PL EN


2019 | 7 | 1 | 85-107
Article title

They appear missing – An examination of the apparition of language, discourse and agency in a Finnish landscape of education

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
Abstracts
EN
This article examines the visual apparition of language, discourse and agency in a school unit in Southwest Finland. It addresses the disciplinary functions of schools as landscapes and the discourses materialized in them. The purpose of this article is to render visible the discourses, the systematic practices that form the objects of which we speak that are manifested in the landscape. The results indicate high levels of linguistic homogeneity, marked by high use of Finnish and English text. This is in clear contrast with a linguistically heterogeneous study body, marked by the apparent, albeit marginal visual presence of other languages not taught in the school as parts of its curricula. It is evident that the official discourses of language and education are manifested in the landscape. These materialized discourses function to instill desired national and linguistic identities and proprieties on students while landscape operates to effectuate indifference towards these processes. This is further apparent in the behavior of the students who are passive in comparison to the teachers and the school staff and typically express themselves textually either in Finnish or English. The students are not explicitly prohibited from freely expressing themselves, yet their participation in the landscape decreases and homogenizes as they progress through the school system.
Year
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
85-107
Physical description
Document type
Original Article
Dates
published
2019-06-30
Contributors
author
  • University of Turku, Turku, Finland
References
  • Basic Education Act (628/1998).
  • Benjamin, W. (1999). The Arcades Project. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). “Public Opinion Does Not Exist”. In: Bourdieu, P. ed 1996. Sociology in Question. London: Sage. Pp. 149-157.
  • Brown, K. D. (2018). “Shifts and stability in schoolscapes: Diachronic considerations of southeastern Estonian schools”. Linguistics and Education, 44, 12-19.
  • Comprehensive School Act (476/1983).
  • Constitution of Finland (731/1999).
  • Cosgrove, D. E. (1985). “Prospect, Perspective and the Evolution of the Landscape Idea”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 10(1), 45-62.
  • Cresswell, T. (2003). “Landscape and the Obliteration of Practice”. In: Anderson, K, Domosh, M., Pile, S. and
  • Thrift, N. eds 2003. Handbook of Cultural Geography. London: Sage. Pp. 269-282.
  • Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1990). The Logic of Sense. London: Athlone Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (2002). “Preface to the English edition”. In: Deleuze, G. and Parnet, C. eds 2002. Dialogues II. New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. vii-x.
  • Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Derrida, J. (1987). The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  • Duncan, J. S. (1978a). “Men Without Property: The Tramp’s Classification and Use of Urban space”. Antipode, 10(1), 24-34.
  • Duncan, J. S. (1978b). “The Social Construction of Unreality: An Interactionist Approach to the Tourist’s Cognition of Environment”. In: Ley, D. and Samuels, M. eds 1978. Humanistic Geography. Chicago: Maaroufa Press. Pp. 269-282.
  • Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity (2009). Ethical principles of research in the humanities and socia and behavioural sciences and proposals for ethical review. Helsinki: Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity.
  • FNBE (2003). Lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2003. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
  • FNBE (2004). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2004. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
  • Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  • From, T. and Sahlström, F. (2017). “Shared places, separate spaces: constructing cultural spaces through two national languages in Finland”. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 61(4), 465-478.
  • General Upper Secondary Schools Act (629/1998).
  • Goss, J. (1999). “Once-Upon-a-Time in the Commodity World: An Unofficial Guide to the Mall of America”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(1), 45-75.
  • Government Decree (986/1998).
  • Government Decree (1435/2001).
  • Government Decree (955/2002).
  • Greider, T. and Garkovich, L. (1994). “Landscapes: The Social Construction of Nature and the Environment”. Rural Sociology, 59(1), 1-24.
  • Hakulinen, A., Kalliokoski, J., Kankaanpää, S., Kanner, A., Koskenniemi, K., Laitinen, L., Maamies, S. and
