2012 | 1(22) | 37-58
Article title

Listy Janowe jako świadectwo wspólnoty przeżywającej kryzys

Title variants
The Johannine Letters as the witness of the community in crisis
Languages of publication
Since antiquity, the three Johannine Letters have been read as the reflection of a crisis that had shaken the Christian communities connected with the author(s) of these epistles. Following this historical interpretation, and despite some recent endeavors to the contrary, 1 John is seen by the overwhelming majority of commentators as a polemic against false doctrine of certain secessionist elements (cf. 2:19); the author’s polemical arguments deal with several controversial points, both christological and ethical. From the study of extra-biblical sources describing early Christian heterodox movements, there has emerged no general agreement as to the identity of the author’s opponents; therefore, scholarly reconstructions of the historical context – the actual views held by these secessionists, derived solely from the texts of 1 and 2 John, have produced a number of different pictures, individually coherent yet ultimately divergent. In order to deal with the doctrinal crisis, the author of 1 John provides a set of criteria for discerning between true and false doctrine. Most importantly, however, he harks back to the principle of eyewitness testimony and upholds the key concept of the beginning as a normative rule in his community’s understanding of their tradition.
Physical description
  • Ashton J., Understanding the Fourth Gospel, Oxford 1991.
  • Berger K., Die impliziten Gegner:Zur Methode des Erschliesens von “Gegnern” in neutestamentlichen Texten, w: D. Lührmann – G. Stecker (red.), Kirche. Festschrift fur Gunther Bornkamm zum 75. Geburstag, Tübingen 1980, s. 373-400.
  • Beutler J., Die Johannesbriefe, Regensburger Neues Testament, Regensburg 2000.
  • Brown R. E., The Community of the Beloved Disciple. The Life, Loves and Hates of an Individual Church in New Testament Times, New York 1979.
  • Brown R. E., The Epistles of John. Translated with Introduction, Notes, and Commentary, The Anchor Yale Bible 30, Garden City, NY 1982, s. 48.
  • Bultmann R., Das Evangelium des Johannes, Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 2, Göttingen 1941.
  • Bultmanna R., Die Drei Johannesbriefe, Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 14, Göttingen 1967.
  • De la Potterie I., ‘Sin is Iniquity’ (I Jn 3, 4), w: I. de la Potterie, S. Lyonnet (red.), The Christian Lives by the Spirit, New York, NY: Alba House 1971, s. 36-55.
  • Dobschütza E. von, Johanneische Studien, „Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche” 8 (1907), s. 4-5.
  • Edwards R. B., The Johannine Epistles, New Testament Guides, Sheffield 1996.
  • Griffith T., A Non-polemical Reading of 1 John: Sin, Christology and the Limits of Johannine Christianity, „Tyndale Bulletin” 49 (1998), s. 253-276.
  • Griffith T., Keep Yourself from Idols. A New Look at 1 John, Journal for the Study of the New Testament. Supplement Series 233, Sheffi eld 2002.
  • Inman K., Distinctive Johannine Vocabulary and the Interpretation of I John 3:9, „Westminster Theological Journal” 40 (1977-78), s. 136-144.
  • Klauck H. –J., Internal Opponents: The Treatment of the Secessionists in the First Epistle of John, „Concilium” 200 (1988), s. 55-65.
  • Klauck, H. –J., Der erste Johannesbrief, Evangelisch-katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 23/1, Zürich und Braunschweig 1991.
  • Kruse C. G., The Letters of John, Th e Pillar New Testament Commentary, Grand Rapids, MI – Cambridge, U.K. 2000.
  • Kubo S., I John 3:9: Absolute or Habitual, „Andrews University Seminary Studies” 7 (1969), s. 50-56.
  • Kügler J., Die Belehrung der Unbelehrbaren: Zur Funktion des Traditionsarguments in 1 Joh, „Biblische Zeitschrift ” 32 (1982), s. 249-254.
  • Law R., The Tests of Life. A Study of the First Epistle of St. John, Edinburgh 1909.
  • Lieu J. L., Us or You? Persuasion and Identity in 1 John, „Journal of Biblical Literature” 127 (2008), s. 806.
