Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2015 | 234 | 227-245

Article title

Social aspects of the impact of software agents on participants of business processes in knowledge based organisations

Content

Title variants

PL
Społeczne aspekty oddziaływania agentów programowych na uczestników procesów biznesowych w organizacjach opartych na wiedzy

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The use of agent systems in knowledge dissemination is a key element of business processes of an organisation. When building agent systems to support such activities, it is important to determine the impact of agents on participants of business processes. Agent units designed to support the operation of an organisation, especially a knowledge-based organisation, should be considered as a system whose main task is to support business processes of such an organisation, participate in knowledge management processes and support the different participants of business processes. The aim of this paper is to analyse the results of conducted research experiments against social features of the examined group. The first part of the paper presents research in this area carried out by the authors. The second part shows the results of research into usability of software agents in the context of social features of the analysed group.
PL
Zastosowanie systemów agentowych w dyseminacji wiedzy jest kluczowym elementem procesów biznesowych w dowolnej organizacji. Podczas budowy systemów agentowych dla wspomagania działań biznesowych ważne jest określenie oddziaływania agentów na uczestników procesów biznesowych. Zespoły agentów zaprojektowane dla wspomagania działania organizacji, szczególnie organizacji opartej na wiedzy, powinny być rozważane jako pewien system, którego głównym zadaniem ma być wspomaganie procesów biznesowych takiej organizacji, uczestnictwo w procesach zarządzania wiedzą i wspomaganie różnych uczestników procesów biznesowych. Celem tego artykułu ma być analiza wyników prowadzonych eksperymentów badawczych w konfrontacji z cechami społecznymi analizowanej grupy. Pierwsza część artykułu przedstawia badania w tym obszarze przeprowadzone przez autorów. Druga część obejmuje wyniki badań dotyczące użyteczności agentów programowych w kontekście cech społecznych analizowanej grupy.

Year

Volume

234

Pages

227-245

Physical description

Contributors

References

  • Alonso F., Fuertes J.L., Martínez L., Soza H. (2008), Measuring the Social Ability of Software Agents, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 3-10.
  • Alonso F., Fuertes J.L., Martínez L., Soza H. (2009), Towards a Set of Measures for Evaluating Software Agent Autonomy, Proceedings of the 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Angeli de A., Johnson G.I., Conventry L. (2001), The Unfriendly User: Exploring Social Reactions to Chatterbots [in:] K.T. Helander (ed.), Proceedings of The International Conference on Affective Human Factors Design, Asean Academic Press, London.
  • Franklin D., Abrao A. (2000), Measuring Software Agent's Intelligence, Proceedings of International Conference: Advances in Infrastructure for Electronical Business, Science and Education on the Internet, L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Graesser A.C., Millis K., D’Mello S.K., Hu X. (2014), Conversational Agents Can Help Humans Identify Flaws in the Science Reported in Digital Media [in:] D. Rapp, J. Braasch (eds.), Processing Inaccurate Information: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives from Cognitive Science and the Educational Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 139-158.
  • Gris I., Novick D., Camacho A., Rivera D., Gutierrez M., Rayon A. (2014), Recorded Speech, Virtual Environments, and the Effectiveness of Embodied Conversational Agents, IVA, Boston, MA, pp.182-185.
  • Jordan B., Henderson A. (1995), Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice; “The Journal of the Learning Sciences”, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 39-103.
  • Kim J., Moon J.Y. (1998), Designing Toward Emotional Usability in Customer Interfaces – Trustworthiness of Cyber-banking System Interfaces, “Interacting with Computers”, Vol. 10, pp. 1-29.
  • Kopka B., Żytniewski M. (2014), The System Ergonomics and Uusability as a Measurement of the Software Agents Impact to the Organization [in:] Advances in Ergonomics In Design, Usability Special Populations, Part II, AHFE Conference 2014, pp. 21-35.
  • Luck M., McBurney P., Preist C. (2003), Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing (A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing), AgentLink.
  • Moss S. (2000), Messy Systems – The Target for Multi Agent Based Simulation [in:] S. Moss, P. Davidsson (eds.), Multi Agent Based Simulation, “LNCS, Vol. 1979, Springer-Verlag.
  • Norman D.A. (2005), Human-centered Design Considered Harmful, “Interactions”, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 14-19.
  • Rus V., D’Mello S.K., Hu X., Graesser A.C. (2013), Recent Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems with Conversational Dialogue, “AI Magazine”, Vol. 34(3), pp. 42-54.
  • Sivakumar N., Vivekanandan K. (2012), Measures for Testing the Reactivity Property of a Software Agent, “International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence”, Vol. 1, No. 9, The Science and Information Organization.
  • Stanek S. red. (2005), Modele hybrydowe w podejmowaniu finansowych decyzji gospodarczych, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Katowicach, Katowice.
  • Stanek S. red. (2008), Rozwój informatycznych systemów wieloagentowych w środowiskach społeczno- gospodarczych, Placet, Warszawa.
  • Zubrow D., Hayes D., Siegel D. (1994), Maturity Questionnaire, Special Report CMU/SEI-94-SR-7, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/94.reports/94.sr. 007.html (accessed: 11.04.2015).
  • Żytniewski M. Kopka B. (2014), Indicators of Software Agents Usability and Ergonomic, Post Conference Decisions in Situations of Endangerment, Wrocław.
  • Żytniewski M., Kopka B. (2015a), Indicators of Software Agents Usability and Ergonomic [in:] Procedings of I. MEDIAL INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE SERIES “Decisions in situations of endangerment”, “The Journal of Science of the Gen. Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces”, Wrocław.
  • Żytniewski M., Kopka B. (2015b) The Proposition of Agents’ Usability Analysis Method Based on an Analysis of Polish Enterprises, HAIDM Conference, Istanbul 4-8 May 2015.
  • Żytniewski M., Kowal R., Sołtysik A. (2013a) The Outcomes of the Research in Areas of Application and Impact of Software Agents Societies to Organizations So Far. Examples of Implementation in Polish Companies [in:] “Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems”, Vol 1, Proceedings of the 2013 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, pp. 1181-1187.
  • Żytniewski M., Kowal R., Sołtysik A. (2013b) Creation of Software Agents’ Society from the Perspective of Implementation Companies. The Advantages of Their Use, the Problems of Construction and Unique Features [in:] “Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics” in series “Business Informatics”, Vol. 3(29).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
2083-8611

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-d8c64e26-be60-41d6-a1c5-2d94e5c224c3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.