PL EN


2020 | 2(18) | 57-74(18)
Article title

PODEJŚCIA TEORETYCZNE DO BADANIA DEMOKRATYZACJI I AUTOKRATYZACJI NA POZIOMIE LOKALNYM I REGIONALNYM

Authors
Content
Title variants
EN
THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO STUDYING DEMOCRATIZATION AND AUTOCRATIZATION AT THE LOCAL AND REGIONAL LEVELS
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
In the literature on democratization and autocratization, one of the areas which clearly shows a gap in the theoretical framework is a very important territorial dimension of theseprocesses. This article is aimed at proposing the theoretical approaches based on two main pillars, which can be used in studies on democratization and autocratization at the subnational levels. The first one refers to democracy and changes of political regimes (approaches to democratization / autocratization and more static issues of the quality of democracy and local democracy). The second one refers to the territorial politics, accounting for the multilevel and network governance as well as theories of decentralization. Eventually, the author also presents possible preliminary directions of research, within which the territorial politics can be either an independent, alternatively intervening variable (studies on causes of changes regarding the political regime) or a dependent variable (analysis of effects of these changes).
Year
Issue
Pages
57-74(18)
Physical description
Contributors
  • Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Studiów Międzynarodowych, Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927 Warszawa, e-mail: ar.szymanski@uw.edu.pl, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6374-2736
References
  • Antoszewski, A. (2016). Współczesne teorie demokracji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.
  • Antoszewski, A. (2018). Demokracja nieliberalna jako projekt polityczny. Przegląd Europejski, 2, 11–31. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.0788
  • Antwi-Boasiako, K.B. i Csanyi, P. (red.). (2015). The Theories of Decentralization and Local Government: Implementation, Implications and Realities. A Global Perspective. Nacogdohes: Stephen F. Austin University Press.
  • Baldersheim, H., Illner, M., Offerdal, A., Rose, L., i Swianiewicz, P. (red.). (1996). Local Democracy and the Process of Transformation in East-Central Europe. Boulder: Westview.
  • Beetham, D. (1994). Conditions for Democratic Consolidation. Review of African Political Economy, 21(60), 157–172. DOI: 10.1080/03056249408704053
  • Beetham, D. (1996). Theorizing Democracy and Local Government. W: D. King i G. Stoker (red.), Rethinking Local Democracy (28–49). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Bermeo, N. (2016). On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2016.0012
  • Bokszczanin, I. i Mirska, A. (red.). (2014). Demokracja Lokalna w państwach Europy. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.
  • Boogards, M. (2009). How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization. 16(2), 399–423. DOI: 10.1080/13510340902777800
  • Brzostek, M.G. (2017). Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia – między demokracją a autorytaryzmem. Acta Politica Polonica, 40, 5–20. DOI: 10.18276/ap.2017.40-01
  • Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2002.0003
  • Cassani, A. i Tomini, L. (2018). Reversing regimes and concepts: from democratization to autocratization. European Political Science, 19, 272–287. DOI: 10.1057/s41304-018-0168-5
  • Cassani, A. i Tomini L. (2019). Autocratization in Post-Cold War Political Regimes. Basingtoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Charron, N., Dijkstra, L. i Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union member states. Regional Studies. 48(1), 68-90. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013.770141
  • Collier, D. i Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430–451. DOI: 10.2307/25054009
  • Dahl, R. (2000). On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Diamond, L. (1996). Is the Third Wave Over? Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 20–37. DOI: 10.1353/jod.1996.0047
  • Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy. Towards Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 25–31. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2002.0025
  • Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141-155. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2015.0009
  • Diamond, L., i Morlino, L. (red.). (2005). Assessing the quality of democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Diamond, L., Plattner, M., Chu, Y. i Tien, H. (red.). (1997). Consolidating Third Wave Democracies. Themes and Perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Ekman, J. (2009). Political Participation and Regime Stability: A Framework for Analyzing Hybrid Regimes. International Political Science Review, 30(1), 7–31. DOI: 10.1177/0192512108097054
  • Epstein, D., Bates, R., Goldstone, J., Kristensen, I. i O’Halloran, S. (2006). Democratic Transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 551–569. DOI:10.2307/3694234
  • Falleti, T.G. (2014). A Sequential Theory of Decentralization and Its Effects on the Intergovernmental Balance of Power: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective. (Kellogg Institute) Working Paper. 314.
