Rola superwizji w profilaktyce krzywdzenia dzieci

• Authors: Kalita Lech , Chrzan-Dętkoś Magdalena

Title variants

EN

ROLE OF SUPERVISION IN CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES

Abstracts

PL

Artykuł stanowi praktyczną ilustrację wspierającej roli superwizji stosowanej w publicznym systemie pomocy w profilaktyce krzywdzenia dzieci. Autorzy przedstawiają przykład kliniczny poprzedzony kilkoma uwagami dotyczącymi ogólnego znaczenia superwizji w obszarze pomocy psychologicznej oraz krótkim przeglądem badań dotyczących superwizji, zwłaszcza w publicznych systemach wspierania dzieci. Według autorów zewnętrzna pozycja superwizora pozwala w refleksyjny sposób przyjrzeć się sytuacji dziecka z kilku perspektyw jednocześnie, co umożliwia zaplanowanie skuteczniejszych i lepiej dopasowanych interwencji służących dziecku i ochronie jego bezpieczeństwa.

EN

This paper is a practical illustration of a supportive role of supervision in child protection public services. Authors present a clinical example supplemented with some remarks about general role of supervision in psychological help and a brief review of selected research on supervision, specifically in public child protection services. Authors claim that the external position of supervisor allows for reflexive, simultaneous consideration of child’s situation from various perspectives, what leads to a more effective and better suited interventions aimed at children well-being and safety.

Keywords

EN

supervision; reflexive functioning; child protection

PL

superwizja; funkcjonowanie refleksyjne; instytucje opiekuńcze

• Publisher: Fundacja Dajemy Dzieciom Siłę
• Journal: Dziecko krzywdzone. Teoria, badania, praktyka
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 18
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 120-138

Contributors

author

Kalita Lech

author

Chrzan-Dętkoś Magdalena

• Zakład Psychologii i Psychopatologii Rozwoju Instytutu Psychologii Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego

References

• Carpenter, J. S. W., Webb, C. M., Bostock, L. (2013). The surprisingly weak evidence base for supervision: findings from a systematic review of research in child welfare practice (2000–2012). Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1843–1853.
• Cooper, A. (2005). Surface and depth in the Victoria Climbie inquiry report. Child & Family Social Work, 10(1), 1–9. Heim, C., Shugart, M., Craighead, W. E., Nemeroff, C. B. (2010). Neurobiological and psychiatric consequences of child abuse and neglect. Developmental Psychobiology, 52, 671–690.
• Hess, A. K. (1980). Psychotherapy supervision: theory, research, and practice. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.
• Hess, A. K. (2008). Psychotherapy supervision: A conceptual review. W: A. K. Hess, K. D. Hess, T. H. Hess (red.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (s. 3–22). New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.
• Hughes, J. M. (2010). The role of supervision in social work: a critical analysis. Critical Social Thinking: Policy and Practice, 2. Pobrane z: https://www.ucc.ie/en/media/ academic/appliedsocialstudies/docs/JeanneHughes.pdf.
• Jelonkiewicz, I. (2018). Co dzieje się w relacji superwizyjnej? Psychoterapia, 4(187), 69–80.
• Kornerup, H. (2009). ’Milieu-therapy’ with Children: Planned Environmental Therapy in Scandinavia. Londyn: Jessica Kingsley.
• Ladany, N., Mori, Y., Mehr, K. E. (2013). Effective and ineffective supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(1), 28–47.
• Łuczyńska, M., Olech, A. (2013). Wprowadzenie do superwizji pracy socjalnej. Warszawa: Centrum Rozwoju Zasobów Ludzkich.
• Mendelsohn, R. (2012). Parallel process and projective identification in psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Review, 99, 297–314.
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: final report – a child-centred system. Londyn: The Stationery Office.
• Newhill, C. E., Wexler, S. (1997). Client violence toward children and youth services social workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 19, 195–212.
• Panksepp, J. (1999). Emotions as viewed by psychoanalysis and neuroscience: an exercise in consilience, and accompanying commetaries. NeuroPsychoanalysis, 1, 15–89.
• Rustin, M. (2005). Conceptual analysis of critical moments in Victoria Climbié’s life. Child and Family Social Work, 10(1), 11–19.
• Sedlak, A. J., Mettenburg, J., Basena, M., Petta, I., Mcpherson, K., Green, A., Li, S. (2010). Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-4): Report to Congress. Waszyngton, DC: Executive Summary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.
• Sethi, D., Yon, Y., Parekh, N., Anderson, T., Huber, J., Rakovac, I., Meinck, F. (2018). European status report on preventing child maltreatment. Kopenhaga: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Pobrane z: http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/ abstracts/european-status-report-on-preventing-child-maltreatment-2018.
• Shin, J. (2011). Client violence and its negative impacts on work attitudes of child protection workers compared to community service workers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 3338–3360.
• Stanley, J., Goddard, C. (2002). In the firing line: violence and power in child protection work. Chichester – Nowy Jork, NY: Wiley.
• Target, M., Fonagy, P. (1996). Playing with reality: II. The development of psychic reality from a theoretical perspective. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 459–479.
• Watkins, C. E. (1998). Psychotherapy supervision in the 21st century: some pressing needs and impressing possibilities. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7(2), 93–10.
• Watkins, C. E. (2011). Does psychotherapy supervision contribute to patient outcomes? Considering thirty years of research. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(2), 235–256.
• Wheeler, S., Richards, K. (2007). The impact of clinical supervision on counsellors and therapists, their practice and their clients. A systematic review of the literature. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7(1), 54–65. DOI: 10.1080/14733140601185274.
• World Health Organization. (2010). Child Maltreatment (Fact Sheet No. 150). Pobrane z: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs150/en/index.html.