Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2015 | 1(39) | 13-20

Article title

Sustainable Rural Development or (Sustainable) Rural Livelihoods? Strategies for the 21st Century in Peripheral Regions

Title variants

PL
Zrównoważony rozwój obszarów wiejskich czy (zrównoważone) zabezpieczenie egzystencji (livelihood) mieszkańców? Strategie dla regionów peryferyjnych w XXI wieku

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Ongoing discussions concerning the concept of development applied within the context of peripheral regions (including rural development, regional development, sustainable development, local development, etc.), and particularly its critical deconstruction, encourage us to look for new theoretical approaches and terminological constructs that would be useful in research and design of desired changes taking place in rural areas and that could substitute the contested notion of “development.” The text discusses strengths and weaknesses of “sustainable rural livelihood” — as a concept, as well as a framework of academic analysis and action — in the context of its application within “rural development” studies.
PL
Bieżące dyskusje na temat koncepcji rozwoju wdrażanych w regionach peryferyjnych (w tym rozwoju obszarów wiejskich, rozwoju regionalnego, zrównoważonego rozwoju, rozwoju lokalnego, itp.), a zwłaszcza ich krytyczna dekonstrukcja, zachęcają do poszukiwania nowych ujęć teoretycznych i terminologicznych które mogłyby być przydatne w badaniach i projektowaniu pożądanych zmian zachodzących na obszarach wiejskich, a zarazem mogłyby zastąpić coraz częściej odrzucane pojęcie ‘rozwoju’. Tekst omawia mocne i słabe strony jednej z nowych koncepcji określanych mianem „zrównoważonego zabezpieczenia egzystencji w środowisku wiejskim” (sustainable rural livelihoods ) uwzględniając samo pojęcie, jak i przydatność koncepcji w badaniach naukowych obszarów peryferyjnych, oraz prowadzonych w terenie działań rozwojowych.