  • Fink-Hafner, D. i Hafner-Fink, M. (2009). The Determinants of the Success of Transitions to Democracy. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(9), 1603–1625. DOI: 10.1080/09668130903209152
  • Geddes, B., Wright, J. i Frantz, E. (2014). Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 313–331. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592714000851
  • Gilbert, L. i Mohseni, P. (2011). Beyond authoritarianism. The conceptualization of hybrid regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 46, 270–297. DOI: 10.1007/s12116-011-9088-x
  • Goldsmith, M. (1992). Local Government. Urban Studies, 29(3/4), 393–410. DOI:10.1080/00420989220080501
  • Graham, B., Miller, M.K. i Strøm, K.W. (2017). Safeguarding democracy: Power sharing and democratic survival. American Political Science Review, 111(4), 686–704. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055417000326
  • Hay, C. (2002). Political Analysis. A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Heinelt, H. (2015). The Changing Context of Local Democracy. Abingdon, NewYork: Routledge.
  • Heinelt, H., Magnier, A., Cabria, M. i Reynaert, H. (red.). (2018). Political Leaders and Changing Local Democracy. Basinsgtoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hendriks, F., Lindström, A. i Loughlin, J. (2010). Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hesse, J.J. i Sharpe, L.J. (1991). Local government in international perspective: some comparative observations. W: J.J.,Hesse (red.), Local government and urban affairs in international perspective (603–621). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
  • Hooghe, L. i in. (2016). Measuring regional authority. Volume I: a postfunctionalist theory of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Huntington, S. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Karl, T.L. (1990). Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 23(1), 1–21. DOI: 10.2307/422302
  • King, D. i Stoker, G. (red.). (1996). Rethinking Local Democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Kohler-Koch, B. i Larat, F. (2009). European Multilevel Governance. Contrasting Images in National Research. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Kowalewski, M. (2019). Niejednoznaczna odpowiedź miast na populizm i kryzys demokracji. Studia Socjologiczne. 234(3), 55–80. DOI: 10.24425/sts.2019.126154
  • Kriesi, H. i Silke, A. (2007). The Network Approach. W: P.A. Sabatier (red.), Theories of the Policy Process (129–154). Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Levine, D.H. i Molina, J.E., (red.). (2011). The Quality of Democracy in Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Levitsky, S. i Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lijphart, A. (1991). Constitutional Choices for New Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 2(1), 72–84. DOI: 10.1353/jod.1991.0011
  • Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Linz, J. i Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johnsv Hopkins University Press.
  • Linz, J. i Stepan, A. (1997). Toward Consolidated Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 14–33. DOI: 10.1353/jod.1996.0031
  • Lipset, S.M. (1994). The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited: 1993 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 59(1), 1–22. DOI: 10.2307/2096130
  • Loughlin, J. i in. (1999). Regional and Local Democracy in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Loughlin, J. i in. (2001). Subnational Democracy in the European Union: Challenges and Opportunities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lührmann, A. i Lindbergh, S.I. (2018). Keeping the Democratic Façade: Contemporary Autocratization as a Game of Deception. V-Dem Working Paper. 75.
  • Lührmann, A. i in. (2018). State of the world 2017: autocratization and exclusion? Democratization, 25(8), 1321–1340. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2018.1479693
  • Marks, G., Hooghe, L. i Blanc, K. (1996). European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 343–378. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00577.x
  • Marks, G. i Hooghe, L. (2001). Multilevel Governance and European Integration. Oxford: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers.
  • Matyjak, S. (2018). Mechanizmy prawne demokracji lokalnej w systemie samorządu gminnego. Praca doktorska.
  • Mazur, S. (red.). (2015). Współzarządzanie publiczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Mbate, M. (2017). Decentralisation, Governance and Accountability: Theory and Evidence. Journal of African Democracy and Development, 1(2), 1–16. URL: www.kas.de/Uganda/en/
  • McFaul, M. (2002). The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship. Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World. World Politics, 54(2), 212-244. DOI:10.2307/25054183
  • Mechkova, V., Lührmann, A. i Lindbergh, S. I. (2017). How much democratic backsliding? Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 162–169. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2017.0075
  • Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and Defective Democracies. Democratization, 11(5), 33–58. DOI: 10.1080/13510340412331304598
  • Montero, A.P. i Samuels, D.J. (red.) (2004). Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America. University of Notre Dame: Notre Dame.
  • Morlino, L. (2008). Are there hybrid regimes? Or are they just an optical illusion?, European Political Science Review, 1(2), 273–296. DOI: 10.1017/S1755773909000198
  • Morlino, L. (2011). Changes for Democracy. Actors, Structures, Processes, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Møller, J. i Skaaning, S.E. (2011). Stateness first? Democratization, 18(1), 1–26. DOI:10.1080/13510347.2011.532607
  • Newman, I. (2014). Reclaiming local democracy. A progressive future of the local government. Bristol, Chicago: Polity Press.
