2019 | vol. 63, nr 9 | 103-116
Article title

Meeting the Europe 2020 Strategy sustainable development guidelines by Poland

Title variants
Wykonanie wytycznych strategii ,,Europa 2020” w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju w Polsce
Languages of publication
Many documents produced by the EU, including the Europe 2020 Strategy, advocate the assumption that the European Union member states will strive to achieve sustainable development, which therefore needs to be measured with comparable parameters. The research objective was to evaluate sustainable growth indicators in Poland against the background of the same indicators in the European Union, and to ‘estimate’ chances to achieve the objectives set in the Europe 2020 Strategy. Two hypotheses were put forward in the study: a large number of indicators analysed by the Main Statistical Office in Poland allows forecasting the achievement of Poland’s objectives adopted in the Strategy; the most difficult to achieve will be the goal of financing research and development. In Poland, not all the changes were beneficial. The EU as a whole has the chance to approximate to the set value of the indicators. Both hypotheses were verified.
Wiele dokumentów opracowanych przez UE, w tym strategia „Europa 2020”, opowiada się za założeniem, że państwa członkowskie Unii Europejskiej będą dążyć do osiągnięcia zrównoważonego rozwoju, który w związku z tym należy mierzyć za pomocą porównywalnych parametrów. Celem badań była ocena wskaźników zrównoważonego wzrostu w Polsce na tle tych samych wskaźników w Unii Europejskiej oraz „oszacowanie” szans na osiągnięcie celów określonych w strategii „Europa 2020”. W badaniu wysunięto dwie hipotezy: duża liczba wskaźników analizowanych przez Główny Urząd Statystyczny w Polsce (GUS) pozwala prognozować realizację celów Polski przyjętych w strategii. Najtrudniejszy do osiągnięcia będzie cel finansowania badań i rozwoju. W Polsce nie wszystkie zmiany były korzystne. UE jako całość ma szansę zbliżyć się do ustalonej wartości wskaźników. Obie hipotezy zostały zweryfikowane.
  • Balas, A., and Molenda, A. (2016). Indicators of Poland’s sustainable development and tools for their dissemination and presentation. Optimum. Economic Studies, 2(80), 97-114.
  • Baležentis, A., Baležentis, T., and Brauers, W. (2011). Implementation of the Strategy Europe 2020 by the multi-objective evaluation method MULTIMOORA. Ekonomie A Management, Section: Economics 2, 6-26. Retrieved from 1212-3609
  • Borychowski, M., Staniszewski, J., and Zagierski, B. (2016). Problems of the measuring of the sustain-
  • able development on the examples of selected indicators, Economic Yearbooks of Kujawy and Pomorze University in Bydgoszcz, 9, 28-43. Retrieved from
  • Borys, T. (2005). Introduction to research on sustainable development indicators. In T. Borys (Ed.), Sustainable development indicators. Economics and environment (pp. 1-19). Warszawa-Białystok: Economics and Environment.
  • Borys, T. (2014). Selected problems of measurement methodology of new development paradigm: Polish experiences. Optimum. Economic Studies, 3(69), 3-21.
  • Burchard-Dziubińska, M. (2001). The concept of sustainable development – the troublesome fruit
  • of political decisions. In: F. Piontek (Ed.) Economics and sustainable development. Theory and education. Economics and environment (pp. 64-72). Białystok.
  • Committee of the Region, The EU’s Assembly of Regional and Local Representatives. (n. d.). Consultation of European Regions and Cities on New Strategy for Sustainable Growth. A new Lisbon Strategy after 2010. Final Report.
  • Commoner, B. (1974). The closing circle. Warszawa: Polish Economic Publishers.
  • Costantini, V., and Martini, C. (2010). The causality between energy consumption and economic growth. A multi-sectoral analysis using non-stationary co-integrated panel data. Energy Economics, 32(3), 591-603.
  • Consultation on the Future EU 2020 Strategy, Commission Working Document, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 24.11.2009, COM(2009)647 final.
  • Delzeit, R., and Holm-Müller, K. (2009). Steps to discern sustainability criteria for a certification
  • scheme of bioethanol in Brazil: approach and difficulties. Energy, 34(5), 662-668.