  • Nuolijärvi, P. (2009). Suomen kielen tulevaisuus: Kielipoliittinen toimintaohjelma. Helsinki: Institute for the Languages of Finland.
  • Klee, P. (1920). “Schöpferische Konfession: Paul Klee”. In: Edschmid, K. ed 1920. Tribüne der Kunst und der Zeit: Eine Schriftensammlung, XIII. Berlin: Erich Reiß Verlag. Pp. 28-41.
  • Kraftl, P. (2015). “Alter-Childhoods: Biopolitics and Childhoods in Alternative Education Spaces”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(1), 219-237.
  • Kress, G. R. and van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.
  • Kumpulainen, T. (2014). Koulutuksen tilastollinen vuosikirja 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
  • Laihonen, P. and Tódor E. (2017). “The changing schoolscape in a Szekler village in Romania: signs of diversity in rehungarization”. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(3), 362-379. Language Act (423/2003).
  • Lewis, P. F. (1979). “Axioms for Reading the Landscape: Some Guides to the American Scene”. In: Meinig, D. W. ed 1979. The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 11-32.
  • Massumi, B. (1992). A User's Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Matless, D. (2016). Landscape and Englishness. London: Reaktion Books.
  • Mitchell. W. J. T. (2002a). “Imperial Landscape”. In: Mitchell, W. J. T. ed 2002. Landscape and Power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Pp. 5-34.
  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (2002b). “Preface to the Second Edition of Landscape and Power: Space Place and Landscape”. In: Mitchell, W. J. T. ed 2002. Landscape and Power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Pp. viixiv.
  • Pakarinen, S. and Björklund S. (2018). “Multiple language signage in linguistic landscapes and students’ language practices: A case study from a language immersion setting”. Linguistics and Education, 44, 4-11. Personal Data Act (523/1999).
  • Ronai, M. (1976). “Paysages”. Hérodote, 1, 125-159.
  • Ronai, M. (1977). “Paysages: II”. Hérodote, 7, 71-91.
  • Rose, M. (2006). “Gathering ‘Dreams of Presence’: A Project for the Cultural Landscape”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(4), 537-554.
  • Samuels, M. S. (1979). “The Biography of Landscape: Cause and Culpability”. In: Meinig, D. W. 1979 ed. The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 51- 88.
  • Schein, R. H. (1997). “The Place of Landscape: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting an American Scene”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(4), 660-680.
  • Schein, R. H. (2003). “Normative Dimensions of Landscape”. In: Wilson, C. and Groth, P. eds 2003. Everyday America: Cultural Landscape Studies After J.B. Jackson. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 199- 219.
  • Schein, R. H. (2006). “Race and Landscape in the United States”. In: Schein, R. H. ed 2003. Landscape and Race in the United States. New York: Routledge. Pp. 1-21.
  • Scollon, R. (2008). “Discourse itineraries: nine processes of resemiotization”. In: Bhatia, V. K., Flowerdew, J. and
  • Jones, R. H. eds 2008. Advances in Discourse Studies. London: Routledge. Pp. 233-234.
  • Scollon, R. and Wong Scollon, S. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.
  • Spolsky, B. and Cooper, R. L. (1991). The Languages of Jerusalem. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Statistics Finland (2016a). “Population structure, 2015: Appendix table 2. Population according to language 1980-
  • 2015”. http://www.stat.fi/til/vaerak/2015/vaerak_2015_2016-04-01_tau_002_en.html
  • Statistics Finland (2016b). “Population 31.12. by region, language, age, sex and year.” pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__vrm__vaerak/statfin_vaerak_pxt_010.p x/table/tableViewLayout1/?rxid=55772f50-70da-4f66-b5af-5c768ed5df77
  • Szabó, T. P. (2018). “Reflections on the Schoolscape: Teachers on Linguistic Diversity in Hungary and Finland”. In: Palander, M., Riionheimo, H. and Koivisto, V. eds 2018. On the Border of Language and Dialect. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. Pp. 156-190.
  • Tallroth, P. (2012). Strategy for the National Languages of Finland. Helsinki: Prime Minister’s Office Publications.
  • Tuan, Y. (1979). “Thought and Landscape: The Eye and the Mind's Eye”. In: Meinig, D. W. ed 1979. The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 89- 102.
  • Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.
  • Årman, H. (2018). “Speaking ‘the other’?: Youths’ regimentation and policing of contemporary urban vernacular”. Language & Communication 58, 47-61.
Notes
EN
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-c6db8135-f68c-4c20-9c33-01624150d8ed
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.