PL EN


2017 | 21 | 119-141
Article title

When Did Pompey the Great Engage in his imitatio Alexandri?

Authors
Selected contents from this journal
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The aim of this article is to revisit the issue of Pompey the Great’s imitatio Alexandri, especially the timetable for its beginnings and development. Previous studies of the subject have indicated that either the Roman general was involved in imitating the Macedonian king since his youth, or he did not do so at all. Meanwhile, this article presents evidence indicating that the most likely scenario implies that the image of Pompey as the Roman Alexander was created during his eastern campaign against Mithridates. Moreover, it was probably Theophanes of Mytilene, Pompey’s friend and trusted advisor, who developed this theme. Additionally, there is evidence indicating that Pompey tried to limit the use of imitatio Alexandri primarily to the eastern parts of the Roman Empire, fearing that an ambiguous perception of Alexander in Rome would harm his image.
Year
Volume
21
Pages
119-141
Physical description
Contributors
author
References
  • Abascal J. M. 2002. La fecha de la promoción colonial de Carthago Nova y sus repercusiones edilicias. Mastia 1, 21–44.
  • Amela Valverde L. 2000. Las ciudades fundadas por Pompeyo Magno en Occidente. Pompaelo, Lugdunum Convenarum y Gerunda. Polis 12, 7–41.
  • Amela Valverde L. 2001a. Inscripciones honoríficas dedicadas a Pompeyo Magno. Faventia 23/1, 87–102.
  • Amela Valverde L. 2001b. El áureo de Cn. Pompeyo Magno (RRC 402), acuñado en Amisos (Ponto). GacNum 140, 5–13.
  • Amela Valverde L. 2001c. La inscripción de Cupra Maritima, la colonia de Valentia y la lex plotia agraria. Saguntum 33, 65–74.
  • Amela Valverde L. 2002a. Las clientelas de Cneo Pompeyo Magno en Hispania. Barcelona.
  • Amela Valverde L. 2002b. Las emisiones de bronce con cabeza / proa de Arse-Saguntum: Una nota. GacNum 147, 3–14.
  • Amela Valverde L. 2010. El áureo de Cn. Pompeyo Magno (RRC 402/1). Espacio, Tiempo y Forma. Serie II, Historia Antigua 23, 205–216, [on-line] https://doi.org/10.5944/etfii.23.2010.1766.
  • Amela Valverde L. 2017. Las emisiones romanes Pompeyanas de Hispania. Barcelona.
  • Antela-Bernárdez B. 2006. From Alexander to Augustus: Imperialism, war and society in the Hellenism. In T. Ñaco del Hoyo and I. Arrayás Morales (eds.), War and Territory in the Roman World / Guerra y territorio en el mundo romano, 31–40. Oxford.
  • Badian E. 1958. Foreign Clientelae (264–70 B.C.). Oxford.
  • Badian E. 1976. Das Bildnis Alexanders d. Gr. auf antiken Münzen. Diskussionsbeitrag. In E. Badian (ed.), Alexandre le Grand: image et réalité, 271–274. (Entretiens Hardt 22). Geneve.
  • Beltrán Lloris F. and Pina Polo F. 1994. Roma y los Pirineos: la formación de una frontera. Chiron 24, 103–129.
  • Boschung D. 1986. Überlegungen zum Liciniergrab. JDAI 101, 257–287.
  • Breglia L. P. D. 1972. La provincia di Cilicia e gli ordinamenti di Pompeo. RAAN 47, 327–387.
  • Brunt P. A. 1971. Italian manpower 225 B.C. – A.D. 14. Oxford, [on-line] http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01427.0001.001.
  • Buschor E. 1949. Das hellenistische Bildnis. Münich.
  • Cesano S. L. 1942. I Fasti dell Repubblica Romana sulla moneta di Roma. (SdN 1 fasc.2). Roma.
  • Dreizehnter A. 1975. Pompeius als Städtegründer. Chiron 5, 213–245.
  • Ebel Ch. 1975. Pompey’s organization of Transalpina. Phoenix 29, 358–373, [on-line] https://doi.org/10.2307/1087281.
  • Esch T. 2011. Zur kommunalen Neuordnung Kleinasiens durch Pompeius: Kilikia Pedias und Pontos – Ein Vergleich. In E. Schwertheim (ed.), Studien zum antiken Kleinasien VII, 35–96. (Asia Minor Studien 66). Bonn.
  • Esteve Forriol J. 1978. Valencia, fundación romana. Valencia.
  • Fulińska A. 2015. Nowy Aleksander. Ikonografia i legenda Mitrydatesa VI Eupatora. Kraków.
  • Giuliani L. 1986. Bildnis und Botschaft. Hermeneutische Untersuchungen zur Bildniskunst der römischen Republik. Frankfurt.
  • Green P. 1978. Caesar and Alexander: aemulatio, imitatio, comparatio. AJAH 3, 1–26.
  • Gruen E. S. 1998. Rome and the myth of Alexander. In T. W. Hillard, R. A. Kearsley, C. E. V. Nixon and A. M. Nobbs (eds.), Ancient History in a Modern University, vol. 1: The Ancient Near East, Greece, and Rome, 178–191. Grand Rapids.
  • Hatt J. J. 1966. Histoire de la Gaule Romaine (120 avant J.-C. – 451 aprés J.-C.). Colonisation ou colonialisme?. Paris.
  • Hölscher T. 2004. Provokation und Transgression als politisches Habitus in der späten römischen Republik. MDAI(R) 111, 83–106.
