 | 18 | 137-149
Article title

Philicus’ “novel composition” for the Alexandrian grammarians: initial lines and iambe’s speech

Title variants
Languages of publication
The Hymn to Demeter (SH 676-80) by Philicus of Corcyra can be viewed as a combination of new and traditional features. It contains a proclamation of novelty, but, at the same time, it is rooted in the hymnic tradition; the traceable characteristics of the conventional hymn, however, are considerably modified by Philicus and practically require redefinition. What seems particularly worth emphasising is the poet’s receptiveness to other than hymnic modes of expression as well as intertextual allusions ranging in time from the archaic period to the present day. Philicus’ poem (dw#ra) is “brought” to the grammatikoi, a specific group of recipients whose opinions must have counted so much that the poet decided to address to them his hymn on par with the gods. Although it is a truism to say that the ancient hymn composers took into account two communicative settings, one formally adopted (the author/performer – the god) and one resulting from the circumstances of their performance (the author/performer – the audience/readers), it is Philicus’ merit to state explicitly what the other poets used to leave implicit. The innovativeness of Philicus’ hymn is clearly visible also in Iambe’s speech, quoted in the last part of the preserved text (SH 680.56-62). The author of the article highlights the witty contrast between her suggested uneducatedness and refined poetic diction. In Iambe’s protests can be heard the Homeric mh' ba;llete kou#roi ] Acaiw#n (Il. 3.82), the Pindaric [Ella;dov e/reisma, kleinai' Ὰya#nai (fr. 76.3) or the Hippocratean, highly technical di;aita tw#n a]nyrw;pwn (De aere, aquis et locis 1.19), comically applied to the deer. In addition, there can be found a thematic echo between Philicus and Callimachus, compare bota;nh ... e]la;fou di;aita in Philicus and mh#la ... bota;nhn ne;moito in Callimachus (Branchus, fr. 229.4 Pf.)
Physical description
  • Bing P., 1985, ‘Kastorion of Soloi’s Hymn to Pan (Supplementum Hellenisticum 310)’, AJPhil. 106, pp. 502-509.
  • Bing P., 2009, The scroll and the marble: Studies in reading and reception in Hellenistic poetry, Ann Arbor.
  • Bowie E. L., 2015, ‘Time and place, narrative and speech in Philicus, Philodamus, and Limenius’, [in:] A. Faulkner, O. Hodkinson (eds.), Hymnic narrative and the narratology of Greek hymns, Leiden–Boston, pp. 87-118.
  • Brown C. G., 1990, ‘Honouring the Goddess: Philicus’ Hymn to Demeter’, Aegyptus 70, pp. 173-189.
  • Cameron A., 1995, Callimachus and his critics, Princeton.
  • D’Angour A., 2011, The Greeks and the new: Novelty in ancient Greek imagination and experience, Cambridge.
  • Danielewicz J., 1976, Morfologia hymnu antycznego, Poznań.
  • Danielewicz J., 2001, ‘Metatext and its functions in Greek lyric poetry’, [in:] S. J. Harrison (ed.), Text, ideas, and the classics: Scholarship, theory, and classical literature, Oxford, pp. 46-61.
  • Day J. W., 2010, Archaic Greek epigram and dedication: Representation and reperformance, Cambridge.
  • Depew M., 2007, ‘Springs, nymphs, and rivers: Models of origination in third-century Alexandrian poetry’, [in:] A. Bierl et al. (ed.), Literatur und Religion, Berlin, pp. 141-169.
  • Fantuzzi M., Hunter R., 2004, ‘Marginal aberrations?’, [in:] M. Fantuzzi, R. Hunter, Tradition and innovation in Hellenistic poetry, Cambridge, pp. 37-41.
  • Furley W. D., Bremer J. M., 2001, Greek hymns, vol. I: The texts in translation, Tübingen.
  • Fraser P. M., 1972, Ptolemaic Alexandria I. Text, Oxford.
  • Furley W. D., 2009, ‘Philikos’ Hymn to Demeter’, Paideia 64, pp. 483-507.
  • Giuseppetti M., 2012, ‘Gods and religion in Hellenistic poetry’, [in:] M. A.
  • Harder, R. F. Regtuit, G. C. Wakker (eds.), Gods and religion in Hellenistic poetry, Leuven–Paris–Walpole, pp. 103-128.
  • Hunter, R. Rengakos A., Sistakou E. (eds.), 2014, Hellenistic studies at a crossroads: Exploring texts, contexts and metatexts, Berlin–Boston.
  • Körte A., 1931, ‘Der Demeter-Hymnos des Philikos’, Hermes 66, pp. 442-454.
  • Krevans N., Sens A., 2006, ‘Language and literature’, [in:] G. R. Bugh (ed.), The Cambridge companion to the hellenistic world, Cambridge, pp. 186-207.
  • Kwapisz J., 2013, The Greek figure poems, Leuven–Paris–Walpole.
  • Latte K., 1954, ‘Demeterhymnos des Philikos’, MH 11, pp. 11-19.
  • Lloyd-Jones H., Parsons P. J., 1983, Supplementum Hellenisticum, Berlin– New York.
  • Ophuisen J. M. van, 1987, Hephaistion on Metre, Leiden–New York–København–Köln.
  • Petrovic I., 2012, ‘Rhapsodic hymns and epyllia’, [in:] M. Baumbach, S. Bär, Brill’s companion to Greek and Latin epyllion and its reception, Leiden, pp. 149-176.
  • Pfeiffer R., 1968, History of classical scholarship, Oxford.
  • Previtali C., 1969, ‘Filico di Corcira e Callimaco’, SIFC 41, pp. 13-18.
  • Provenzale F., 2008-2009, Filico di Corcira: testimonianze e frammenti. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento, Roma.
  • Richardson N. J., 1974, The Homeric Hymn to Demeter, Oxford.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.