PL EN


2010 | 41 | 3 | 113-121
Article title

Superficial and systemic diagnosis of family

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The distinction between two types of diagnosis of family was inspired by the concept of surface and source features of personality by R.B. Cattell. By means of existing psychological questionnaires we can only know the surface of consciously available mental phenomena. The same is true in the diagnosis of family. The McMaster model of family, systemic in its assumptions, developed research tools giving access only to the surface of the phenomena. Although they are divided into certain thematic categories they do not reveal what is really important in the family system. In this article, the author, after a detailed discussion of one of the tests based on the McMaster theoretical model, is attempting to identify the source features (here: unavailable for conscious cognition) of the family, hereinafter called systemic traits. In this research the exploration factor analysis was used. Three perspectives of the opinion of the family were maintained (like in the Family Assessment Measure). Factor analysis allowed identification of three factors for each perspective of the family assessment. Confirmative analysis proved a satisfactory match (using RMSEA, GFI and AGFI statistics). The accuracy of the identified systemic model was then tested by a confirmation study (confirmative factor analysis using Amos from SPSS). The authors also prepared a provisional questionnaire for measuring these systemic traits of the family. The tool proved to be promising and the work worth continuing. Incidentally, it turned out that the characteristics of the family system are relatively independent of personality traits of family members.
Year
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
113-121
Physical description
Contributors
  • University of Łódź
References
  • Andersen, J.Z. & White, G.D. (1986). An empirical investigation of interaction and relationship patterns in functional and dysfunctional nuclear families and stepfamilies.Family Process, 25, 38-51.
  • Barbaro de, M. (1994). Struktura rodziny (The structure of the family). In: B. de Barbaro (ed.), Wprowadzenie do systemowego rozumienia rodziny (Introduction to the systemic understanding of the family, p. 45-55.Kraków: Collegium Medicum UJ.
  • Baucom, D.H., Epstein, N., Rankin, L.A. & Burnett Ch.K. (1996). Assessing Relationship Standards: The Inventory of Specific Relationship Standards.Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 72-86.
  • Beauvale, A., Barbaro de, B., Furgał, M. & Namysłowska, I. (2002). Niektóre psychometryczne własności Kwestionariuszy do badania rodziny (Some psychometric properties of family questionnaires).Psychiatria Polska, vol. XXXVI, 1, p. 29-40.
  • Cierpka, M. (1996).Handbuch der Familiendiagnostik (Handbook for family diagnosis).Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  • Cierpka, M. & Frevert, G. (1994).Die Familienbögen.Göttingen: Hogrefe-Verlag GmbH & Co.
  • Doherty, W. J. & Colangelo N. (1984). The Family FIRO Model: A modest proposal for organizing family treatment.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10, 19-29.
  • Epstein, N.B. & Bishop, D.S. (1981). Problem centered systems therapy of the family. In: A.S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (red.),Handbook of family therapy(444-452). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
  • Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M. & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, vol. 9, nr 2, 171-180.
  • Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S. & Baldwin, L. M. (1982). McMaster Model of Family Functioning: A View of The Normal Family. In: F. Walsh (ed.), Normal Family Processes. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Ferguson, G. & Takane, Y. (1997).Analiza statystyczna w psychologii i pedagogice (The statistical analysis in psychology and pedagogy).Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Garson, D. (8.06.2009). Structural Equation Modeling.http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/structur.htm
  • Jabłoński, M., Dudek, D., Furgał, M., Datka, W. & Zięba, A. (2007). Wykorzystanie kwestionariusza Manfreda Cierpki w analizie wsparcia rodzinnego u pacjentów z ostrą białaczką (Use of Manfred Cierpka questionnaire in the analysis of the family support in patients with acute leukaemia).Psychiatria Polska, vol. XLI, 6, p. 799-812.
  • McDaniel, S. H., Hepworth, J. & Doherty, W. J. (1992).Medical Family Therapy.New York: Basic Books.
  • McDonald, L., Kysela, G., Drummond, J. & Cathy Wiles, M. & W. (2009). Assessment of the Clinical Utility of a Family Adaptation Model.http://www.quasar.ualberta.ca/cfrrp/famadap.html
  • Namysłowska, l., Barbaro de, B., Paszkiewicz, E., Siewierska, A., Furgał, M., Drożdżowicz, L., Józefik, B. & Beauvale, A. (2002). Kwestionariusze Manfreda Cierpki do Oceny Rodziny (Manfred Cierpka questionnaires for family assessment).Psychiatria Polska, vol. XXXVI, 1, p. 17-28.
  • Pervin, L. A. (1993).Personality: theory and research.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Ridenour, T.A., Daley, J.G. & Reich, W. (1999). Factor analyses of the Family Assessment Device.Family Process, 38, 497-510.
  • Schiller, M., Dickstein, S., Seifer, R., Miller, I., Keitner, G., Sameroff, A. J. & Rasmussen, S (1998). Levels of Family Assessment: I. Family, Marital, and Parent-Child Interaction.Journal of Family Psychology, vol. 12, 1, 7-22
  • Spanier, G.B. (1976). Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 1, 15-28.
  • Steinhauer, P., Santa Barbara, J. & Skinner, H. (1984). The process the model of family functioning.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 29, 89-97.
  • Świętochowski, W. (2002). Kliniczna i empiryczna użyteczność wybranych systemowych modeli rodziny (Clinical and empirical application of the selected models of the family system).Psychologia Rozwojowa, 7, 5, 59-74.
  • Walsh, F. (1982). Conceptualizations of Normal Family Functioning. In: F. Walsh (Ed.),Normal Family Processes.New York: Guilford Press.
  • Zakrzewska, M. (1994).Analiza czynnikowa w budowaniu i sprawdzaniu modeli psychologicznych (Factor analysis in developing and verifying psychological models).Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-d40549d0-b03a-496b-9e59-7b5560b2276f
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.