Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2014 | 22 | 4 | 179-193

Article title

The Value for Money for Transport Infrastructure Projects and Its Marketing Components – Conceptual Thoughts and Reflections


Title variants

Languages of publication



Purpose: There is a need to insure effectiveness in public transport infrastructure capital outlays. The Value for Money (VfM) concept has been embedded in political economy and management without a clear methodological framework and accepted definitions. This paper addresses methodological boundaries and opportunities for implementation of the VfM concept with special consideration to its marketing components. Methodology: A literature review and assessment of practical experience has been completed. An evaluation of the VfM logic is also provided. The VfM functions and application as an analytical, management and marketing tool are analyzed. Findings: The VfM project assessment methodology can be used to insure the best possible input costs and impacts ratio. The maximization of VfM is possible if this approach is correctly and fully implemented. Additional methodological and conceptual work is needed to ensure its full applicability. This concerns also marketing elements of the VfM concept. Originality: The paper presents a complex approach to VfM as an analytical and management procedure. It contributes to research advancement in this insufficiently explored area. Keywords: value for money, infrastructure, government, value for money 3E approach, value for money, marketing








Physical description





  • Allen Consulting Group (2007). Performance of PPPs and Traditional Procurement in Australia. Report to Infrastructure Partnerships Australia. Melbourne.
  • Antinoja, E., Eskiocak, O., Kjennerund, M., Rozenkopf, I. and Schatz, F. (2011). Value for Money: Current Approaches and Evolving Debates. London: London School of Economics.
  • Bidne, D., Kirby, A., Luvela, L., Shattuck, B., Standley, S. and Stephen Welker, S. (2011). The Value for Money Analysis, A Guide for More Effective PSC and PPP Evaluation. American University School of Public Affairs/National Council on Public-Private Partnerships, Washington, D.C.
  • British Columbia Ministry of Transportation (2012). Project Report: Achieving Value for Money – William R. Bennett Bridge Project. Vancouver Ministry of Transportation.
  • Burger, Ph. (2008) Public-Private Partnerships: In Pursuit of Risk Sharing and Value for Money. Winterthur, Switzerland: OECD.
  • Burger, P. and Hawkesworth, I. (2011). How To Attain Value for Money: Comparing PPP and Traditional Infrastructure Public Procurement. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1.
  • Ireland (2007). Value for Money and Policy Review Initiative Guidance Manual, Dublin: Department of Finance, Central Expenditure Evaluation Unit.
  • DFID (2009). A Strengthened Approach to Economic Appraisals, How To Note, Value for Money Department, http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Documents/publications1/how-to-economic-appraisal.pdf.
  • DFID (2010). Writing a Business Case, How To Note. London: Value for Money Department.
  • DFID (2011a). DFID’s Approach to Value for Money (VfM). London: Department for International Development.
  • DFID (2011b). DFID’s Approach to Value for Money (VfM). London: Department for International Development.
  • DFID (2011c). How to Note: Guidance of Using the Revised Logical Framework. London: Department for International Development.
  • DFID (2011d). Spot-Check of Economic Appraisals and Logframes. Evidence presented to Parliamentary Select Committee. London: Department for International Development.
  • DFID (2011f). Value for Money Core Script. London: Department for International Development.
  • DFID (2013). How to note, Guidance on reviewing and scoring projects, London: Department for International Development.
  • DFID (2014). Transport: DFID economist guide, http://www.transportlinks.org/Economist%20Guide/English/Intro.htm.
  • Diamond, J. (2005). Establishing a performance management framework for government, Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 40: 159–183.
  • European Investment Bank (2012). Value for Money Analysis: The EPEC/PPP Guide.
  • Fitzgerald, P. (2004). Review of Partnerships Victoria Provided Infrastructure: Final Report to the Treasurer. Melbourne: Growth Solutions Group.
  • Gray, G. and Hoel, L. (1992). Public Transportation. Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Hawkesworth, P. (2010). How to Attain Value for Money: Comparing PPP and Traditional Infrastructure Public Procurement. Annual OECD network meeting of senior PPP officials. Paris: OECD.
  • HM Treasury (2004). Value for Money (VfM) Assessment Guidance. London
  • HM Treasury (2013). Planning for Economic Infrastructure, Report By The Comptroller And Auditor General HC 595 Session 2012–13. London.
  • Hunt, S. (1976). Marketing Theory: Conceptual Foundations of Research in Marketing. Columbus: Grid Publishing, Inc.
  • Hunt, S. (1983). Marketing Theory: The Philosophy of Marketing Science. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
  • IEG (World Bank Group) (2010). Cost-Benefit Analysis in World Bank Projects. Fast Track Brief. Washington, DC.
  • Infrastructure Ontario (2007), Assessing Value For Money, A Guide To Infrastructure Ontario’s Methodology. Toronto.
  • Kotler, P. (1980). Marketing Management. Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey: Northwestern University, Prentice Hall.
  • Lien, L. (2013). Value for Money in Large Public Sector Infrastructure Projects, Parliamentary Note. Singapore: Ministry of Finance. BY
  • Mishan, E.J. (1976). Cost-Benefit Analysis. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
  • Morallos, D. and Amekudzi, A. (2008). The State of the Practice of Value for Money Analysis in Comparing Public Private Partnerships to Traditional Procurements. Public Works Management Policy, 13(2): 114–125.
  • Morallos, D., Amekudzi, A.A., Ross, C., Meyer, M.D. (2009). Value for Money Analysis in U.S. Transportation Public-Private Partnerships. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2115: 27–36.
  • OECD (2008). Public-Private Partnerships: In Pursuit of Risk Sharing and Value for Money. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD (2010). Dedicated Public-Private Partnership Units: A Survey of Institutional and Governance Structures. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Poate, D. and Barnett, Ch. (2003). Measuring Value for Money? An independent review of DFID’s Value for Money, (VFM) Indicator, Public Service Agreement 2003–2006, Evaluation Report, EV645. London: Department for International Development.
  • Prokopowicz, A. (2013). Interdisciplinary innovation in transportation. Corpus Christi.
  • Prokopowicz, A. (2014a). Innovation in transportation and logistics – an interdisciplinary approach, Washington, D.C.
  • Prokopowicz, A. (2014b). Value for Money in Infrastructure Projects – Major Issues. Houston.
  • Queensland Reconstruction Authority (2010). 2010/11 Queensland flood and cyclone disaster. Value for Money Strategy
  • Rafael, A., Bujanda, A. and Valdez-Ceniceros, A. (2010). Valuing Public Sector Risk Exposure in Transportation Public-Private Partnerships. College Station. Texas: University Transportation Center for Mobility.
  • Ray, A. (1984). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Issues and Methodologies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Sandhusen, R. (2008). Marketing. Barron's Educational Series.
  • UKAID, Adam Smith International (2012). Measuring and Maximising Value for Money in Infrastructure Programmes. London.
  • University of Cambridge (2013). A Brief Guide to Value for Money, www.admin.cam.ac.uk.
  • U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Transportation (2011). Value for Money. State of the Practice, Washington, D.C.
  • Ward, W.A., Deren, B.J. and D'Silva, E.H. (1991). The Economics of Project Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide (EDI Technical Materials). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • World Bank (2010). Transformation through Infrastructure: Issues and Concept Note. Washington, DC.
  • Yescombe, E.R. (2011). Value for Money in PPPs. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.