INTERACTION OF SUBJECTS OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF PRIMARY SCHOOL: RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH

• Authors: FOMIN KATERYNA , OLENA BUDNYK
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Inthis the essence of the problem of organizing interaction of the subjects of the educational process. A review of scientific sources on the research problem is done. Based on empirical research, the results of studying the readiness of primary school teachers to organize interaction in the classroom are presented. The analysis of the survey, in which Ivano-Frankivsk region (Ukraine) teachers participated, was carried out. The subject of the study was to determine the concept of "dialogic interaction", the use of this method in primary school, as well as teachers' difficulties in organizing interactive learning in the classroom: insufficient methodological support, the gap between theoretical knowledge and challenges of school practice. 48.2% of teachers use interaction every day or at each lesson to intensify students' learning activities, to stimulate their cognitive interests, to establish cooperation and co-creation. There are also respondents who do not practice or use this technique very rarely. It was found that some respondents (almost 55%) will have difficulty in organizing interactive interaction in the educational process; 25% - indicated some difficulties using these methods in primary school, 20% - have no difficulty organizing an educational dialogue with students in class.

Keywords

EN

interaction; educational dialogue; teacher training; primary school; communicative activity of students; educational innovations

• Publisher: Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Chełmie
• Journal: Scientific Bulletin of Chełm - Section of Pedagogy
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 29-39

Contributors

author

FOMIN KATERYNA

• Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University (Ukraine)

author

OLENA BUDNYK

• Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University (Ukraine)

References

• Beattie, G., Ellis, A. (2014). The psychology of language and communication. London: Psychology Press, 2014.
• Beauchamp G., Kennewell, S. (2010). Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers & Education. Vol. 54(3), 759-766. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.033.
• Budnyk, O. (2016). Educational Model of a Modern Student: European Scope. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. Series of Social and Human Sciences. Vol. 3 (2-3), 9-14. doi:10.15330/jpnu.3.2-3.9-14.
• Budnyk, O. (2019). Innovative Competence of a Teacher: best European Practices. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Vol. 6(1), 76-89. DOI: 10.15330/jpnu.6.1.76-89.
• Budnyk, O., Mazur, P. (2017). The Hierarchy of Values Among Young People from Schools in the Mountainous Regions (Comparative study on the example of Poland and Ukraine), The New Educational Review, Vol. 47 (1), 53-65. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2017.47.1.04
• Grygorenko, L. V. (1991). Formation of readiness of students of a teacher training university for professional activities in the process of individual work: author's abstract. Candidate Degree of Ped. Sciences: special 13.00.04 "Theory and methodology of vocational education". Harkiv.
• Fomin, K. (2020). Criteria, Indicators and Levels of Research of Future Teachers' Readiness for Organization of Dialogic Teaching for Primary School Students. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. Vol. 7 (1), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.7.1.112-121.
• Fomin, K. (2019). “Features of Projecting the Higher Educational Environment in the Context of Training Teachers to the Organization of Dialogue Education of Primary School Pupils”. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. Vol. 6 (1), 68-75. DOI: 10.15330/jpnu.6.1.67-75.
• Littleton, K., Howe, Ch. eds. (2010). Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction. London: Routledge, 2010.
• Krutetskiy, V. A. (1972). Fundamentals of Pedagogical Psychology. Moskow: Prosveschenie.
• Major, L., Brugha, M., Froehlig, C., Walker, S., Higham, R., Vrikki, M. (2018). A Dialogue About Educational Dialogue: Reflections on the Field and the Work of The Cambridge Educational Dialogue Research (CEDiR) Group [online January 15, 2019]. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/37916282/A_Dialogue_About_Educational_Dialogue_Reflections_on_the_Field_and_the_Work_of_The_Cambridge_Educational_Dialogue_Research_CEDiR_Group
• Matviienko, O. V. (2010).Theoretical and methodological principles of training of future teachers for pedagogical interaction in educational environment of primary school: Dіs. … Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences. Kyiv.
• Moliako, V. O. (1989). Psychological readiness for creative work. Kyiv: Znannia.
• Vasianovych, H. P. (2010). Selected works: in 5 v. V.3: Pedagogical ethics, textbook. Lviv: SPOLOM.
• Warneke, D. (2007). Aktionsforschung und Praxisbezug in der Darf-Lehrerausbildung. Kassel University Press, Kassel.