Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2020 | 20 | 3 | 96-123

Article title




Title variants

Languages of publication



Disruptive technologies have seen how students interact with their teachers, how we as teachers now prepare and provide learning, and how we might best incorporate artificial intelligence into the classroom. To this end, the pedagogical affordances offered by the voice-user interface of digital assistants is explored. Instructional strategies supported by examples are then provided, along with means for actioning their use in the classroom and evaluating their appropriateness and viability for enhancing language learning.








Physical description


  • Woosong University


  • Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., & Ghazisaedy, M. (2015). The impact of social robotics on L2 learners’ anxiety and attitude in English vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 523-535.
  • Baier, D., Rese, A., & Roglinger, M. (2018). Conversational user interfaces for online shops? A categorization of use cases. ICIS 2018 – International Conference on Information Systems. San Francisco, December 13-16.
  • Bii, P., Too, J., & Mukwa, C. (2018). Teacher attitude towards use of chatbots in routine teaching. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(7), 1586-1597. https://doi.org/19.10.13189/ujer.2018.060719
  • Brown, D. (2014). Principles of English Language Teaching, 6th Ed. Englewood Cliffs: Pearson Education.
  • Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
  • Chapelle, C. (2005). Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research. In J. L. Egbert & G. N. Petrie (Eds.), CALL Research Perspectives (pp. 53-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Coniam, D. (2014). The linguistic accuracy of chatbots: usability from an ESL perspective. Text & Talk, 34(5), 545-567, https://doi.org/10.11515/text-2014-0018
  • Dizon, G. (2017). Using intelligent personal assistants for second language learning: A case study of Alexa. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 811-830.
  • Dornyei, Z. (2018). Safe speaking environments – What? Why? How? 52nd IATEFL (International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language) Conference. April 10-13, Brighton, United Kingdom.
  • Enge, E. (2018). Rating the smarts of the digital personal assistants in 2018. Stone Temple: Study Series. Retrieved from https://www.stonetemple.com/digital-personal-assistants-study/#which_smartest
  • Facebook Business. (2018). Channel 4: Humans. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/business/success/channel-4-humans
  • Fotos, S., & Brown, C. (2004). New Perspectives on CALL for Second and Foreign Language Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fryer, L. (2006). Bots for language learning. The Language Teacher, 30(8), 33-34.
  • Fryer, L. & Carpenter, R. (2006). Bots as language learning tools. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8-14, https://dx.doi.org/10125/44068
  • Fryer, L., & Nakao, K. (2009). Assessing chatbots for EFL learneruse. In A. Stoke (Ed.), JALT2008 Conference Proceedings (pp. 849-857). Tokyo, Japan: JALT.
  • Fryer, L., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of chatbot and human task partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 461-468, https://doi.org.10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045
  • Fryer, L., Nakao, K., & Thompson, A. (2019). Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 279-289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.023
  • Hsu, W. (2015). Transitioning to a communication-orientated pedagogy: Taiwanese university freshmen’s view on class participation. System, 49, 61-72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.12.002
  • Jia, J., & Chen, W. (2008). Motivate the learners to practice English through playing with chatbot. CSIEC Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment (pp. 180-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • John, P., & Wheeler, S. (2013). The Digital Classroom: Harnessing Technology for the Future of Learning and Teaching. New York: David Fulton Publishers.
  • Jones, R., & Hafner, C. (2012). Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction. New York: Routledge.
  • Kim, N. (2017). Effects of different types of chatbots on EFL learners’ speaking competence and learner perception. 비교문화연구 (Cross-Cultural Studies), 48, 223-252.
  • Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). Evaluation. In M. Levy & G. Stockwell (Eds.), CALL Dimensions: Options and Issues in Computer-Assisted Language Learning (pp. 40-83). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Moussalli, S., & Cardoso, W. (2016). Are commercial ‘personal robots’ ready for language learning? Focus on second language speech. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley & S. Thouesny (Eds), CALL Communities and Culture – Short Papers from EuroCALL 2016 (pp. 325-329), https://doi.org/10.14705/rpent.2016.eurocall2016.583
  • Moussalli, S., & Cardoso, W. (2017). Can you understand me? Speaking robots and accented speech. In K. Borthwick, L. Bradley & S. Thouesny (eds.), CALL in a Climate of Change: Adapting to Turbulent Global Conditions – Short Papers from EuroCALL 2017 (pp. 217-221), https://doi.org/10.14705/rpent.2017.eurocall2017.716
  • Nordrum, A. (2017, January 04). CES 2017: the year of voice recognition. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/consumer-electronics/gadgets/ces-2017-the-year-of-voice-recognition
  • Richards, J. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC, 46(1), 5-22, https://doi.org/10/1177/00336882145621
  • Shawar, B. (2017). Integrating CALL systems with chatbots as conversational partners. Computación y Sistemas, 21(4), 615-626, https://doi.org/10.13053/CyS-21-4-2868
  • Shawar, B., & Atwell, E. (2015). ALICE Chatbot: Trials and Outputs. Computación y Sistemas, 19(4), 625-632, https://doi.org/10.13053/CyS-19-4-2326
  • Sony Pictures Television. (December 14, 2010). IBM’s Watsons computing system to challenge all time Henry Lambert Jeopardy! Champions. Retrieved from http://www.jeopardy.com/news/watson1x7ap4.php
  • UK Safer Internet Center. (2018). 7 in 10 children are using voice assisted technology finds new research from UKSIC partner childnet. Retrieved from https://www.saferinternet.org.uk/blog/7-10-children-are-using-voice-assisted-technology-finds-new-research-uksic-partner-childnet
  • Underwood, J. (2017). Exploring AI language assistants with primary EFL students. In K. Borthwick, L. Bradley & S. Thouesny (Eds.), CALL in a Climate of Change: Adapting to Turbulent Global Conditions – Short Papers from EUROCALL 2017 (pp. 317-321).
  • Underwood, J. (2018). Using voice and AI assistants for language learning. British Council Teaching English Webinar. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/using-voice-ai-assistants-language-learning
  • Varol, O., Ferrara, E., David, C., Menczer, F., and Flammini, A. (2017). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. The 11th AAAI (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence) International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM-17). May 15-18, Montreal, Canada.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Tool and symbol in child development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIA – a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36-45.
  • Winkler, R., & Sollner, M. (2018). Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state-of-the-art analysis. In: Academy of Management Annual Meeting (AOM). Chicago, USA.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.