One More Time about the Heart: Naive Anatomy in the Kazakh Language in Comparison with Russian and English

• Authors: Temirgazina Zifa , Albekova Assiya , Kurmanova Zauresh
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The naive anatomy of the Kazakhs, the nomadic Turkic people, has evolved over millennia and is based on knowledge about the anatomy of animals. Various mental properties, emotions are attributed to the internal organs of a person, which is reflected in the metaphorical and metonymic use of their names and idioms. The article examines the somatism jurek (‘heart’) in the Kazakh naive anatomy which denotes the second most important internal organ, giving way to the primacy of the liver, the most important organ from the point of view of nomads. The carriers of Russian-speaking and English-speaking cultures consider the heart as the most important internal organ. The complex of meaningful features is determined, showing the universality of the conceptualization of jurek/ serdtse/ heart, while a number of descriptors demonstrate the peculiarity of the naive-anatomical views of the Kazakhs.

Keywords

EN

descriptors jurek; serdtse; heart; naive anatomy; somatism; idioms

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego
• Journal: Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 2
• Pages: 459-475

Dates

published

2021-12-31

Contributors

author

Temirgazina Zifa

• Pavlodar State Pedagogical University

author

Albekova Assiya

• S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University

author

Kurmanova Zauresh

• S. Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University

References

• APRESYAN, Y. D. (1995), Obraz cheloveka po dannym yazyka: popytka sistemnogo analiza. In: Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1, 37-67.
• APRESYAN, V. Y./APRESYAN, Y. D. (1993), Metafora v semanticheskom predstavlenii emotsiy. In: Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 3, 27–35.
• BEKTAYEV, K. B. (1999), Ulken kazaksha-oryssha, oryssha-kazaksha sozdik. Аlmaty.
• BUDAYEV, E. P./CHUDINOV, A. P., (2013), Cognitivnaya teoriya metafor: novye gorizonty. In: Tribuna ucheno-go. 6-13.
• DAVITZ, J. R. (1969), The Language of Emotion. NewYork.
• DICTIONARY CAMBRIDGE, (2020). In: https://dictionary.cambridge.org [accessed 25 I 2020].
• ENFIELD, N. J./WIERZBICKA, A. (eds). (2002), The body in description of emotion. Cross-linguistic studies. Spe-cial issue of Pragmatics & Cognition. 10:1/2.
• ETYMOLOGICAL DICTIONARY OF ENGLISH (2019). In: https://www.etymonline.com [accessed 9 XI 2019].
• FASMER, M. (2019), Etymologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka. In: https://classes.ru/all-russian/russian-dictionary-Vasmer-term-11887.htm [accessed 28 XI 2019].
• GADZHIYEVA, A. A. (2017), On teaching phraseology of the Kazakh Language in the Russian-speaking audi-ence. In: RUDN Journal of Language Education and Translingual Practices, 14 (3). 454–459. DOI 10.22363/2312-8011-2017-14-3-454-459
• GOLOVANIVSKAYA, M. K. (1997), Frantsuzskiy mentalitet s tochki zreniya nositelya russkogo yazyka. Moskva.
