2016 | 2(6) | 113-125
Article title

Does it pay to be good? An analysis of vice and virtue stock performance in the Eurozone

Title variants
Languages of publication
This paper provides a performance analysis of vice and virtue stocks in the Eurozone for the period between January 2005 and December 2014. In order to do so, a vice index consisting of listed Eurozone companies operating in selected vice industries is created and subsequently matched with a corresponding virtue index, which for the purpose of this analysis is represented by the DJSI Eurozone. The tools used to conduct the performance evaluation are the Sharpe ratio, the capital asset pricing model and the Carhart four-factor model. The analysis indicates no consistent outperformance or underperformance of one or the other index, yet the realised performance over the whole period favours the vice index. Consequently, it can be concluded that from a statistical point of view, there is no substantial advantage or disadvantage in being “good” when investing into stocks, as such it is a matter of investor preference, with the note that historical returns do favour vice stocks.
Physical description
  • University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management
  • Yousri Ahmad, A.-R. (2015). Riba, Its Economic Rationale and Implications. Retrieved from
  • Becker, G. S. (1957). The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bernoulli, Daniel (1968). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Gregg, Farnborough
  • Bernstein, W. J. (2001). Rolling Your Own: Three-Factor Analysis. Retrieved from
  • Carhart, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
  • FRED. (2015, August 11). Long-Term Government Bond Yields: 10-year: Main (Including Benchmark) for Germany©. Retrieved August 11, 2015, from
  • French, K. R. (2015). Description of Fama & French European Factors and Portfolios. Retrieved August 15, 2015, from
  • Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15–36. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001
  • Jo, H., Saha, T., Sharma, R., & Wright, S. (2010). Socially Responsible Investing vs. Vice Investing. In AABRI (Ed.), Academic and Business Research Institute Conference – Las Vegas 2010.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. doi:10.2307/1914185
  • Lobe, S., & Walkshäusl, C. (2014). Vice versus virtue investing around the world. Review of Managerial Science, 10(2), 303–344. doi:10.1007/s11846-014-0147-3
  • RBC Global Asset Management. (2012). Does Socially Responsible Investing Hurt Investment Returns? Retrieved from
  • Salaber, J. (2007). The determinants of sin stock returns: Evidence on the European market. Retrieved from BIRD,
  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442. doi:10.2307/2977928
  • Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 119–138. doi:10.2307/2351741
  • Sjöström, E. (2011). The performance of socially responsible investment - A review of scholarly studies published 2008-2010 by Emma Sjöström: SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1948169
  • University of Minnesota. (2015). Durbin Watson Test. Retrieved August 30, 2015, from University of Minnesota:
  • Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. United States: Princeton University Press.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.