2013 | 150 | 60-75
Article title

Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital Interaction and Voluntary Disclosure

Title variants
Languages of publication
The purpose of this article is to analyze the relationship between the concept of intellectual capital (IC) and the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR). The common theoretical background of both approaches and their mutual influence was underlined. The necessity of convergence of these two concepts by the inclusion of information on IC to CSR report in order to create one integrated set of information was emphasized.
Physical description
  • Bansal B.: Evolving Sustainability: a Long Litudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development. "Strategic Management Journal" 2005, Vol. 26, No. 3.
  • Barney J.B.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. "Journal of Management" 1991, Vol. 17, No. 1.
  • Barney J.B., Clark D.: Resource-Based Theory. Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007.
  • Barnett M.: Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. "Academy of Management Reviews"2007, Vol. 32, No. 3.
  • Beattie V., Thomson S.: Lifting the Lid on the Use of Content Analysis to Investigate Intellectual Capital Disclosures. "Accounting Forum" 2007, Vol. 31, No. 2.
  • Bhattacharya C.B., Sen S.: Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiative. "California Management Review" 2004, Vol. 47, No. 1.
  • Bontis N.: Assessing Knowledge Assets: a Review of the Models Used to Measure Intellectual Capital. "International Journal of Management Reviews" 2001, Vol. 3, No. 1.
  • Branco M., Rodrigues L.L.: Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource Based Perspectives. "Journal of Business Ethics" 2006, Vol. 69, No. 2.
  • Branco M., Rodrigues L.L.: Social Responsibility Disclosure; a Study of Proxies for the Public Visibility of Portuguese Banks. "British Accounting Review" 2008, Vol. 40, No.2.
  • Brown S., Hillegeist S.: How Disclosure Quality Affects the Level of Information Asymmetry. "Review of Accounting Studies" 2007, Vol. 12, No. 2-3.
  • Carroll A.B.: The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. "Business Horizons" July-August 1991.
  • Castillo Polo F., Gallardo Vazquez D.: Social Information Within Intellectual Capital Report. "Journal of International Management" 2008, Vol. 14, No. 4.
  • Cinquini L., Passetti E., Tenucci A., Frey M.: Analyzing Intellectual Capital Information in Sustainability Reports: Some Empirical Evidence, "Journal of Intellectual Capital" 2012, Vol. 13, No. 4.
  • Colbert B.A.: The Complex Resource-based View: Implications for Theory and Practice in Strategic Human Resource Management. "Academy of Management Review" 2004, Vol. 28, No. 3.
  • Cordazzo M.: IC Statement Versus Environmental and Social Reports: an Empirical Analysis of their Convergence in the Italian Context. "Journal of Intellectual Capital 2005, Vol. 6, No. 3.
  • Cuganesan S.: Reporting Organizational Performance in Managing Human Resource. Intellectual Capital or Stakeholder Perspectives? "Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting" 2006, Vol. 10, No. 3.
  • Déniz de la Cruz M., Pérez De Saá P.: A Resource-based View of Corporate Responsiveness Toward Employees. "Organization Studies" 2003, Vol. 24, No. 2.
  • Deegan C., Rankin M.: Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? An Analysis of Environmental Disclosures by Firms Prosecuted Successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. "Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal" 1996, Vol. 9, No. 2.
  • Dumay J.C., Tull J.A.: Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Price-sensitive Australian Stock Exchange Announcements. "Journal of Intellectual Capital" 2007, Vol. 8, No. 2.
  • Freeman R.E.: Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston 1984.
  • Garcia-Ayuso M.: Factors Explaining the Inefficient Valuation of Intangibles. "Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal" 2003, Vol. 16, No. 1.
  • Garcia-Meca E., Martinez I.: The Use of Intellectual Capital Information in Investment Decisions. An Empirical Study Using Analyst Report. "International Journal of Accounting" 2007, Vol. 42, No. 1.
  • Guthrie J., Petty R., Ricceri F.: Using Content Analysis as a Research Method to Inquire into Intellectual Capital Reporting. "Journal of Intellectual Capital" 2004, Vol. 5, No. 2.
  • Guthrie J., Cuganesan S., Ward L.: Extended Performance Reporting: Evaluating Corporate Social Responsibility And Intellectual Capital Management. "Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting" June 2007, Vol. 1, No. 1.
