On the So-Called Asian Values Once Again

• Authors: Jelonek Adam
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Over the period of the last two or three decades, East Asia has achieved remarkable success. It is hard to imagine today that yet in the 1960s this region was among the poorest in the world. Since then, a fierce discussion has started over the direction s of Asian modernity. With some influences of the Huntingtonian thesis placing cultural differences at the forefront in explaining international instabilities, several scholars have started quite seriously asking questions about the potential linkages between cultural values and political change in East Asia. In this article, I shall attempt to answer how important the role of cultural factors was in bringing about the general change of image of contemporary Asian communities and economies. After making a few preliminary comments on the theoretical relations between culture and development, I shall proceed to indicate some basic elements of both scientific and political discourse, concerning a concept of the so-called Asian values, which is presented as an example of a highly-ideological attempt at contrasting the two following cultural and social contexts: Asian and Western. In the conclusion, I shall try to contrast some myths about the cultural differences with the results of empirical research

Keywords

EN

Asian values; East Asian societies; cultural traditions

• Publisher: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
• Journal: Acta Asiatica Varsoviensia
• Year: 2015
• Issue: 28
• Pages: 25-38

Dates

published

2015-12-01

Contributors

author

Jelonek Adam

• University of Cracow

References

• Alexander, K.C., Kumaran P.P. 1992. Culture and Development: Cultural Patterns in Areas of Uneven Development, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Banfield, E. 1958. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society, New York: The Free Press.
• Berger, B.M. 1995. An Essay on Culture: Symbolic Structure and Social Structure, Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Berger, P.L. 1995. Rewolucja kapitalistyczna, Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa [Berger, P.L. 1987. The Capitalist Revolution, New York, Basic Books]
• Chao, L., Myers R.H.. 1998. The First Chinese Democracy: Political Life in the Republic of China on Taiwan, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: Free Press.
• Gao, X. 1996. Culture and Development: Macro-cultural Reflections on Development in: Culturelink, nr 20.
• Gawlikowski, K. 2001. Jednostka i władza w cywilizacji wschodnioazjatyckiej, in: Gawlikowski, K., Potocka E. (ed.) Korea, doświadczenia i perspektywy, Toruń: Marszałek.
• Hall, E.T., Reed H.M. 1990. Understanding Cultural Differences, Yarmouth: Intercultural Press, Inc.
• Harrison, L. 1985. Underdevelopment Is a State of Mind, Lanham: University Press of America.
• Harrison, L. 1997. The Pan-American Dream – Do Latin America’s Cultural Values Discourage True Partnership with the United States and Canada, New York: Basic Books.
• Hitchcock, D.I. 1994. Asian Values and the United States: How Much Conflict?, Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
• Huntington, S.P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
• Huntington, S.P. 1993. The Clash of Civilizations? in: Foreign Affairs, Summer.
• Ishihara, Sh. 1992. The Japan That Can Say No. Why Japan Will Be First Among Equals, New York: Touchstone Books.
• Jamieson, I. 1980. Capitalism and Culture: A Comparative Analysis of British and American Manufacturing Organizations, London: Gower.
• Jelonek, A.W. (ed.) 2004. Młodzież wietnamska. Systemy wartości. Stereotypy Zachodu, Warszawa: Scholar.
• Kroeber, A.L., Kluckhohn C. 1952. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions, in: Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology, nr 1, Vol. XLVII.
• Leipziger, D.M., Vinod T. 1993. The Lessons of East Asia: An Overview of Country Experience, Washington: World Bank.
• Lewis, W.A. 1955. The Theory of Economic Growth, Homewood: Irwin.
• Myrdal, G. 1968. Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
• North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Rohwer, J. 1995. Asia Rising, New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Schumpeter, J. 1961. The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Tomala, K. 2001. Prawa człowieka w Chińskiej Republice Ludowej, in: Tomala, K. (ed.) Chiny. Przemiany państwa i społeczeństwa w okresie reform 1978–2000, Warszawa: TRIO.
• Tu, W.-M. 1994. Humanizm konfucjański a demokracja, in: Michalski, K. (ed.) Europa i społeczeństwo obywatelskie; rozmowy w Castel Gandolfo, Kraków: Znak.
• Wan, H. 1983. Race Relations in Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Educational Books.
• Weber, M. 1984. Szkice z socjologii religii, Warszawa: KiW [Weber, M. 2002. The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books]