• GREZSA, B. (2018), What do colour names tell us? The case of Kazakh. In: Acta Orientalia Academiae Scien-tiarum Hung. 71 (2), 231–240. DOI: 10.1556/062.2018.71.2.6
• GUANTSZE, Ch. (2013), Frazeologiya tela v russkom yazyke glazami nositelya kitayskoy lingvokul'tury. Mos-kva.
• KABAKOVA, G. I. (2015), “Naivnaya anatomiya” v zerkale yazyka: pischevaritel'nyy trakt. In: Etnolingvistika. Onomastika. Etimologiya. 133. Ekaterinburg.
• KAZAKSHA-ORYSSHA SOZDIK (2019). In: https://sozdik.kz/ru [accessed 11 XI 2019].
• KENESBAYEV, I. K. (2007), Fraseologiyalyk sozdik. Аlmaty.
• KIKLEWICZ, A. K. (2007), Prityazheniye yazyka. T. I. Semantika. Lingvistika teksta. Kommunikativnaya lingvistika. Olshtyn.
• KIKLEWICZ, A. K. (2015), O kommunikativno-pragmaticheskikh aspektakh mnogoznachnosti. In: Przeglad Wschodnioeuropejski. YI/1, 167–179.
• KOBLANDINA, K. S. (2012), Semanticheskiye osobennosti kontseptov ‘zhan/ soul, jurek/ heart’. In: Filolog-icheskiye nauki. Etno-, sotsio- i psikholingvistika. 9, 87–95.
• KONDRAT'EVA, O. N. (2004), Kontseptsiya vnutrennego mira cheloveka v russkikh letopisyakh (na primere kontseptov dusha, serdtse, um). Ekaterinburg.
• KÖVECSES, Z. (1989), Emotion Concepts. Frankfurt-am-Main: Springer Verlag.
• KOZHAKHMETOVA, Kh. K./ZHAYSAKOVA, R. Y./et al., (1988), Kazaksha-oryssha fraseologiyalyk sozdik. Аlma-Ata.
• MACMILLAN DICTIONARY. In: https://www.macmillandictionary.com [accessed 20 I 2020].
• MUSABEKOVA, U. A./KUL'TURSYNOVA, F. B. (2018), Natcional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika representatsii kontsep-ta „JUREK‟ (na materiale proizvedeniy M. Zholdasbekova). In: Neophilology. 4 (16), 15–19. DOI 10.20310/2587-6953-2018-4-16-15-19.
• NAPOL'NOVA, Ye. (2011), “Serdtse” v russkom i turetskom yazykakh (fragmenty yazykovoy kartiny mira). In: İCANAS, Bildiriler. 3(38), 1163–1171.
• NAURZBAYEVA, Z. (2019), Kazakhskiy toy kak zhertvoprinosheniye totema. In: https://express-k.kz/news/zhizn/kazakhskiy_toy_kak_zhertvoprinoshenie_totema-81645 [accessed 27 XII 2019].
• NIKOLINA, Y. V. (2002), Somatic fraseological units characterizing a person in the T'urkic languages of Siberia and Kazakh. Novosibirsk.
• PODGORNAYA, V. V. (2016), "Naivnaya anatomiya" v angliyskoy yazykovoy kartine mira. Sankt-Peterburg.
• RAKHIMZHANOV, K./AKOSHEVA, M./et al. (2020), Metaforicheskaya i metonimicheskaya interpretatsiya serdtsa v kazakhskom i tuvinskom yazykakh: vzaimodeystviye yazyka, anatomii i kultury. In: Novye issledovaniya Tuvy. 4, 261–271. DOI: www.doi.org/10.25178/nit.2020.4.18
• RUDOVA, Y. V. (2015), Osmysleniye anatomii i fisiologii v naivnoy i nauchnoy kartinakh mira. In: Izvestiya VGPU. Filologicheskiye nauki. 106–110.
• SAGALAYEV, A. M./OKTYABR'SKAYA, I. V. (1990), Traditsionnoye mirovozzreniye t'urkov Yuzhnoy Sibiri. Znak i ritual. Novosibirsk.
• SHAPILOVA, N. I. (2008), Otrazheniye obydennogo soznaniya v avtorskoy kartine mira (na materiale khudozhestvennogo diskursa V. P. Astaf'eva) In: Obydennoye metayazykovoye soznaniye: ontolog-icheskiye i gnoseologicheskiye aspekty. 1, 415–421. Kemerovo–Barnaul.
• SIROTINA, T. A. (2006), Bol'shoy sovremennyy anglo-russkiy, russko-angliyskiy slovar'. Moskva.
• SUKHORUKOVA, Y. S. (2017), K voprosu o naivnoy anatomii serdtsa vo frantsuzskoy frazeologii. In: Filolog-icheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 3(69), 3, 168–170.
