Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2015 | 19 | 107-128

Article title

Both sides matter? Reading Greek vases using pictorial semiotics. The problem of syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations of the image

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
This paper explores the possibilities of using methods of analysis from the field of pictorial semiotics in studying Greek vase painting, and thus resolving the problem of interpreting multiple scenes on a single vase. Its aim is to explain and clarify basic notions connected to this discipline, such as imagery, syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations, and how they relate to Greek iconography, using various examples. The main premise is that the separate scenes on the artifact are connected syntagmatically and not only paradigmatically as it is usually indicated, thus the joint interpretation always precedes the analysis of detached scenes, the latter being dependent upon the syntagmatic reducibility of the image.

Year

Volume

19

Pages

107-128

Physical description

Contributors

References

  • Amyx D. 1988. Corinthian Vase-Painting of the Archaic Period. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.
  • Anderson J. K. 1991. Hoplite weapons and offensive arms. In V. D. Hanson (ed.), Hoplites, the Classical Greek Battle Experience, 15–37. London, New York.
  • Barthes R. 1972. Mythologies, trans. A. Lavers. London.
  • Barthes R. 1977a. Image, Music, Text, trans. S. Heath. London.
  • Barthes R. 1977b. Rhetoric of the image. In R. Barthes 1977a, 32–51.
  • Barthes R. 1977c. Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives. In R. Barthes 1977a, 79–124.
  • Barthes R. 1986. Elements of Semiology, trans. A. Lavers and C. Smith. New York (11th printing).
  • Barthes R. 1999. Śmierć autora, trans. M. P. Markowski, Teksty Drugie 1/2 (54/55), 247–252.
  • Beard M. 1991. Adopting an aproach 2. In T. Rasmussen and N. Spivey (eds.), 12–35.
  • Bérard C. 1983. Iconographie – iconologie – iconologique. Études de Lettres 4, 5–31.
  • Bérard C. (ed.) 1989. A City of Images: Iconography and Society in Ancient Greece, trans. D. Lyons. Princeton.
  • Bérard C. and Durand J.-L. 1989. Entering the imaginery. In C. Bérard (ed.), 23–38.
  • Casson L. 1958. Hemiolia and triemiolia. JHS 78, 14–18.
  • Casson L. 1967. The Ancient Mariners. New York (4th printing).
  • Cartledge P. A. 1977. Hoplites and heroes: Sparta’s contribution to the technique of ancient warfare. JHS 97, 11–27.
  • Chandler D. 2007. Semiotics. The Basics. London, New York (2nd ed.). D’Acunto M. 2013. Il mondo del vaso Chigi. Pittura, guerra e società a Corinto alla metà del VII secolo a.C. Berlin.
  • De Miro E. and Fiorentini G. 1980. L’attivita della Soprintendenza Archeologica di Agrigento dal 1976 al 1980. Beni Culturali e Ambientali Sicilia 1/1–4, 113–137.
  • Ducrey P. 1985. Guerre et guerriers dans la Grèce antique. Fribourg.
  • Dunbabin T. J. (ed.) 1962. Perachora. The Sanctuaries of Hera Akraia and Limenia, vol 2. Oxford.
  • Feynman R. 1974. Cargo cult science. Engineering and Science 37/7 (June), 10–13.
  • Feynman R. 1989. Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!: Adventures of a Curious Character. New York.
  • Ferrari G. 2003. Myth and genre on Athenian vases. ClAnt 22/1, 37–54.
  • Frontisi-Ducroux F. 1989. In the mirror of the mask. In C. Bérard (ed.), 150–165.
  • Gill D. W. J. 1991. Pots and trade: spacefillers or objets d’art? JHS 111, 29–47.
  • Greenhalgh P. A. L. 1973. Early Greek Warfare. Horsmen and Chariots in Homeric and Archaic Ages. Cambrigde.
  • Hannestad L. 2001. War and Greek art. In T. Bekker-Nielsen and L. Hannestad (eds.), War as a Cultural and Social Force: Essays on Warfare in Antiquity, 110–119. Copenhagen.
  • Hoffmann H. 1977. Sexual and Asexual Pursuit: a Structuralist Approach to Greek Vase Painting. London.
  • Hoffmann H. 1994. The riddle of the Sphinx: a case study in Athenian immortality symbolism. In I. Morris (ed.), Classical Greece, 71–80. Cambridge.
  • Hoffmann H. 1997. Sotades: Symbols of Immortality on Greek Vases. Oxford.
  • Hurwit J. W. 1985. Art and Culture of Early Greece 1100–480 BC. New York.
  • Hurwit J. W. 2002. Reading the Chigi vase. Hesperia 7, 1–22.
  • Jakobson R. 1971a. Results of the ninth international conference of linguists. In R. Jakobson (1971c), 593–602.
  • Jakobson R. 1971b. Retrospect. In R. Jakobson (1971c), 711–722.
  • Jakobson R. 1971c. Selected Writings. Vol. 2: Word and Language. The Hague.
  • Jameson M. 1994. Response. In I. Morris (ed.), 193–196.
  • Karo G. 1899–1901. Vase der Sammlung Chigi. AntDenk 2/4, 7–8, Taf. 44–45.
