PL EN


2016 | 46 | 145-167
Article title

Educational Mismatches and Earnings in Poland: Are Graduates Penalised for Being Overeducated?

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Qualification mismatch is defined as the difference between the level of qualifications held by employees and those required by the type of work they do. Basing on Kiker et al. (1997), a measure of overeducation and undereducation is proposed on the basis of the ISCO 08 classification of occupations. The dominant education level is determined for a given occupation’s 3-digit group on the basis of the distribution of education levels for employees in that occupation. Each individual having exactly the dominant level of education is considered well-matched. Those with higher levels of education are considered overeducated, those with lower levels − undereducated. An extended Mincer wage regression model with Heckman correction for non-random selection is estimated, using LFS data for Poland for the second quarter of 2013. Significant wage penalties are found in cases of overeducation status, along with positive wage premia for being undereducated, this confirming findings to be noted in the literature of other countries. Applying an approach after Duncan and Hoffman (1981), I find significant positive returns to years of overschooling and negative for underschooling. Young participants on the labour market (graduates) are less penalised for being overeducated, which suggests their overeducation is not necessarily a manifestation of lower ability.
Year
Issue
46
Pages
145-167
Physical description
Dates
published
2016
Contributors
  • Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw
References
  • Allen, Jim, and Rolf van der Velden R. 2001. “Educational Mismatches Versus Skill Mismatches: Effects on Wages. Job Satisfaction and On-the-Job Search.” Oxford Economic Papers 53 (3): 434−452.
  • Barone, Carlo, and Luis Ortiz. 2011. “Overeducation among European University Graduates: A Comparative Analysis of Its Incidence and the Importance of Higher Education Differentiation. Higher Education 61 (3): 325−337.
  • Bauer, Thomas K. 2002. “Educational Mismatch and Wages: A Panel Analysis.” Economics of Education Review 21: 221−229.
  • Bratti, Massimiliano, Robin Naylor, and Jeremy Smith J. 2008. “Heterogeneity in the Returns to Degrees: Evidence from the British Cohort Study 1970.” DEAS, University of Milan, Departamental Working Paper No. 2008‒40.
  • Budría, Santiago, and Pedro Telhado Pereira. 2005. “Educational Qualifications and Wage Inequality: Evidence for Europe.” IZA Discussion Paper. No. 1763.
  • Card, David. 1999. “The Causal Effect of Education on Earning.” In: Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3, Part A, ed. Orley C. Ashenfelter and David Card, 1801−1863. North Holland: Elsevier.
  • Chevalier, Arnaud. 2003. “Measuring Over-Education.” Economica 70: 509−531. Chevalier, Arnaud, and Joanne Lindley. 2009. “Overeducation and the Skills of UK Graduates.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 172 (2): 307−337.
  • Duncan, GGreg J., and Saul D. Hoffman. 1981. “The Incidence and Wage Effects of Overeducation.” Economics of Education Review 1 (1): 75−86.
  • Freeman, Richard D. 1976. The Overeducated American. New York: Academic Press.
  • Groot, Wim, and Henriëtte Maasen van den Brink. 2000. “Overeducation in the Labour Market: A Meta-Analysis.” Economics of Education Review 19 (2): 149−158.
  • Kiersztyn, Anna. 2013. “Stuck in a Mismatch? The Persistence of Overeducation during Twenty Years of the Post-communist Transition in Poland.” Economics of Education Review 32: 78−91.
  • Kiker, B.F, Maria C. Santos, and M. Mendes de Oliveira. 1997. “Overeducation and Undereducation: Evidence for Portugal.” Economics of Education Review 16 (2): 111−125.
  • Mavromaras, Kostas G., Seamus McGuinness, Nigel C. O’Leary, Peter J. Sloane, and Zhang Wei. 2010. “Job Mismatches and Labour Market Outcomes: Panel Evidence on Australian University Graduates.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 5083.
  • McGuinness, Seamus. 2006. “Overeducation in the Labour Market.” Journal of Economic Surveys 20: 387−418.
  • Ortiz, Luis, and Aleksander Kucel. 2008. “Do Fields of Study Matter for Over- Education? The Cases of Spain and Germany.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 49 (4−5): 305−327.
  • Sicherman, