Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2019 | 27 | 39-51

Article title

The Institute of Representation in the Civil Process of Russia: Trends and Development Prospects

Title variants

Languages of publication



Art. 48 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation guarantees everyone the right to qualified legal assistance. The question of the means and methods it should be provided with has been debated between lawyers for a long time. A number of scientists talk about the need for legislative consolidation of the ‘advocate monopoly’. Others consider it appropriate to license the legal services market. These disputes remain relevant today. However, in 2019, Russia has undergone a reform of procedural law, which lawyers have called a ‘process revolution.’ Many rules of procedural codes have undergone major changes. In particular, as a result of the reform, the requirements for persons who may act as representatives in civil matters have been substantially changed. In the framework of this article, an attempt is made to analyse the reform of the institution of representation. Based on a systematic analysis of procedural legislation and law enforcement practice, the author comes to the conclusion that legislative consolidation of the need for higher legal education for representatives can be called one of the positive aspects of the reform. This article provides an analysis of the development trends of the institution of representation in the historical aspect. The author concludes that it is maintaining logical and consistent movement along the path of becoming an‘advocate monopoly’ in Russia. It seems that subject to its competent and phased introduction, as well as the reform of the corps of the bar itself, not only by increasing its number but above all by increasing the professionalism of its members, it can and should become an effective tool in the civil process.






Physical description


  • Urals State Law University


  • Kudryavceva V.P., Status poverennogo v grazhdanskom i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve, [Kudryavtseva V.P., Attorney status in civil and administrative proceedings] “Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process” 2017, No. 12.
  • Razd’yakonov E.S., Tarasov I.N., Halatov S.A., Aktual’nye voprosy vozmeshcheniya sudebnyh izderzhek: kommentarij k Postanovleniyu Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF, [Razdyakonov E.S., Tarasov I.N., Khalatov S.A., Actual issues of reimbursement of legal costs: commentary on the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation] “Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossijskoj Federacii” 2016, No. 4.
  • Tarlo E.G., Problemy professional’nogo predstavitel’stva v sudoproizvodstve Rossii [Problems of professional representation in the legal proceedings of Russia], avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk M., 2004.
  • Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 15.04.2014 No. 312 ‘Ob utverzhdenii gosudarstvennoj programmy Rossijskoj Federacii “Yusticiya”’ [Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 15 April 2014, No. 312 ‘On approval of the state programme of the Russian Federation “Justice”’].
  • Proekt Rasporyazheniya Pravitel’stva RF ‘Koncepciya regulirovaniya rynka professional’noj yuridicheskoj pomoshchi’, podgotovlen Minyustom Rossii [The draft Government Order of the Russian Federation ‘The Concept of Regulation of the Professional Legal Aid Market’, prepared by the Ministry of Justice of Russia].
  • Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 23.01.2007, No. 1-P ‘Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozhenij punkta 1 stat’i 779 i punkta 1 stat’i 781 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii v svyazi s zhalobami obshchestva s ogranichennoj otvetstvennost’yu ‘Agentstvo korporativnoj bezopasnosti’ i grazhdanina V.V. Makeeva’ [Decree of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 23 January 2007, No. 1-P ‘On the case on the verification of the constitutionality of the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 779 and paragraph 1 of Article 781 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with complaints of the limited liability company’ Corporate Security Agency ‘and V.V. Makeev].
  • Informacionnoe pis’mo Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 29 sentyabrya 1999 g., No. 48 ‘O nekotoryh voprosah sudebnoj praktiki, voznikayushchih pri rassmotrenii sporov, svyazannyh s dogovorami na okazanie pravovyh uslug’. [Information Letter No. 48 of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated 29 September 1999 ‘On Certain Issues of Judicial Practice Arising in the Consideration of Disputes Relating to Legal Services Agreements’].

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.