Contributors

  • University of Warsaw

References

  • Ahmed, I.I., and M. Lipton. 1997. Impact of Structural Adjustment on Sustainable Rural Livelihoods. A Review of the Literature, IDS Working Paper. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
  • Arce, A. 2003. “Value Contestations in Development Interventions. Community Development and Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches.” Community Development Journal no. 38 (3):199–212.
  • Baumann, P. 2002. Improving Access to Natural Resources for the Rural Poor. A Critical Analysis of Central Concepts and Emerging Trends from a Sustainable Livelihoods Perspective. LSP Working Paper (1), ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/ad683e/ad683e00.pdf.
  • Bonevac, D. 2010. „Is Sustainability Sustainable?” Academic Questions (23):84–101. doi: 10.1007/s12129–009–9152–4.
  • Carney, D. 2002. Sustainable Livelihood Approaches. Progress and Possibilities for Change. London: DFID.
  • Chambers, R., and G.R. Conway. 1992. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods. Practical Concepts for the 21st Century, IDS Discussion Paper. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
  • ¿A dónde vamos? Progreso en diferentes culturas. 2004. La Paz: Agencia Alemana de Cooperación Técnica.
  • Eade, D., and A. Cornwall. 2010. Deconstructing Development Discourse Buzzwords and Fuzzwords. Warwickshire, U.K.: Practical Action Pub in association with Oxfam GB.
  • Ellis, F. 1999. “Rural Livelihood Diversity in Developing Countries. Evidence and Policy Implications.” Natural Resource Perspectives (40):1–10.
  • Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton studies in culture/power/history. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • Esteva, G. 1992. “Development.” In The Development Reader. A Guide to Knowledge and Power, edited by W. Sachs, 6–26. London: Zed Books.
  • Esteva, G., and M.S. Prakash. 1998. Grassroots Post-Modernism. Remaking the Soil of Cultures. London: Zed Books.
  • Haan, L.d., and A. Zoomers. 2005. “Exploring the Frontier of Livelihood Research.” Development and Change no. 36 (1):27–47.
  • Hussein, K. 2002. Livelihoods Approaches Compared. A Multi-Agency Review of Current Practice. London: Department for International Development.
  • Jackson, T. 2009. Prosperity without Growth. Economics for a Finite Planet. London-Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
  • Latouche, S. 1998. L’autre Afrique. Entre don et marché, Bibliothèque Albin Michel Economie. Paris: Albin Michel.
  • Latouche, S. 2004. Survivre au développement. De la décolonisation de l’imaginaire économique à la construction d’une société alternative. Paris: Mille et Une Nuits.
  • Lisocka-Jaegermann, B. 2011a. Kultura w rozwoju lokalnym. Dziedzictwo kulturowe w strategiach społeczno-gospodarczych latynoamerykańskich społeczności wiejskich. Warszawa: Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych UW.
  • Lisocka-Jaegermann, B. 2011b. “Teoria postkolonialna a geografia.” In Koncepcje i problemy badawcze geografii. Profesorowi Wiesławowi Maikowi w 70-lecie urodzin, edited by K. Marciniak, K.G. Sikora and D. Sokołowski, 99–109. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Wyższej Szkoły Gospodarki.
  • Lisocka-Jaegermann, B., and M. Skoczek. 2008/2009. “Areas rurales de la Huasteca, México en el contexto de transformaciones del campo en América.” Anuario Americanista Europeo (6/7):427–445.
  • Lizcano, E. 2006. Metáforas que nos piensan. Sobre ciencia, democracia y otras poderosas ficciones. Madrid: Traficanates de Sueños.
  • Max-Neef, M.A., A. Elizalde, and M. Hopenhayn. 2006. Desarrollo a escala humana. Conceptos, aplicaciones y algunas reflexiones. 3rd ed, Economía Solidaria. Montevideo-Barcelona: Editorial Nordan-Comunidad; lcaria Editorial.
  • McDowell, C., and A.d. Haan. 1997. Migration and Sustainable Livelihoods. A Critical Review of the Literature, IDS Working Paper. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
  • Morse, S., and N. McNamara. 2013. Sustainable Livelihood Approach. A Critique of Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
  • Paton, J. 2008. „What is Left of Sustainable Development?” The Journal of Australian Political Economy (62):94–119.
  • Rakodi, C. 1999. “A Capital Assets Framework for Analysing Household Livelihood Strategies. Implications for Policy.” Development Policy Review no. 17 (3):315–342. doi: 10.1111/1467-7679.00090.
  • Sachs, W. 1992a. The Development Reader. A Guide to Knowledge and Power. London: Zed Books.
  • Sachs, W. 1992b. “Introduction.” In The Development Reader. A Guide to Knowledge and Power, edited by W. Sachs, 1–5. London: Zed Books.
  • Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods. A Framework for Analysis, IDS Working Paper. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
  • Scoones, I. 2010. “Sustainability.” In Deconstructing Development Discourse Buzzwords and Fuzzwords, edited by D. Eade and A. Cornwall, 153–162. Warwickshire, U.K.: Practical Action Pub in association with Oxfam GB.
  • Scoones, I., and W. Wolmer. 2002. Pathways of Change in Africa. Crops, Livestock & Livelihoods in Mali, Ethiopia & Zimbabwe. Oxford: James Currey.
  • Toner, A. 2003. “Exploring Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches in Relation to Two Interventions in Tanzania.” Journal of International Development no. 15 (6):771–781. doi: 10.1002/jid.1030.
  • Touraine, A. 2007. Penser autrement. Paris: Fayard.
  • Veltmeyer, H. 2011. The Critical Development Studies Handbook Tools for Change. Winnipeg-London-New York: Fernwood; PlutoPress.
  • Wallerstein, I.M. 1991. Unthinking Social Science. The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press in association with B. Blackwell.
  • Welzer, H. 2011. Mental Infrastructures. How Growth Entered the World and Our Souls. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung.
  • World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-d2138888-1d00-4929-927a-b6627e94e6a6
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.