2016 | 2 (10) | 77-88
Article title

Znaczenie wiedzy akademickiej dla wynalazczości przedsiębiorstw w Polsce

Title variants
The importance of academic knowledge for the inventiveness of enterprises in Poland
Languages of publication
Since knowledge was recognized as a key for innovativeness and consequently for the growth of countries and regions, policies of particular countries have emphasized stimulation of processes of knowledge generation and diffusion. Universities, in particular, have been recognized as a significant source of valuable knowledge whereas cooperation between science and industry as a key for the inventiveness of enterprises. The aim of this paper is to determine to what extent innovations generated by enterprises patenting in Poland base on academic knowledge and whether enterprises which make greater use of stocks of academic knowledge when creating their inventions are also more innovative (i.e. they can boast a greater number of patents). The co-called patent-citation method has been used to determine the extent to which the inventiveness of enterprises is based on knowledge originating from the area of science and it consists in an analysis of patent documents for the location of sources of knowledge that these enterprises cite. More precisely, knowledge sources have been investigated which inventors from enterprises patenting in Poland referred to in their patent descriptions, with the focus on whether the cited knowledge belonged to the stock of university knowledge. An analysis of 389 patent applications of 20 enterprises patenting in Poland in 2005-2011 for the origin of knowledge that was used by these enterprises to make an invention allowed for the formulation of several basic conclusions. Firstly, out of the total stock of knowledge that was used by enterprises while making their own inventions, only 15.03% were stocks of academic knowledge, with the inventiveness of enterprises based to a larger extent on Polish than foreign knowledge stocks of science. Secondly, the extent to which the inventiveness of enterprises was based on knowledge coming from public laboratories of scientific units was rather differentiated over the course of the period covered by the analysis, without showing neither upward nor downward trend. And lastly, the innovativeness of enterprises as measured by the number of obtained patents did not depend on neither whether or to what extent enterprises made use of scientific achievements during the creation of inventions. It is so because on the one hand the inventiveness of only few of the most innovative enterprises included in the analysis was based on knowledge originating from the area of science to a larger extent than usually. On the other hand, the use of only academic knowledge in the process of generation of inventions does not have to translate into success in the form of a large number of patents.
Physical description
  • Adams J.D., Clemmons J.R., Stephan P.E., 2006, How Rapidly Does Science Leak Out?, NBER Working Paper Series, no. 11997.
  • Agrawal A., Henderson R., 2002, Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT, Management Science, vol. 48, no. 1, s. 44-60.
  • Alcacer J., Gittelman M., 2006, Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: the influence of examiner citations, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 88, no. 4, s. 774-779.
  • Alcacer J., Gittelman M., Sampat B.N., 2009, Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: an overview and analysis, Research Policy, vol. 38, s. 415-427.
  • Azoulay P., Graff Zivin J.S., Sampat B.N., 2011, The diffusion of scientific knowledge across time and space: evidence from professional transitions for the superstars of medicine, NBER Working Paper Series, no 16683.
  • Bacchiocchi E., Montobbio F., 2009, Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. a comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations, Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 34, no. 2, s. 169-181.
  • Branstetter L., Ogura Y., 2005, Is Academic Science Driving a Surge in Industrial Innovation? Evidence from Patent Citations, NBER Working Paper Series, no 11561.
  • Collins H.M., 1974, The TEA Set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks, Science Studies, vol. 4, s. 165-186.
  • Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R.,1993, Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, no. 108( 3), 577-598.
  • Kim J., Lee S.J., Marschkle G., 2005, The Influence of University Research on Industrial Innovation, NBER Working Paper Series, no. 11447.
  • Lemley M., Sampat B., 2012, Examiner experience and patent office outcomes, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 94, no. 3, s. 817-827.
  • MacRoberts M.H., MacRoberts B.R., 1986, Quantitative measures of communication in science: a study of the formal level, Social Studies of Science, vol. 16, s. 151-172.
  • MacRoberts M.H., MacRoberts B.R., 1996, Problems of citation analysis, Scientometrics, vol. 36, no. 3, s. 435-444.
  • Mowery D.C., Ziedonis A.A., 2001, The Geographic Reach of Market and Non-Market Channels of Technology Transfer: Comparing Citations and Licenses of University Patents, NBER Working Paper Series, no. 8568.
  • PAN, 2011, Firmy patentujące w Polsce w 2010 r. i w latach 2005-2009, Warszawa.
  • Roach M., Cohen W.M., 2012, Lens or Prism? Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows from Public Research, NBER Working Paper Series, no 182292.
  • Sampat B.N., 2005, Determinants of Patent Quality: An Empirical Analysis, Working Paper.
  • Wachowska M., 2014, Mobilność kapitału ludzkiego jako źródło międzynarodowej i wewnątrzkrajowej dyfuzji wiedzy, Ekonomia XXI Wieku, vol. 2, no. 2, s. 80-92
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.