Prawda i fałsz wypowiedzi literackiej

• Authors: Magryś Roman

Title variants

EN

Truth and Falsity of Literary Statements

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

The article Truth and Falsity of Literary Statements investigates the issue of logical values, and consequently communication related status of sentences in indicative mood occurring in works of literature. The problem is discussed with reference to theoretical assumptions of classical logic, intuitionistic logic, and other possible intensional logics as well as phenomenological concepts proposed by Roman Ingarden. In this context it is suggested that intensional systems, mainly intuitionistic logic be adequately applied to identify logical value of literary sentences. As a result, it is assumed that the logical value of literary sentences depends on the specific logical system selected; according to the standards of intuitionistic logic, literary statements are true, likely or false. In this context it seems necessary to revise Roman Ingarden’s phenomenological assumption that sentences in indicative mood in a work of fiction do not have objective point of reference. It is suggested that such sentences be recognised as false, and therefore indicative of the group of their intentional meanings as a specific model of reality which can be deemed true or false.

Keywords

EN

formal logic; fiction; truth; intention; falsehood; literature; intensional logic; phenomenology

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
• Journal: Dydaktyka Polonistyczna
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 6 (15)
• Pages: 72-91

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Magryś Roman

• Uniwersytet Rzeszowski

References

• Barbour I.G., Mity, modele, paradygmaty, Studium porównawcze nauk przyrodniczych i religii, tłum. M. Krośniak, Kraków 2016.
• Bremer J.W., Wprowadzenie do logiki, Kraków 2008.
• Czernecka-Rej B., Pluralizm w logice, Lublin 2014.
• Czernecka-Rej B., Pluralizm logiczny [w:] Logika, cz. 1, red. ks. S. Janeczek, M. Tkaczyk OFMConv., A. Starościc, Lublin 2018.
• Fila M., Filozofia i logika intuicjonizmu, file:///C:/Users/UYTKOW~1/AppData/Local/Temp/1077-1457.pdf [6.08.2020].
• Głowiński M., Okopień-Sławińska A., Sławiński J., Zarys teorii literatury, Warszawa 1991.
• Hinz H., Nauka [w:] Słownik literatury polskiego oświecenia, red. T. Kostkiewiczowa, Wrocław 1991.
• Ingarden R., O dziele literackim, Warszawa 1988.
• Jakubowska U., Terapia humanistyczno-egzystencjalna [w:] Psychoterapia. Teoria, red. L. Grzesiuk, Warszawa 2005.
• Łukasik A., Realizm naukowy [w:] Metodologia nauk. Czym jest nauka?, cz. 1, red. ks. S. Janeczek, M. Walczak, A. Starościc, Lublin 2919.
• Markiewicz H., Główne problemy wiedzy o literaturze, Kraków 1980.
• Martuszewska A., Mimesis [w:] Słownik literatury polskiej XIX wieku, red. J. Bachórza, A. Kowalczykowa, Wrocław 1991.
• Miodońska-Brookes E., Kulawik A., Tatara M., Zarys poetyki, Warszawa 1978.
• Moszczeńska W., Metodologia historii. Zarys krytyczny, Warszawa 1977.
• Otwinowska B., Imaginacja [w:] Słownik literatury polskiego oświecenia, red. T. Kostkiewiczowa, Wrocław 1991.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15584/dyd.pol.15.2020.5