Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 24 | 45-56

Article title

Pojęcie „wspólnota międzynarodowa” w retoryce Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości

Content

Title variants

EN
The Concept of „International Community” in the Rhetoric of the International Court of Justice.

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
The subject of this article is the analysis of the chosen judgments of the International Court of Justice due to observe, how the Court uses this term. The Court’s statement in the given scope makes an important part of international debate as to the analyzed concept. At the first glance the Court uses interchangeably the two terms: international society and international community, that are indeed synonymic. However the closer analysis shows, that the Court not only prefer the term “community”, but also connects with it a lot of important factors, like members of this community, it’s values and ideals. The review of some of the Court’s judgments illustrates the spectrum of legal problems that might be connected with the concept of “international community” and the consequences of the uncertainty of this term.

Keywords

Year

Issue

24

Pages

45-56

Physical description

Dates

published
2017

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Zielonogórski

References

  • Chodu, A. (2012), Język na wokandzie: Ach te zapisy! (w:) „In Gremio” 5(78), 11–12.
  • Hart, H.L.A. (1998), Pojęcie prawa. Warszawa.
  • Jennigns, R.Y. (1995), The United Nations at Fifty. The International Court of Justice after Fifty Years, (w:) ,,American Journal of International Law” 89(3), 493–505.
  • Kozłowski, A. (2009), Międzynarodowy Trybunał Sprawiedliwości, (w:) J. Kolasa (red.), Współczesne sądownictwo międzynarodowe. Tom I – Zagadnienia instytucjonalne. Wrocław, 13–45.
  • Statut Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z dnia 26 czerwca 1945 r., Dz. U. 1947, nr 23, poz. 90.
  • Konwencja Wiedeńska o Stosunkach Dyplomatycznych z dnia 18 kwietnia 1961 r., Dz. U. 1965, nr 37, poz. 232.
  • Konwencja Wiedeńska o Stosunkach Konsularnych z dnia 24 kwietnia 1963 r., Dz. U. 1982, nr 13, poz. 98.
  • Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion 11.04.1949, ICJ Reports 1949. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/4/004-19490411-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/64/064-19800524-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Dissenting Opinion by Judge Badawi Pasha. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/caserelated/4/004-19490411-ADV-01-04-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Barcelona Traction. Light and Powers Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain, Preliminary Objections), Judgment 24.06.1964. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/caserelated/50/050-19640724-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Dissenting Opinion by Judge Tanaka. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19640724-JUD-01-06-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Dissenting Opinion by Judge Vellington Koo. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/caserelated/50/050-19640724-JUD-01-05-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Barcelona Traction. Light and Powers Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment 05.02.1970, ICJ Reports 1970. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19700205-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Separate Opinion by Judge Bustamante. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19700205-JUD-01-03-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Separate Opinion by Judge Fitzmaurice. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19700205-JUD-01-04-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Separate Opinion by Judge Tanaka (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19700205-JUD-01-05-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Separate Opinion by Judge Jessup. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19700205-JUD-01-06-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Separate Opinion by Judge Morelli (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19700205-JUD-01-07-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Separate Opinion by Judge Padilla – Nervo. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/caserelated/50/050-19700205-JUD-01-08-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Separate Opinion by Judge Ammoun. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19700205-JUD-01-10-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Dissenting Opinion by Judge Riphagen. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19700205-JUD-01-11-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Teheran (United States of America v. Iran), Judgment 24.05.1980, ICJ Reports 1980. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/64/064-19800524-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].
  • Dissenting Opinion by Judge Lachs. (URL http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/64/064-19800524-JUD-01-01-EN.pdf). [Pobrano 24.06.2017].

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
2080-4814

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-c9f8058d-7ee2-432a-9c4e-73d4b0f5ee59
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.