An intuitive app generator and accompanying e-learning modules as examples of successful assistive technology

• Authors: Brzezińska Magdalena
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this article, the author, who was a member of the Erasmus+ Count Me In Too project, endeavors to demonstrate that the assistive technology developed within the project provides effective context-aware assistance for people with learning difficulties, for whom the project was aimed. She discusses in detail the intuitive app generator created by eLearning Studios (Coventry, Great Britain), 2 (of 11) training apps designed by Teatr Grodzki (Bielsko-Biala, Poland), and the e-learning modules supplementing the apps, with theoretical foundation laid by Eldeberry AB (Hägersten, Sweden). The author shows how personalized IT tools facilitate education and improve job performance of people with disabilities, thus helping them achieve personal and professional success. The partners were, among others, motivated by the fact that European societies and job markets are gradually becoming more inclusive towards people with disabilities. The tools were successfully tested with over 300 learners in Denmark, Hungary, and Poland, and assessed by the project partners and vocational education and training specialists. The research proved that the tools, translated into national languages and forming a bank of educational resources to be followed or adapted by interested users, may inspire teachers, managers, and supervisors, and facilitate vocational training and other types of e-learning.

Keywords

EN

assistive technology; app generator; training apps; e-learning modules; context-aware assistance

• Publisher: Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie
• Journal: e-mentor
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 2 (74)
• Pages: 19-26

Contributors

author

Brzezińska Magdalena

• Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

References

• Bonk, C.J. (2016). Keynote: What is the State of E-learning? Reflections on 30 Ways Learning is Changing. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 20(2), 6-20.
• Bonk, C.J. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution Meets the Fourth E-Learning Revolution. Immersive Learning Research Network Proceedings, 3-4. Retrieved from: http://castor.tugraz.at/doku/iLRN2017/iLRN2017paper03.pdf.
• Crossland, A., Gray, T., Reynolds, J., Wellington, D., Zhou, A. (2016). Digital Accessibility Toolkit. What Education Leaders Need to Know. American Institutes for Research.
• Europeans and Their Languages Report (2012). European Commission. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf.
• Employment Statistics (2017). EUROSTAT. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Employment_statistics.
• Grammenos, S. (2013). European Comparative Data on Europe 2020 & People with Disabilities. Centre for European Social and Economic Policy (CESEP ASBL). Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1569&context=gladnetcollect.
• Hayes, H.B. (2013). How Technology is Helping Special-Needs Students Excel. EdTech Magazine. Retrieved from: https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2013/03/how-technology-helping-special-needs-students-excel.
• Lefever, R., Currant, B. (2010). How Can Technology Be Used to Improve the Learner Experience at Points of Transition? Review of peer reviewed academic literature, national and international resources and examples of projects and initiatives within higher education institutions literature. Bradford: University of Bradford.
• Literacy in Europe: Facts and figures (2015). ELINET. Retrieved from: http://www.eli-net.eu/fileadmin/ELINET/Redaktion/Factsheet-Literacy_in_Europe-A4.pdf.
• Krakower, B., LePage Plante, S. (2016). Using Technology to Engage Students with Learning Disabilities. Thousand Oaks: A SAGE Company.
• Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). Mobile Learning for Quality Education and Social Inclusion. Retrieved from: http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214679.pdf.
• McKnight, L., Davies, Ch. (2012). Current Perspectives on Assistive Learning Technologies. Oxford: University of Oxford.
• Retova, J., Polya, A. (2012). The Accessibility of E-learning Systems for Disabled. Studia Commercialia Bratislaviensa, Vol. 5, 17(1), 124-130.
• Song, D., Bonk, C. (2016). Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Education, Vol. 3, Issue 1. Retrieved from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1205838?scroll=top&needAccess=true.
• Stetter, M.E., Hughes, M.T. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to enhance the reading comprehension of struggling readers: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(4), 1-16.
• Wong, W. (2016). Nonprofits Use Technology to Empower People with Disabilities. BizTech Magazine. Retrieved from: https://biztechmagazine.com/article/2016/09/nonprofits-use-technology-empower-people-disabilities.
• Young, G., MacCormack, J. (2014). Assistive Technology for Students with Learning Disabilities. Retrieved from: https://www.ldatschool.ca/assistive-technology.