Changing the way of thinking: was German ordoliberalism travelling to China in 1978–1985?

• Authors: Nedergaard Peter
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

China after the economic reform process is probably less different from the Western countries than often imagined. Through a profound document analysis, this article’s aim is to assess German ordoliberal influence on the Chinese economic reform agenda via policy learning from 1978 to 1985. Firstly, the methodology of the research and the ideology of ordoliberalism are briefly presented. Ordoliberalism is a version of liberalism that differs considerably from neoliberalism. Secondly, the author verifies the hypothesis that German ordoliberal experts acted as teachers for Chinese leaders during the first phase of the Chinese economic reform process (i.e. around 1978). Thirdly, based on the analysis of the ordoliberal principles, the author determines the similarities between ordoliberalism and the Chinese economic reform process. The results are mixed. China has not become the West because of the economic reform process, but ordoliberalism – not neoliberalism – significantly influenced the market-oriented China.

Keywords

EN

ordoliberalism; Germany; China; China’s economic reforms; liberalism

• Publisher: Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Studiów Międzynarodowych, Uniwersytet Warszawski
• Journal: Przegląd Europejski
• Year: 2024
• Issue: 4(74)
• Pages: 9 - 23

Dates

published

2024

Contributors

author

Nedergaard Peter

• University of Copenhagen

References

• ALBERS Martin (2016), Britain, France, West Germany and the People’s Republic of China, 1969–1982, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• BEIIJING REVIEW (1979), Joint Press Conference, 2 November 1979.
• BEIIJING REVIEW (1982), Constitution of the People’s Republic of China: Adopted on December 4, 1982 by the Fifth National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China At Its Fifth Session, 27 December 1982.
• BEIIJING REVIEW (1982), Constitution of the People’s Republic of China: Adopted on December 4, 1982 by the Fifth National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China At Its Fifth Session, 27 December 1982.
• BEIIJING REVIEW (1984a), Decision of the Central committee of the Communist Party of China on Reform of The Economic Structure: Adopted by the 12th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China at Its Third Plenary Session On October 20, 1984, 29 October 1984.
• BEIIJING REVIEW (1984b), Banking Reform Favours Centralization, 9 April 1984.
• BOWEN Glenn A. (2009), Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method, “Qualitative Research Journal”, vol. 9, no. 2. DOI: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
• BRANDT Loren, RAWSKI Thomas G. (eds) (2008), China’s Great Economic Transformation, Cambridge University Press.
• DUNLOP Claire A., RADAELLI Claudio M. (2022), Policy learning in comparative policy analysis, ”Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice”, vol. 24, no. 1. DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2020.1762077
• EUCKEN Walter (1989) [1939], Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie, 9th edition, Berlin.
• EUCKEN Walter (2004) [1952], Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik, 7th edition, Tübingen.
• HAVERTZ Ralf (2022), The Strong State and ‘The Taming of Freedom’, in: Thomas Biebricher, Peter Nedergaard, Werner Bonefeld (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ordoliberalism, Oxford University Press.
• HIEN Josef (2022), The Social Market Economy and Ordoliberalism – A Difficult Relationship, in: Thomas Biebricher, Peter Nedergaard, Werner Bonefeld (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ordoliberalism, Oxford University Press.
• JIN Qi (1984), Competition, Collaboration Work in Tandem, “Beijing Review”, 14 January 1984.
• JIN Qi (1985), Market Changes to Set Prices Right, “Beijing Review”, 27 May 1985.
• KARSTEN Siegfried G. (1988), China’s Approach to Social Market Economics: The Chinese Variant of Market Socialism Seeks to Escape from the Difficulties of Central Command Planning, “The American Journal of Economics and Sociology”, vol. 47, no. 2. DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1988.tb02018.x
• KARSTEN Siegfried G. (1998), Eucken’s instability thesis revisited ‐ the case of China, “International Journal of Social Economics”, vol. 25, no. 2/3/4. DOI: 10.1108/03068299810193696
• KÖHLER Ekkehard A. (2022), Ordoliberal Economic Policy, in: Thomas Biebricher, Peter Nedergaard, Werner Bonefeld (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ordoliberalism, Oxford University Press.
• LIU Hongru (1985), Regulating Economy With Monetary Policy, “Beijing Review”, 23 December 1985.
• NAUGHTON Barry (1995), Growing Out Of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform, 1978–1993, Cambridge University Press.
• NAUGHTON Barry (2005), The new common economic program: China’s eleventh five year plan and what it means, “China Leadership Monitor”, issue 16.
• MERKLEIN Renate (1980), China ist derzeit ein grosses Laboratorium, “Der Spiegel”, no. 49/1980, https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/china-ist-derzeit-ein-grosses-laboratorium-a-3ad-76b2f-0002-0001-0000-000014332767 (30.11.1980).
• NEDERGAARD Peter, NOBEL Trine C. (2022), The Nordic formula: an analysis of policy learning in sectorial networks of the Nordic Council of Ministers, “Scandinavian Political Studies”, vol. 45(4). DOI: 10.1111/1467-9477.12240
• NEDERGAARD Peter (2023), Shelter from the storm. The ordoliberal world of welfare capitalism, “Przegląd Europejski”, no. 2/2023. DOI: 10.31338/1641-2478pe.2.23.2
• RÖPKE Wilhelm (1979) [1958], Jenseits von Angebot und Nachfrage, Bern–Stuttgart.
• SHI Zhengwen (1979), Special Report: Readjusting the National Economy: Why and How?, “Beijing Review”, 29 June 1979.
• SHIRK Susan L. (1993), The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China, University of California Press.
• SUN Ping (1984), Individual Economy Under Socialism, “Beijing Review”, 13 August 1984.
• TIAN Jiyun (1985), Price System Due for Reform, “People’s Daily”, 28 January 1985.
• TISDELL Clement (1993), Economic development in the context of China: policy issues and analysis, Basingstoke.
• TOURI Klaus (2022), Economic Constitution and the State, in: Thomas Biebricher, Peter Nedergaard, Werner Bonefeld (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ordoliberalism, Oxford University Press.
• WANG Dacheng (1983), Notes from the Editors: An Important Economic Reform, “Beijing Review”, 23 May 1983.
• WEBER Isabella M. (2022), Shooting for an Economic “Miracle”: German Post-War Neoliberal Thought in China’s Market Reform Debate, in: Quinn Slobodian, Dieter Plehwe (eds), Market Civilizations: Neoliberals East and South, New York.
• WHYTE Jessica (2019), The Invisible Hand of Friedrich Hayek: Submission and Spontaneous Order, “Political Theory”, vol. 47, no. 2.
• WORLD ECONOMIC HERALD (1984), Quick Glance at Economic Reform, 13 August 1984.
• WÖRSDÖRFER Manuel (2020), Ordoliberalism 2.0: Towards a New Regulatory Policy for the Digital Age, “Philosophy of Management”, vol. 19. DOI: 10.1007/s40926-020-00134-0
• ZHANG Zhiye (1985), Special Report: Handling Economic Disputes, “Beijing Review”, 18 March 1985.