Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 1 (47) | 54–66

Article title

Transitional Justice in Relationship to Public Sphere and Civil Society: Theoretical Approaches

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The article presents the entitled fields in the framework of their mutual influence. The notion of the public sphere is valuable for understanding the role that civil society plays in transitional justice processes. However transitional justice often reduces the idea of civil society to NGOs and ignores the social movements and civic engagement in the public realm that can be perceived as integral to the creation of new cases for understanding justice in transition. This fact results in the lack of perception of the civil society place in transitional justice processes. Thus the presented paper is based on hermeneutics, critical discourse analysis and dialogue between various theoretical approaches.

Year

Volume

Pages

54–66

Physical description

Contributors

  • Łódź University of Technology (Poland)

References

  • Arendt, H. (1978). The Life of the Mind. San Diego, New York, London: A Harvest Book, Horcourt Inc.
  • Arendt, H. (1998). Human Condition, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Backer, D. (2003). “Civil Society and Transitional Justice: Possibilities, Patterns and Prospects”. Journal of Human Rights, 2(3), pp. 297–313.
  • Baylis, J., & Smith, S. (2008). Globalizacja polityki światowej. Wprowadzenie do stosunków międzynarodowych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  • Bell, C., Campbell, C., & Ní Aoláin, F. (2007). “Transitional Justice: (Re)conceptualising the Field”, International Journal of Law in Context, 2(3), pp. 81–88.
  • Bell, D. (2006). Memory, Trauma and World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Bell, Ch., & Keenan, J. (2004).”Human Rights Nongovernmental Organizations and the Problems of Transition”. Human Rights Quarterly 26, no. 2 pp. 330–74.
  • Buckley-Zistel, S., Koloma Beck, T., Braun, Ch., & Mieth, F. (2014). “Transitional justice theories: An introduction”. In S. Buckley-Zistel, T. Koloma Beck, Ch. Braun, & F. Mieth (Eds.), Transitional justice theories (pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge.
  • Calhoun, C. (1992).”Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere”. In Calhoun, C. (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 1–48). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Castells, M.(2000). The Rise of Network Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark, P., & Palmer, N. (2012). “Challenging Transitional Justice”. In Palmer, N., Clark, P. and Granville, D. (eds) Critical Perspectives in Transitional Justice (pp 1–16). Antwerp: Intersentia
  • Crocker, D.A. (1998) “Transitional Justice and International Civil Society: Toward a Normative Framework”. Constellation, 5(4), 492–517.
  • Darendorf, R. (1994). “Zagrożone społeczeństwo obywatelskie”. In K. Michalski (Ed.), Europa i społeczeństwo obywatelskie. Rozmowy w Castel Gandolfo (pp. 658–667). Kraków: Znak.
  • De Greiff, P. (2011). “Transitional Justice, Security and Development”. World Development Report. Retrieved from: www.web.worldbank.org/archive/website01306/web/pdf/wdr%20background%20paper_de%20greiff_0.pdf.
  • Dumała, A. (1995). “Uczestnicy transnarodowi – podmioty niezależne czy kontrolowane przez państwa?” In E. Haliżak & I. Popiuk-Rysińska (Eds.), Państwo we współczesnych stosunkach międzynarodowych (pp. 160–174. Warszawa: Scholar.
  • Duthie, R. (2009). Building Trust and Capacity: Civil Society and Transitional Justice from a Development Perspective. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice.
  • Dybel, P., & Wróbel, S. (2008). Granice polityczności. Od polityki emancypacji do polityki życia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Alatheia.
  • Gadamer, H-G. (1976). Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Gadamer, H-G. (1989). Truth and Method. New York: Crossroad.
  • Geertz, C. (2003). Interpretacja kultur. Wybrane eseje. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  • Geertz, C. (2005). Zastane światło. Antropologiczne reflekcje na tematy filozoficzne. Wybrane eseje. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  • Giddens, A.(1990). The Concequences of Modernity, Standford: Standford Univrsity Press.
  • Granville, D. (2012). Critical Perspectives in Transitional Justice. Antwerp: Intersentia.
  • Gready, P., & Robins, S. (2017). “Rethinking civil society and transitional justice: lesson from social movements and ‘new’ civil society”. International Journal of Human Rights. pp. 956–975. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1313237.
  • Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Hannerz, U. (2006). Powiązania transnarodowe. Kultura, ludzie, miejsca. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  • Hovil. L., Okello M.Ch. (2011). Editorial Note. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5(3). pp. 1–10. DOI: doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijs002.
