PL EN


2014 | 14 | 3 | 16-29
Article title

USE OF INTERACTIVE WEB-BASED EXERCISES FOR ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING: LEARNERS’ PERCEPTIONS

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The study investigated the learner perceptions of a CALL component in a blended language learning context. 52 Taiwanese college students attended instructional classroom sessions and did weekly online assignments in the form of interactive web-based exercises over one semester. Their learning performance was measured by means of two computer-based language assessments at the mid-point and final part of the semester. Learners’ perceptions of the interactive web-based exercises were elicited by a computerized survey conducted at the end of the semester. The results reported on the survey revealed that participants perceived the interactive web-based exercises as interesting but only modestly so. This was probably attributable to the difficulty level of the created exercises and a lack of diverse exercise formats. Even so, having easy access, receiving immediate feedback, allowing multiple attempts, and enabling self-paced learning were mentioned as benefits of the constructed exercises. More importantly, most participants reported the effectiveness of these exercises in improving their reading comprehension and vocabulary leaning. This confirmed language assessment results that demonstrated significant gains in reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge. Implications include suggestions for language teachers and program developers for improving the way web-based learning activities are created and implemented.
Year
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
16-29
Physical description
Contributors
author
References
  • Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 35(6), 499–517.
  • Beauvois, M. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28(1), 177–190.
  • Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and Researching Computer Assisted Language Learning. New York: Longman.
  • Chun, D., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183–198.
  • Felix, U. (2001). The web’s potential for language learning: The student’s perspective. ReCALL, 13(1), 47–58.
  • Felix, U. (2003). Language learning online: Deconstructing the myths. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 118–138.
  • Gettys, S., Imhof, L. A., & Kautz, J. O. (2001). Computer-assisted reading: The effect of glossing format on comprehension and vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34(2), 91–99.
  • Huang, H., & Liou, H. (2007). Vocabulary learning in an automated graded reading program. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 64–82.
  • Hubbard, P. (2009). A general introduction to computer assisted language learning. In P. Hubbard (Ed.), Computer Assisted Language Learning: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. Volume I – Foundations of CALL (pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge.
  • Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based instruction to promote active learning: Learners’ perspectives. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 139–156.
  • Lefever-Davis, S., & Pearman, C. (2005). Early readers and electronic texts: CD-ROM storybook features that influence reading behavior. The Reading Teacher, 58(5), 446–454.
  • Lunde, K (1990). Using electronic mail as a medium for foreign language study and instruction. CALICO Journal, 7(3), 68–78.
  • Murphy, P. (2007). Reading comprehension exercises online: The effects of feedback, proficiency and interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 107–129.
  • Nagata, N. (1999). The effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive glosses. Foreign Language Annals, 32(4), 469–479.
  • Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning: Parameters for designing a blended language environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(2), 163–178.
  • Sagarra, N., & Zapata, G. C. (2008). Blending classroom instruction with online homework: A study of student perceptions of computer-assisted L2 learning. ReCALL, 20(2), 208–224.
  • Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51–54.
  • Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL, 19(1), 57–78.
  • Strepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 165–180.
  • Suh, J. (2002). Effectiveness of CALL writing instruction: The voices of Korean EFL learners. Foreign Language Annals, 35(6), 669–679.
  • Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004). Application of a CALL system in the acquisition of adverbs in English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 203–235.
  • Ushida, E. (2005). The role of students’ attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 49–78.
  • Wang, Y. (2014). Developing and evaluating an adaptive Business English self-learning system for EFL vocabulary learning. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1–7.
  • Wang, Y., Tsao, H., & Chen, G. (2013). Integration of computer technologies into an English language learning classroom. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 3(11), 1389–1400.
  • Wang, Y., & Wang, C. (2010). Exploring EFL Taiwanese university students’ perceptions of a collaborative CALL environment. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 6241, 421-432.
  • Zapata, G. C., & Sagarra, N. (2007). CALL on hold: The delayed benefits of an online workbook on L2 vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 153–171.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-d6b56fa3-ba9a-4fff-8fc3-f08c48b2d690
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.