  • Lieu J. M., ‘Authority to Become Children of God.’ A Study of 1 John, „Novum Testamentum” 23 (1981), s. 210-228.
  • Lieu J. M., The Theology of the Johannine Epistles, New Testament Theology, Cambridge 1991.
  • Manns F., Le Peche, c’est Belial : 1 Jn 3 :4 a la lumiere du Judaisme, „Revue des sciences religieuses” 62 (1988), s. 1-9.
  • Marcheselli M., Antigiudaismo nel Quarto Vangelo? Presentazione e bilancio degli orientamenti recenti nella ricerca esegetica, „Rivista biblica” 57 (2009), s. 399-478.
  • Martin J. L., History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel, New Testament Library, Louisville, KY – London, U.K. 32003.
  • Menken M.J.J., Th e Opponents in the Johannine Epistles. Fact or Fiction? w: A. Houtman –A. de Jong – M. Misset-van de Weg (red.), Empsychoi Logoi. Religious Innovations in Antiquity. Studies in Honour of Pieter Willem van der Horst, Ancient Judaism and EarlyChristianity 73, Leiden 2008, 191-209.
  • Michl J., Die katholischen Briefe, Regensburger Neues Testament 8, Regensburg 1969.
  • Neufeld D., Reconceiving Texts as Speech Acts. An Analysis of 1 John, Biblical Interpretation Series 7, Leiden 1994.
  • Painter J., 1, 2, and 3 John, Sacra Pagina 18, Collegeville, MN 2002, s. 84-87, 88-94.
  • Painter J., The ‘Opponents’ in 1 John, „New Testament Studies” 32 (1986), s. 48-71.
  • Perkins P., The Johannine Epistles, New Testament Message 21, Wilmington 1979.
  • Robinson J. A. T., The Destination and Purpose of the Johannine Epistles, „New Testament Studies” 7 (1960-1961), s. 56-65.
  • Schanckenburg R., The Johannine Epistles. Introduction and Commentary, New York 1992.
  • Schmid H., Gegner im 1. Johannesbrief? Zu Konstruktion und Selbstreferenz im Johanneischen Sinnsystem, Beiträge zur Wissenschaft vom Alten und Neuen Testament 159, Stuttgart 2002.
  • Schmid H., How to Read the First Epistle of John Non-Polemically, „Biblica” 85 (2004), s. 24-41.
  • Smalley S. S., 1, 2, 3 John, Word Biblical Commentary 51, Waco, TX 1984.
  • Smith D. M., First, Second, and Th ird John, Interpretation Commentary Series, Louisville 1992.
  • Strecker G., Die Anfange der johanneischen Schule, „New Testament Studies” 32 (1986), s. 31-47.
  • Strecker G., The Johannine Letters. A Commentary on 1, 2, and 3 John, Hermeneia. A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible, Minneapolis, MN 1995.
  • Swadling H. S., Sin and Sinlessness in I John, „Scottish Journal of Theology” 35 (1982), s. 206-209.
  • Von Wahlde U. C, ‘Th e Jews’ in the Gospel of John. Fift een Years of Research (1983-1998), „Ephemerides Th eologicae Lovanienses” 76 (2000), s. 30-55.
  • Von Wahlde U. C., Th e Johannine ‘Jews’. A Critical Survey, „New Testament Studies” 28 (1982), s. 33-60;
  • Wahlde U. C. von, The Gospel and Letters of John, t. 3, Commentary on the Three Johannine Letters, Eerdmans Critical Commentary, Grand Rapids, MI – Cambridge, U.K. 2010.
  • Weiss K., Die ‘Gnosis’ im Hintergrund und im Spiegel der Johannesbriefe, w: K.-W. Tröger (red.), Gnosis und Neues Testament, Studien aus Religionswissenschaft und Th eologie, Berlin 1973, s. 341-356.
  • Wróbel M. S., Antyjudaizm a Ewangelia według św. Jana. Nowe spojrzenie na relację czwartej Ewangelii do judaizmu, Lublin 2005.
  • Wurm A., Die Irrlehrer im ersten Johannesbrief, Biblische Studien 8, Freiburg im Breisgau 1903.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.