  • Cherif Bassiouni, M. (2002). Post-Conflict Justice. Ardsley: Transnational Publishers.
  • Keane, J. (2001). Global Civil Society? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Koselleck, R. (1994). “Trzy światy obywatelskie? Wprowadzenie do porównawczej semantyki społeczeństwa obywatelskiego w Niemczech, Anglii i Francji – zarys dziejów teorii”. In K. Michalski (Ed.), Europa i społeczeństwo obywatelskie. Rozmowy w Castel Gandolfo (pp. 112–122). Kraków: Znak.
  • Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Kritz, N., (1995). Transitional Justice, How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Washington: United States Institute of Peace.
  • Krotoszyński, M. (2017). “Transitional Justice Models and Analytic Philosophy: Towards Theory“. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 46(2), pp. 9–22. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2017201.
  • Kulska, J. (2017). “Dealing with a Trauma Burdened Past: between Remembering and Forgetting”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 46(2), pp. 23–35. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2017202.
  • Mani, R. (2002). Beyond Retribution. Seeking Justice in the Shadows of War. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Wawrzyński, P. (2016). “Remembrance, Identity Politics and Political Transitions: A Comparative Study”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45, pp. 11–21. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2016001.
  • Marszałek-Kawa, J., Wawrzyński, P., & Ratke-Majewska, A. (2017). The Politics of Memory in Post-Authoritarian Transitions, Volume Two: Comparative Analysis. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • May, L. (2012). “Transitional Justice and the Just War Tradition’. In N. Palmer, P. Clark & D. Granville (Eds.) Critical Perspectives in Transitional Justice (pp. 17-30). Antwerp: Intersentia.
  • McAdams, A.J. (1997). Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Mihr, A. (2012). Transitional Justice. Between Criminal Justice, Atonement and Democracy. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.
  • Nawratek, K. (2008). Miasto jako idea polityczna. Kraków: korporacja ha!art.
  • Ossowska, M. (2000). Normy moralne. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Pantazidou, M. (2013). “Treading New Ground: A Changing Moment for Citizen Action in Greece". Development in Practice, 23(5–6), pp. 755–770.
  • Pietrzak, E. (2014). Ku globalnemu społeczeństwu obywatelskiemu. Transgresje idei. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.
  • Ramírez-Barat, C. (2014). “Transitional Justice and the public sphere”. In C. Ramírez-Barat (Ed.) Transitional justice, culture and society: Beyond outreach (pp. 27–48). New York: ICTJ.
  • Rawls, J. (1971). The Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Roht-Arriaza, N., & Mariezcurrena, J. (2006). Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truthversus Justice, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Seters, P. (2008). “Approaching Global Civil Society. In J.W. Walker & A. Thompson (Eds.) Critical Mass, The Emergence of Global Civil Society (pp. 25–39). Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
  • Schabas, W. (2011). “Transitional Justice and the Norms of International Law”. JSIL. Retrieved from: www.jsil.jp/annual_documents/2011/fall/schabas_trans_just911.pdf.
  • Taylor, Ch. (1994). “Kiedy mówimy: społeczeństwo obywatelskie”. In K. Michalski (Ed.), Europa i społeczeństwo obywatelskie. Rozmowy w Castel Gandolfo (pp. 54–80). Kraków: Znak.
  • Teitel, R.G.(2000). Transitional Justice, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Teitel, R.G. (2003). “Transitional Justice Genealogy”, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, pp. 69–94.
  • The UN Refugee Agency Data Base. Retrieved from: www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html.
  • Walzer, M. (1997). Spór o społeczeństwo obywatelskie. In Szacki J. (ed.), Ani książę, ani kupiec. Obywatel. Idea społeczeństwa obywatelskiego w myśli współczesnej. pp. 84–105. Kraków: Znak.
  • Wawrzyński, P. (2017). “The Government’s Remembrance Policy: Five Theoretical Hypotheses”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 46(1), pp. 294–312. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2017119.
  • Winter, S. (2013). Towards Unified Theory of Transitional Justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 7(2), pp. 224–244. DOI: doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijt004.
  • Zaorski-Sikora, Ł. (2007). Etyka, Łódź: Wydawnictwo WSHE.
  • Zlotnik, H. (2001). “Past Trends in International Migration and Their Implications for Future Prospects”. In. E.M.A. Siddique (Ed.) International Migration into the Twenty-First Century: Essays in Honor of Reginald Appleyard (pp. 227–261). Boston: Elgar Publishing.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-cbc2e873-dbcb-479b-9878-ee12b59895ca
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.