DETERMINANTS OF LEVERAGE AND LIQUIDITY AND BANK SIZE – CROSS-COUNTRY STUDY
Languages of publication
This paper aims to identify the role of bank size for the sensitivity of leverage and liquidity funding risk to their determinants (both bank-specific and macroeconomic). Applying the two-step robust GMM estimator to individual bank data from over 60 countries covering the period 2000–2011 our study shows that increases in previous period funding liquidity risk are associated with increases in leverage in the full sample and in large banks, but not in other banks. The liquidity of large banks tends also to increase with leverage levels. With reference to the impact of macroeconomic conditions on leverage of banks we find that leverage of large banks is the most procyclical during a crisis period. Liquidity risk is procyclical during non-crisis periods. However, during a crisis period this liquidity risk is countercyclical, consistent with the view that even slight improvements in macroeconomic environment do not stimulate banks to increase their exposure to this risk. Such effect is particularly strong in the case of large banks. Generally, such counter-cyclicality of liquidity risk of large banks may result in weaker access to the bank financing necessary to stimulate investments in the real economy during a crisis period. This may have further negative consequences for the real economy, generating an extended period of sluggish economic growth.
- Acharya V.V., Viswanathan S., (2010) Leverage, Moral Hazard and Liquidity. NBER Working Paper Np. 15837.
- Adrian T., Shin H.S. (2010) Liquidity and Leverage. Staff Report No. 328. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
- Bank of England (2009) The role of macroprudential policy. A Discussion Paper. Bank of England: November 2009.
- Beck T., Demirgüç-Kunt A., Levine R. (1999) A New Database on Financial Development and Structure. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2146.
- Beck T., Demirgüç-Kunt A., Levine R. (2009) Financial Institutions and Markets across Countries and over Time. Data and Analysis. Policy Research Working Paper 4943, World Bank.
- Beck T., Levine R. (2002) Industry growth and capital allocation: does having a marketor bank-based system matter? Journal of Financial Economics 64: 147–180.
- Blundell R., Bond S. (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data model. J Econom 87: 115–143.
- Cerutti E., Claessens S., Laeven L. (2015) The Use and Effectiveness of Macroprudential Policies: New Evidence. IMF Working Paper IMF/15/61.
- Claessens S., Ghosh S.R., Mihet R. (2014) Macro-Prudential Policies to Mitigate Financial System Vulnerabilities. IMF Working Paper WP/14/155.
- Committee on the Global Financial System CGFS. (2012) Operationalising the selection and application of macroprudential instruments. CGFS Papers No 48. Bank for International Settlements, 2012.
- Committee on the Global Financial System CGFS. (2009) The role of valuation and leverage in procyclicality. CGFS papers No. 33.
- De Haan J., Poghosyan T. (2012) ‘Bank size, market concentration and bank earnings volatility in the US’, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions, and Money 22: 35–54.European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), (2014a) The ESRB Handbook on Operationalising Macro-Prudential Policy in the Banking Sector. European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), (2014b) Flagship Report on MacroPrudential Policy in the Banking Sector.
- Flannery M.J., James C.M. (1984) The effect of interest rate changes on the common stock returns of financial institutions. Journal of Finance 39(4): 1141–1153.
- Freixas X., Loranth G., Morrison A.D. (2007), ‘Regulating financial conglomerates’, Journal of Financial Intermediation 16: 479–514.
- Haq M., Heaney R., (2012) Factors determining European bank risk. Journal of Internatianal Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 22: 696–718.
- Kane E.J., Unal H. (1988) Change in market assessment of deposit-institution riskiness. Journal of Financial Services Research 1(3): 207–229.
- Konishi M., Yasuda Y., (2004) Factors affecting bank risk taking: evidence from Japan. Journal of Banking and Finance 28: 117–232.
- Laeven L., Ratnovski L., Tong, H., 2014. Bank Size and Systemic Risk, Staff Discussion Notes 14/4, IMF, Washington, D.C.
- Lim C., Columba F., Costa A., Kongsamut P., Otani A., Saiyid M., Wezel T., Wu X., 2011. Macroprudential Policy: What Instruments and How to Use Them? Lessons from Country Experiences. IMF Working Paper 11/238.
- Myers S., Majluf N., 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13: 187–221
- Olszak M., Pipień M. (2014) Cross country linkages as determinants of procyclicality of loan loss provisions. European Journal of Finance.
- Olszak M., Pipień M., Kowalska I., Roszkowska S. (2016) What drives heterogeneity of cyclicality of loan loss provisions in the EU? Journal of Financial Services Research, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10693-015-0238-6?wt_mc=internal. event.1.SEM.ArticleAuthorOnlineFirst
- Repullo R. (2004) Capital requirements, market power, and risk-taking in banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation 13: 156–182.
- Roodman D. (2009) Practitioners Corner: A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 71: 135–158.
- Schooner H.M., Taylor M.W. (2010) Global Bank Regulation. Principles and Policies. Elsevier, Academic Press.
- Stiglitz JE (2010) Freefall. America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy. New York, Norton.
- Stiroh K.J. (2006) New evidence on the determinants of bank risk. Journal of Financial Services Research 30: 464–472.
Publication order reference