• SULTANGUBIYEVA, A. A., (2011а), Dini alemdegi jurek kontseptinin kyzmeti (kazakh, orys, agylshyn tilderinin materialdar boyynsha). In: Vestnik KazNU. Seriya filologicheskaya. 2(132), 165–167.
• SULTANGUBIYEVA, A. A., (2011b), Jurek kontseptindegi “adam zhagdayynun fisikalyk korinisteri (kazakh, orys, agylshyn tilderinin materialdary boyynsha). In: Vestnik KazNU. Seriya filologicheskaya. 4(134), 195–198.
• TAŞBAŞ, E. (2019), The turkic kinship system. In: Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hung. 72 (2), 245–258. DOI: 10.1556/062.2019.72.2.6
• TEMIRGAZINA, Z. (2013), Cultural Scenarios of Emotions of Sadness, Sorrow and Grief. In: Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research (Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities). 13, 224–229. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.sesh.1440
• TEMIRGAZINA, Z. K./BAKHTIKIREEVA, U. M./et al. (2017), Artifacts as a source of russian and kazakh zoologi-cal terms. In: Information. 20(4A), 2325-2336.
• TEMIRGAZINA, Z./NIKOLAYENKO, S./et al. (2020), "Naive anatomy" in the Kazakh language world picture in comparison with English and Russian. In: XLinguae. 13(2), 3–16. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2020.13.02.01
• TIKHONOV, A. N. (2007), Fraseologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka. Moskva.
• TURSUNALI, A. (2011), Olender. In: https://adebiportal.kz/kz/jazghanhatym/view/55. [accessed 8 I 2020].
• URYSON, Ye. V. (1995), Fundamental'nyye sposobnosti cheloveka i naivnaya anatomiya. In: Voprosy yazy-koznaniya. 3, 3–16.
• URYSON, Ye.V. (2003), Problemy issledovaniya yazykovoy kartiny mira: Analogiya v semantike. Moskva.
• VYSHESLAVTSEV, B.P., (1990), Serdtse v khristianskoy i indiyskoy mistike. In: Voprosy filosofii. 4, 62–88.
• WEILAND-BRECKLE H./SCHUMACHER, P. B., (2018), A direct comparison of metonymic and metaphoric rela-tions in adjective–noun pairs. In: Acta Linguistica Academica. 65, 2–3. 443–472. DOI: 10.1556/2062.2018.65.2–3.8
• YABLOKOVA, T. N. (2016), Sovremennyye podkhody k izucheniyu emotsiy v lingvistike (na materiale an-gliyskogo yazyka). In: Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 6 (60), 2, 180–183.
• YAKOVLEVA, Y. S. (1994), Fragmenty russkoy yazykovoy kartiny mira (modeli prostranstva, vremeni i vospri-yatiya). Moskva.
• YERGALIYEVA, S. Z./MEL'NIK, N. V./et al. (2018), Personal linguistic parametrization of text generation of the internet comments. In: XLinguae. 11(3), 2–15. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2018.11.03.01ZAYATS, I. G., (2017), Predstavleniya o “lokalizatsii” emotsiy v srednevekovom soznanii (na materiale sred-nevekovoy nemetskoy literatury). In: Filologicheskiye nauki v Rossii i za rubezhom. Sankt-Peterburg. 85.
• ZHALELOV, O., (2016), Jureginin tygi bar – Kuttymbet batyr. In: https://e-history.kz/kz/publications/view/zhureginin_tugi_bar__kuttimbet_batir__2099. [accessed 8 XI 2019].
• ZYKOVA, I. (2015), Teoriya i metody lingvokul'turologicheskogo izucheniya fraseologii. In: Przeglad Wschodni-oeuropejski. VI/1. 181–195.

Identifiers

ISSN

2081-1128