  • Johansen F. 1977. Ritratti antichi di Cicerone e Pompeo Magno, AnalRom 8, 39–69.
  • Johansen F. 1994. Roman portraits: Catalogue, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, vol. 1. Copenhagen.
  • Junker K. 2007. Die Porträts des Pompeius Magnus und die mimetische Option. MDAI(R) 113, 69–94.
  • de Kersauson K. 1996. Un portrait de Pompée le Grand dans les collections du Louvre. Revue du Louvre et des musees de France 46/1, 39–44.
  • Kopij K. 2010. Opera Pompei and the theology of victory. SAAC 14, 167–178.
  • Kopij K. 2016. The context and dating of the Pompey’s aureus (RRC 402). NumAntCl 45, 109–127.
  • Kopij K. 2017. Auctoritas et dignitas: studium prestiżu i propagandy w okresie późnej Republiki Rzymskiej na przykładzie rodu Pompejuszy (gens Pompeia Magna) w świetle źródeł archeologicznych i pisanych. Kraków, [on-line] https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.556069.
  • Kühnen A. 2008. Die Imitatio Alexandri in der römischen Politik (1. Jh. v. Chr. – 3. Jh. n. Chr.). Münster.
  • Kyparissis N. and Peek W. 1941. Attische Urkunden. AM 66, 218–239.
  • La Rocca E. 1987-1988. Pompeo Magno ‘Novus Neptunus’. BCAR 92, 265–292.
  • Leach J. 1978. Pompey the Great. London.
  • Mader G. 2006. Triumphal elephants and political circus at Plutarch, Pomp. 14.6. CW 99/4, 397–403, [on-line] https://doi.org/10.2307/4353063.
  • Magie D. 1950. Roman Rule in Asia Minor: To the End of the Third Century After Christ. Princeton.
  • Martin J. D. 1998. Did Pompey engaged in imitatici Alexandri? In C. Deroux (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 9, 23–51. Brussels.
  • Mezquíriz Irujo M. Á. 1966. Excavación estratigráfica en Pamplona (Campaña 1965). In J. M. de Motes (ed.), Problemas de la prehistoria y de la etnología vasca, 165–168. Pamplona.
  • Michel D. 1967. Alexander als Vorbild für Pompeius, Caesar und Marcus Antonius: archäologische Untersuchungen. (Collection Latomus 94). Brussels.
  • Olshausen E., Biller J. 1984. Historisch-geographische Aspekte der Geschichte des Pontischen und Armenischen Reiches 1. Untersuchungen zur historischen Geographie von Pontos unter den Mithridatiden. Wiesbaden.
  • Ortiz de Zárate S. C. 1996. Los gentilicios hispanorromanos de Celtiberia y su expresión social. HispAnt 20, 149–170.
  • Pena Gimeno M. J. 1989. Consideraciones sobre el estatuto jurídico de Valentia. Saguntum 22, 303–318.
  • Poulsen V. H. 1948. A note on the Licinian tomb. JWalt 11, 8–13.
  • Poulsen F. 1951. Catalogue of Ancient Sculpture in the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek. Copenhagen.
  • Ribera i Lacomba A. and Calvo Galvez M. 1995. La primera evidencia arqueológica de la destrucción de Valentia por Pompeyo. JRA 8, 19–40, [on-line] https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047759400015956.
  • Rivet A. L. 1988. Gallia Narbonensis. Southern Gaul in Roman Times. London.
  • Roldán Hervás J. M. 1972. El elemento indígena en las guerras civiles en Hispania: aspectos sociales. HispAnt 2, 77–124.
  • Schweitzer B. 1947. Die Bildniskunst der römischen Republik. Leipzig.
  • Spranger P. P. 1958. Der Große. Untersuchungen zur Entstehung des historischen Beinamens in der Antike. Saeculum 9, 22–58, [on-line] https://doi.org/10.7788/saeculum.1958.9.jg.22.
  • Stewart A. 1993. Faces of Power: Alexander’s Image and Hellenistic Politics. (Hellenistic Culture and Society 11). Berkeley.
  • Syme R. 1964. Sallust. (Sather Classical Lectures 33). Berkeley, Los Angeles.
  • Trunk M. 2008. Studien zur Ikonographie des Pompeius Magnus – die numismatischen und glyptischen Quellen. JDAI 123, 101–170.
  • Tsirkim Yu. B. 1981. The south of Spain in the civil war of 40-45 BC. ArchEsp, 54, 91–100.
  • Villaronga L. 1979. Numismática antigua de Hispania: Iniciación a su estudio. Barcelona.
  • Vollenweider M.-L. 1955. Verwendung und Bedeutung der Porträtgemmen für das politische Leben der römischen Republik, MusHelv 12/2, 96–111.
  • Watkins T. H. 1979. Roman citizen colonies and italic right. In Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, 59-99. (Collection Latomus 164). Brussels.
  • Weippert O. 1972. Alexander-Imitatio und römische Politik in republikanischer Zeit. Würzburg.
  • Welles C. B. 1965. Alexander’s historical achievement. G&R 12, 216–229, [on-line] https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500015370.
  • Ziegler R. 1993. Ären kilikischen Städte und Politik des Pompeius in Südostkleinasien. Tyche 8, 203–219.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-d68e4f4e-16ed-4388-9144-c8adc4a58e38
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.