  • Domorenok, E. (2009). The EU Lisbon agenda and Cohesion policy: challenges for territorial governance; paper presented at the workshop “The Politics of Governance Architectures: Institutions, Power and Public Policy in the EU Lisbon Strategy. ECPR Joint Sessions”. Retrieved April 14-19, 2009 from., Lisbon/Portugal.
  • Europe 2020, The New Lisbon Strategy. (2009). Hague: Social and Economic Council.
  • Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. (n. d.). Brussels: European Commission. 3.3.2010, Com (2010) 2020.
  • Fischer, S., Gran, S., Hacker, B., Jakobi, A. P., Petzold, S., Pusch, T., and Steinberg, P. (2010). Europe 2020 – proposals for the post–Lisbon strategy. Retrieved from
  • Goldschmidt K., Harrison T., Holtry M., and Reeh J. (2013). Sustainable procurement: integrating classroom learning with university sustainability programs. Decision Sci J Innov Educ. 11(3), 279-294.
  • Hoppe, G. (2012). Sustainable Development Needs a New Economic Policy. Internal Trade, Trends and Challenges for Sustainable Development in the 21st Century, no. 1, 36-45. Retrieved from in Polish.
  • Kėdaitienė, A., and Kėdaitis, V. (2009).The Lisbon strategy and economic growth. Ekonomikair vadyba: aktualijos ir perspektyvos 2(15), 94-103.
  • Kryk, B. (2012). Quality of life in the context of sustainable development, Internal Trade, Trends and Challenges for Sustainable Development in the 21st Century, 1, 145-155. Retrieved from
  • Lee C. C., Chang C. P., and Chen P. F. (2008). Energy-income causality in OECD countries revisited: the key role of capital stock. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2359-2373.
  • Radulova, E. (2009). The construction of the childcare policy discourse in the EU through the Open Method of Coordination (Paper presented at the workshop “The Politics of Governance Architectures: Institutions, Power and Public Policy in the EU Lisbon Strategy”. ECPR Joint Sessions, 14-19 April 2009). Lisbon/Portugal.
  • Rogala, P. (2005). Indicator module in local sustainability audit. In: T. Borys (Ed.), Sustainable development indicators (209-237). Economics and Environment, Warszawa-Białystok.
  • Rzeńca, A. (2015). Partnership for the sake of the sustainable development in the new programming period – opportunities and threats. Regional Barometer. Analyses and Forecasts, 13(4), 21-27.
  • Sahely H., Kennedy C., and. Adams B. (2005). Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems. Canadian J Civil Eng., 32(1), 72-85.
  • Sánchez, R. S. (2009). The Europeanization effects of the Lisbon Strategy: The contribution of EU funding programmes (Paper presented at the workshop “The Politics of Governance Architectures: Institutions, Power and Public Policy in the EU Lisbon Strategy”. ECPR Joint Sessions, 14-19 April 2009). Lisbon/Portugal.
  • Stern D. I., and Cleveland C. J. (2004). Energy and economic growth. Encyclopedia of Energy, (2), 35-51. Retrieved from
  • Steurer, R. I., and Martinuzzi, A. (Eds.). (2007). Sustainable development strategies in Europe: Taking stock 20 years after the Brundtland report. European Environment. Special Issue, 17(3), 147-214.
  • Steurer, R., Berger, G., and Hametner, M. (2010). The vertical integration of Lisbon and sustainable development strategies across the EU: How different governance architectures shape the European coherence of policy documents. Natural Resources Forum, 34(1), 71-84.
  • Steurer, R., and Berger, G. (2010). The Lisbon Strategy and sustainable development strategies across Europe: How different governance arrangements shape the European coherence of policy documents. Universität für Bodenkultur Wien Department für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschafte. Retrieved from
  • Welzer, H., Wiegandt, K. (2001). Perspektiven einer nachhaltiger Entwicklung. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
  • Żmuda, M. (2011). Europe 2020 Strategy as a plan of socio-economic growth of the European Union. Scientific Works of the University of Economics in Wrocław. Economics, (211), 200-210.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.