The Purposefulness and Effectiveness of Supporting Entrepreneurship with Public Funds – EU Funds for the Development of Self-Employment and Startups

• Authors: Dominika Wojtowicz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Purpose: The paper discusses issues associated with using funds that support the development of entrepreneurship – the purpose of the paper is to answer questions regarding the purposefulness and effectiveness of financial instruments from EU funds aimed at the development of�emerging businesses (startups). Methodology: The paper analyzes previously conducted research studies in the fi eld of the discussed topic, it systematizes and describes the fi nancial instruments from EU funds supporting self- employment and startups in their early stages of activity. It also provides an overview of evaluation reports concerning these instruments. The paper also contains a case study: an analysis of the effectiveness of a selected project supporting the development of entrepreneurship (co-fi nanced from EU funds), in which the method of evaluating the net effect of the support in the short term has been used. Findings: An analysis of previously conducted research studies has shown that properly designed State aid targeted at those starting up their own business is sensible, as it provides them with seed capital and it helps them survive the most diffi cult period of the so-called “startup”. However, there is a lack of comprehensive studies to confirm the positive impact of business support interventions carried out using EU funds. The methodology of evaluating the net effect used by the Author in the conducted study has made it possible to identify the actual size of the – positive – impact of the selected project on the growth of self-employment. Limitations: The study revealed some limitations – the method and time of the study allow to capture the phenomenon on a micro-scale, in the short term. The institutions that are involved in the process of allocating funds should develop a comprehensive methodology that implements the idea of evaluating the net effect, allowing to assess the effectiveness of the support at regional and national level in the long term. Originality: The originality of the paper consists in applying the theories and results of previous studies to the Polish practice of supporting businesses at their early stages of development as well as applying the method of evaluating the net effect, which allows to determine the actual impact of the intervention.

Keywords

EN

cohesion policy; EU funds; startups; net effect; evaluation

• Publisher: Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
• Journal: Management and Business Administration. Central Europe
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 21
• Issue: 4(123)
• Pages: 69-85

Contributors

author

Dominika Wojtowicz

• Kozminski University

References

• Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneur Human Capital Inputs and Small Business Longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(4): 551–559.
• Blanchflower, D.G. (2000). Self-Employment in OECD Countries. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 7486.
• Cueto, B. and Mato, J. (2006). An analysis of self-employment subsidies with duration models. Applied Economics, 38: 23–32.
• Del Monte, A. and Scalera, D. (2000). The Life Duration of Small Firms Born Within a Start-up Programme. Evidence from Italy. Regional Studies, 35(1): 11–21.
• Ekspertyza przygotowana na zlecenie Urzędu Marszałkowskiego Województwa Mazowieckiego w Warszawie (2010)., BDKM Grupa Doradcza Sp. z o.o. Warszawa.
• Falter, J.-M. (2001). Self-Employment Entry and Duration in Switzerland. University of Geneva.
• Felsenstein, D., Fleischer, A. and Sidi, A., ( 1998). Market failure and the estimation of subsidy size in a regional entreprenauship programme. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 10: 151–165.
• Fornalczyk ,A. (1998). Rodzaje, formy i instrumenty pomocy publicznej w Unii Europejskiej i w Polsce. In: A. Fornalczyk (red.), Pomoc publiczna dla przedsiębiorstw w Unii Europejskiej i w Polsce. Warszawa: Urząd Komitetu Integracji Europejskiej.
• Georgellis, Y., Sessions, J. and Tsitsianis, N. (2007). Pecuniary and non-pecuniary aspects of self-
• employment survival. Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance, 47(1): 94–112.
• Górniak, J. (2007). Ewaluacja w cyklu polityk publicznych. In: S. Mazur (red.), Ewaluacja funduszy strukturalnych – perspektywa regionalna. Kraków: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie Małopolska Szkoła Administracji Publicznej.
• Holz-Eakin, D., Joulfaian, D. and Rosen H.S. (1994). Entrepreneurial Decisions and Liquidity
• Constraints. The RAND Journal of Economics, 25(2): 334–347.
• Karpiński, A. (1992) Zakres interwencji państwa we współczesnych gospodarkach rynkowych. Próba uogólnienia doświadczeń praktyki światowej. Wrocław.
• Ocena instrumentów wsparcia bezpośredniego przedsiębiorstw. Podsumowanie wyników ewaluacji wybranych Działań SPO WKP.
• Ocena wpływu dofinansowania udzielonego w ramach Działania 3.4 Mikroprzedsiębiorstwa ZPORR 2004-2006 w województwie śląskim na zwiększenie konkurencyjności mikroprzedsiębiorstw poprzez ułatwienie dostępu do specjalistycznego doradztwa oraz podniesienie zdolności inwestycyjnych (2008). Katowice: Górnośląska Agencja Rozwoju Regionalnego S.A. , WYG International Sp. z o.o., PSDB Sp. z o.o.
• Pfeiffer, F. and Reize, F. (2000). Business start-ups by the unemployed – an econometric analysis
• based on firm data. Labour Economics, 7: 629–663.
• Chrastina, D. et al. (2010). Raport o stanie mikro i małych firm w roku 2010. Bank Pekao S.A. oraz PBCS DGA; projekt sfinansowany z środków KE w ramach programu SME Finance Facility.
• Rissman, E.R. (2006). The self-employment duration of younger men over the business cycle. Economic Perspectives, 30(3): 14–27.
• Scarpetta, S., Hemmings, P., Tressel, T. and Woo, J. (2002). The Role of Policy and Institutions for
• Productivity and Firm Dynamics: Evidence from Micro and Industry Data. OECD Economics
• Department Working Papers No. 329.
• Shane, S. (2009).Why Encouraging More People to Become Entrepreneurs Is Bad Poblic Policy? Small Business Economics, 33: 141–149.
• Storey, D.J., (1994), Understanding the small business. London: Routledge.
• Taylor, M.P. (1999). Survival of the fittest? An analysis of Self-Employment Duration in Britain. The Economic Journal, 109(454): C140-C155.
• Tokila, A. (2011). Start-up grants and self-employment duration. School of Business and Economics, University of Jyväskylä (in referee process).
• Tokila, A., Haapanen, M. and Ritsila, J., (2008). Evaluation of investment subsidies: When is deadweight effect zero?, International Review of Applied Economics, 22(5): 585–600.
• van Praag, C.M., Versloot, P.H. (2007). What Is the Value of Entrepreneurship? A Review of Recent Research. Small Business Economics, 29: 351–382.