  • Kucypera P. and Wadyl S. 2012. Kultura materialna. In. S. Tabaczyński, A. Marciniak, D. Cygnot and A. Zalewska (eds.), Przeszłość społeczna. Próba konceptualizacji, 614–626. Poznań.
  • Leśniak A. 2013. Ikonofilia. Francuska semiologia pikturalna i obrazy. Warsaw.
  • Lissarrague F. 1989. The world of warrior. In C. Bérard (ed.), 39–52.
  • Lissarrague F. 1990. L’Autre guerrier. archers, peltastes, cavaliers, dans l’imagerie attique. Paris, Rome.
  • Lorimer H. L. 1947. The hoplite phalanx. BSA 42, 76–138.
  • Marconi C. 2004. Images for a warrior. On a group of Athenian vases and their public. In C. Marconi (ed.), Greek Vases, Images, Context and Controversies. Proceedings of the Conference Sponsored by The Center for the Ancient Mediterranean at Columbia University, 23–24 March 2002, 27–40. Leiden, Boston.
  • Matthew Ch. A. 2012. A Storm of Spears. Understanding the Greek Hoplite at War. Barnsley.
  • Miścicki W. 2012. Thoughts on changes in Greek warfare during the Archaic period with reference to the representation of the phalanx in contemporary art. SAAC 16, 85–104.
  • Miścicki W. 2014. Miasto obrazów. Jak czytać i interpretować zabytkigreckiego malarstwa wazowego. Nowy Filomata 18/1, 86–96.
  • Morris I. (ed.) 1994a. Classical Greece: Ancient Histories and Modern Archaeologies. Cambridge.
  • Morris I. 1994b. Archaeologies of Greece. In I. Morris (ed.), 8–48.
  • Mugione E. and Benincasa A. (eds.) 2012. L’Olpe Chigi. Storia di un agalma. Atti del Convegno internazionale, Salerno, 3–4 giugno 2010. Salerno.
  • Muth S. 2008. Gewalt im Bild. Das Phänomen der medialen Gewalt im Athen des 6. und 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Berlin, New York.
  • Nilsson M. P. 1929. Die Hoplitentaktik und das Staatwesen. Klio 22, 240–249.
  • Olsen B. 2013. W obronie rzeczy, archeologia i ontologia przedmiotów,trans. B. Shallcross. Warsaw.
  • Pfuhl E. 1923. Malerei und Zeichnung der Griechen. Munich.
  • Rasmussen T. 1991. Corinth and the orientalising phenomenon. In T. Rasmussen and N. Spivey (eds.), 57–78.
  • Rasmussen T. and Spivey N. (eds.) 1991. Looking at Greek Vases. Cambridge.
  • Rotroff S. I. 1998. Review: Michael Shanks, Classical archaeology of Greece: experiences of the discipline. Bryn Mawr Classical Review 1998.11.13. Retrieved from http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/1998/1998-11- 13 (status as of Nov. 20th, 2015).
  • Salmon J. 1977. Political hoplites? JHS 97, 84–101.
  • Saussure F. de [1916] 1983. Course in General Linguistics, trans. R. Harris. London.
  • Schwartz A. 2009. Reinstating the Hoplite. Stuttgart.
  • Shapiro H. A. 2000. Modest athletes and liberated women: Etruscan on Attic black-figure vases. In B. Cohen (ed.), Not the Classical Ideal, 313–337. Leiden, Boston, Cologne.
  • Shanks M. 1996. Classical Archaeology of Greece: Experiences of the Discipline. London.
  • Shanks M. 1999. Art and the Early Greek State. An Interpretive Archaeology. Cambridge.
  • Small J. P. 1999. Time in space: narrative in Classical art. The Art Bulletin81/4, 562–575.
  • Smith C. 1890. A Protocorinthian lekythos in the British Museum. JHS 11, 167–180.
  • Snodgrass A. M. 1965. Hoplite reform and history. JHS 85, 110–122.
  • Snodgrass A. M. 1999. Arms and Armor of the Greeks. Baltimore.
  • Stansbury-O’Donnell M. D. 1999. Pictorial Narrative in Ancient Greek Art. Cambridge.
  • Steiner A. 2007. Reading Greek Vases. Cambridge.
  • Stewart A. 1983. Stesichoros and the François Vase. In W. G. Moon (ed.), Ancient Greek Art and Iconography, 53–74. Madison.
  • Stewart A. 1987. Narrative, genre and realism in the work of Amasis Painter. In J. Paul Getty Museum, Papers on the Amasis Painter and his World. A Colloquium Sponsored by the Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities and a Symposium Sponsored by the J. Paul Getty Museum, 29–42. (Getty Trust Publications; Getty Trust Publications: J. Paul Getty Museum Series). Malibu.
  • Viggiano G. F. and Wees H. van 2013. The arms, armor, and iconography of early Greek hoplite warfare. In D. Kagan and G. F. Viggiano, Men of Bronze, Hoplite Warfare in Ancient Greece, 57–73. Princeton.
  • Washburn O. 1906. Eine protokorinthische Lekythos in Berlin. JdI 21, 116–127.
  • Wees H. van 2000. The development of the hoplite phalanx: iconography and reality in the seventh century. In van Wees H. (ed.), War and Violence in Ancient Greece, 125–166. London.
  • Wees H. van 2004. Greek Warfare: Myths and Realities. London.
  • White O. 1965. Parliament of a Thousand Tribes. London.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-c2d7df04-20fc-4a01-b524-ba533214abcd
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.