Demythologizing Christian Philosophy: An Outline

• Authors: Mezei Balázs M.
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this paper I investigate the tradition of “philosophy” and “philosopher” with respect to their importance in Christianity. I argue that the meaning of the traditional notion of philosophy as an abstract science has importantly changed. The reason for this is that the “cosmo-theological” character of traditional philosophy proved to be untenable. If this pattern is not valid in our days, then the question arises if the role of philosophy, as conceived during the Christian centuries, can be continued in and beyond our age. My answer has two aspects: on the one hand, the cosmo-theological character of philosophy needs to be explored or “demythologized;” on the other hand, Christian thought still has the potential to open itself to a future renewal. Thinking philosophically is a fundamental human feature, and I suggest that “trying to become wise,” the striving for the discovery and realization of the meaningfulness of reality is still the main concern of human beings reflecting on their historical existence today. In this sense, the encyclical letter of Fides et ratio by John Paul II offers guidance, inasmuch as its author calls for “courage” in thinking. Following this call, the present paper contends that the three mains tasks of a Christian philosophy today are as follows: 1. A sufficient understanding of the tradition determined by cosmo-theology; 2. A sufficient understanding of the importance of the trauma of totalitarianism of the twentieth century as the dividing line between tradition and contemporary reflections; and 3. A sufficient understanding of human beings striving to grasp the meaning of personhood in an open universe on the basis of the meaningfulness of reality.

Keywords

EN

Christian philosophy; cosmo-theology; Auschwitz; faith and reason

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
• Journal: Logos i Ethos
• Year: 2013
• Issue: 2(35)
• Pages: 109–146

Contributors

author

Mezei Balázs M.

• Katolicki Uniwersytet Pétera Pázmánya na Węgrzech

References

• A. MacIntyre, After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory, University of Notre Dame Press 1984.
• A. MacIntyre, After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory, University of Notre Dame Press 1984.
• A. N. Whitehead, Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology, New York 1979.
• Aristotle, De sensu, transl. by J. I. Beare, see: www.ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/sense [28.03.2013].
• Aristotle, Metaphysics.
• Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics.
• Ayres, Lewis, ed., The Oxford Handbook for Catholic Theology, Oxford 2013.
• B. Mezei, Reason and Revelation after Auschwitz, New York 2013.
• C. Claudianus, Works, London 1922.
• C. S. Lewis’ The Discarded Image, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964.
• Cicero, On the Commonwealth.On the Law, ed. by James E. G. Zetzel, Cambridge, CUP, 1999.
• E. Gilson, The Spirit of Mediaeval Philosophy, transl. A. H. C. Downes, University of Notre Dame Press 1991.
• E. T. H. Brann, The Music of the Republic: Essays on Socrates’ Conversations and Plato’s Writings, Philadelphia 2004.
• F. Cumont, Astrology and Religion among the Greeks and Romans, New York 1960.
• G. Betegh, Le probleme des representations visuelles dans la cosmologie presocratique: pour une histoire de la modelisation’, [in:] Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Presocratique?/What is Presocratic Philosophy?, ed. A. Laks, C. Louget, Lille 2002, p. 381–415.
• Hadot, Pierre: Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique? Paris 1996.
• J. B. Metz, Memoria passionis. Ein provozierendes Gedachtnis in pluralistischer Gesellschaft, Freiburg–Basel–Wien 2006.
• J. F. Crosby, Personalist Papers, Washington 2004.
• Jan Assmann, Moses the Egyptian, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.
• Jan Patočka’s Negative Platonism: Reflections concerning the Rise, the Scope and the Demise of Metaphysics—and Whether Philosophy Can Survive It, [in:] idem, Philosophy and Selected Writings, ed. and transl. E. Kohak, Chicago–London 1989, p. 175–206.
• John Paul II, Pope: Encyclical letter Fides et Ratio.
• Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, part 2, Conclusion: http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/5683/pg5683.html [28.03.2013].
• Kant, Critique of Pure Reason.
• Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, transl. M. Gregor, Cambridge 1998.
• M. Heidegger, The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking, [in:] idem, Basic Writings, ed. D. Farrell Krell, San Francisco 1993.
• M. Maroth, Die Araber und die antike Wissenschaftstheorie, Leiden, New York 1994.
• Plato, Critias.
• Plato, Phaedo.
• Plato, Republic.
• Plato, Theaetetus.
• Plato, Timaeus.
• Pope Leo XIII, Aeterni Patris.
• R. Spaemann, Persons: The Difference between ‘Someone’ and ‘Something’, Oxford–New York 2006.
• S. Hawking, The Grand Design, co-authored by Leonard Mlodinov, New York 2010.
• S. T. Katz, S. Biderman, G. Greenberg, Wrestling with God. Jewish Theological Responses during and after the Holocaust, Oxford 2007.
• Thomas, Summa theologiae.
• Whitehead, Review of J. H. Randall’s, Aristotle. The Objectivist Newsletter, May 1963.