  • Nowotarski, B. (2018). Fałszywa (fake) demokracja: próba modelowego ujęcia. Studia Socjologiczno-Polityczne. Seria Nowa. 9(2), 43-61. DOI: 10.26343/0585556X20802
  • O’Donnell, G. (1993). On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems. A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries. World Development, 21(8), 1355-1369. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(93)90048-E
  • O’Donnell, G. (1996). Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55–69. DOI:10.1353/jod.1994.0010
  • O’Donnell, G., Vargas Cullel, J., Iazzetta, O.M. (2004). The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications. University of Notre Dame Press: South Bend.
  • Ottaway, M. (2003). Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Page, E.C. i Goldsmith, M. (red.). (1987). Central-local government relations: a comparative analysis of West European unitary states. London: Sage.
  • Piattoni, S. (2010). The Theory of Multi-level Governance: Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Plattner, M. (2015). Is democracy in decline? Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 5-10. DOI:10.1353/jod.2015.0014
  • Pratchett, L. i Wilson, D. (1996). Local Democracy and Local Government. Basingstoke, London: Macmillan Press.
  • Radzik-Maruszak, K. (2019). Rada gminy jako uczestnik lokalnego współrządzenia. Przykład Anglii, Finlandii, Polski i Słowenii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Regulski, J. (1999). Building Local Democracy in Poland. Budapest: Open Society Institute.
  • Rustow, D. (1970). Transitions to Democracy. Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics 2(3), 337–363. DOI: 10.2307/421307
  • Saikkonen, I. A-L. (2016). Variation in subnational electoral authoritarianism: evidence from the Russian Federation. Democratization, 23(3), 437–458. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2014.975693
  • Saito, F. (2001). Decentralization Theories Revisited: Lessons from Uganda. Ryukoku RISS Bulletin. 31.
  • Schedler, A. (2013). The politics of uncertainty: sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmidt, M. (2000). Demokratietheorien. Eine Einführung. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
  • Schneider, C. i Schmitter, P.C. (2004). Liberalization, Transition and Consolidation: Measuring the Components of Democratization. Democratization, 11(5), 1–32. DOI: 10.1080/13510340412000287271
  • Share, D. (1987). Transitions to Democracy and Transition Through Transaction. Comparative Political Studies, 19(4), 525–548. DOI: 10.1177/0010414087019004004
  • Soos, G., Toka, G., i Wright, G. (red.). (2002). The State of Local Democracy in Central Europe. Budapest: Open Society Institute.
  • Stoker, G. (1996). Introduction: Normative Theories of Local Government and Democracy. D. King i G. Stoker (red.), Rethinking Local Democracy (1–27). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Swianiewicz, P. (2002). Modele samorządu terytorialnego w krajach Europy Zachodniej oraz Środkowej – próba generalizacji. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 4, 49–57. studreg.uw.edu.pl/dane/web_sril_files/74/2002_4_swianiewicz.pdf
  • Swianiewicz, P. (2014). An Empirical Typology of Local Government Systems in Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies, 40(2): 292–311. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2013.807807
  • Szymański, A. (2017). De-Europeanisation and De-Democratisation in the EU and Its Neighbourhood. Yearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe, 15(2), 187–211.
  • Szymański, A. (2019). De-Democratization: The Case of Hungary in Comparative Perspective. PS: Political Science and Politics, 52(2), 272–273. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096518002275
  • Święcicki, Ł. (2019). Samorząd terytorialny w czasach kryzysu demokracji liberalnej. W: J. Gmitruk i T. Skoczek (red.), Samorząd – kultura – Europa (57–70). Warszawa: Muzeum Niepodległości w Warszawie, Ludowe Towarzystwo Naukowo-Kulturalne.
  • Tomini, L. i. Sandri, G. (red.). (2018). Challenges of Democracy in the 21st Century: Concepts, Methods, Causality and the Quality of Democracy. London: Routledge.
  • Van der Waldt, G. (2010). Core Theories for the Teaching of Local Democracy. Administratio Publica, 18(1), 12–29. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2233.7767
  • Vanhanen, T. (1992). Strategies of democratization. London: Taylor&Francis.
  • Wojnicki, J. (red.). (2014). Europejskie modele samorządu terytorialnego. Stan obecny i perspektywy. Warszawa: ASPRA-JR.
  • Wojtaszczyk, K.A., Stawarz, P. i Wiśniewska-Grzelak, J. (red.). (2018). Zmierzch demokracji liberalnej? Warszawa: ASPRA-JR.
  • Zakaria, F. (1996). The rise The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs 76(6), 22–44. DOI: 10.2307/20048274
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-c46dd061-4f88-45bf-a548-f4e89264de98
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.