  • Hall R.: A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabilities to Sustainable Competitive Advantage. "Strategic Management Journal" 1993, Vol. 14, No. 8.
  • Harte G., Owen, D.: Environmental Disclosure in the Annual Reports of British Companies: A Research Note. "Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal" 1991, 4(3).
  • Hillman A., Keim G.D.: Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What's the Bottom Line? "Strategic Management Journal" 2001, Vol. 22, No. 2.
  • Holland J., Johanson U.: Value Relevant Information on Corporate Intangibles. Creation, Use and Barriers in Capital Market. "Journal of Intellectual Capital" 2003, Vol. 4, No. 2.
  • Ijiri Y.,: Theory of Accounting Measurement. "Accounting Research Studium" 1975, No. 10, Sarasota fl., American Accounting Association.
  • Jaruga A., Fijałkowska J.: Rachunkowość i zarządzanie kapitałem intelektualnym. Koncepcje i praktyka. ODDK, Gdańsk 2002.
  • Komisja Europejska: Odnowiona strategia UE na lata 2011-2014 dotycząca społecznej odpowiedzialności przedsiębiorstw, 2011.
  • McWilliams A., Siegal D.S., Wright P.M.: Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. "Journal of Management Studies" 2006, Vol. 43, No. 1.
  • Mangena M., Pike R., Li J.: Intellectual Capital Disclosure Practices and Effects on the Cost of Equity Capital: UK Evidence, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Edinburgh 2010.
  • Meritum: Proyeto Meritum: Guidelines for Managing and Reporting Intangibles. Meritum, Madryt 2002.
  • Mont O., Leire C.: Socially Responsible Purchasing in Supply Chain: The Present State in Sweden and Lessons from the Future. Working paper, International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, University of Lund, Lund 2008.
  • Oliveira L., Rodrigues L.L., Craig R.: Intellectual Capital Reporting in Sustainability Reports. "Journal of Intellectual Capital" 2010, Vol. 11, No. 4.
  • Pasetti E., Tenucci A., Cinquini L., Frey M.: Intellectual Capital Communications: Evidence form Social and Sustainability Reporting. Working paper series, Aug. 3, 2009, (10.03.2012).
  • Pedrini M.: Human Capital Convergences in Intellectual Capital and Sustainability Reports. "Journal of Intellectual Capital" 2007, Vol. 8, No. 2.
  • Reed K.K., Lubatkin M., Srivivasan N.: Proposing and Testing an Intellectual Capital-Based View of the Firm. "Journal of Management" 2006, Vol. 43, No. 4.
  • Sirsly C.A., Lamertz K.: When Does a Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Provide a First-mover Advantage. "Business & Society" 2007, Vol. 47, No. 3.
  • Sumita T.: Intellectual Assets & Management Reporting, METI 2005.
  • Stewart T.A.: The New Wealth of Organisations. Nicholas Brealey, London 1997.
  • Striukova L., Unerman J., Guthrie J.: Corporate Reporting of Intellectual Capital: Evidence from UK Companies. "British Accounting Review" 2008, Vol. 40, No. 4.
  • Sveiby K.E.: The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge- based Assets. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco 1997.
  • Toms J.S.: Firm Resource, Quality Signals and the Determinations of Corporate Environmental Reputation: Some UK Evidence. "British Accounting Review" 2002, Vol. 34, No. 3.
  • Tsoutsoura M.: Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance, Haas School of Business 2004, available at: documents/FinalPaperonCSR_PDFII.pdf.
  • Villalonga B.: Intangible Resources, Tobin's q, and Sustainability of Performance Differences. "Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization" 2004, Vol. 54, No. 2.
  • Wood D. J., Jones R. E.: Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Social Corporate Performance. "The International Journal of Organizational Analysis" 1995, 3(3).
  • Woodward D., Edwards P., Birkin F.: Some Evidence on Executives' Views of Corporate Social Responsibility. "British Accounting Review" 2001, Vol. 33, No. 2.
  • Wright P.M., Dunford B.B., Snell S.A.: Human Resource and the Resource Based View of the Firm. "Journal of Management" 2001, Vol. 27, No. 6.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.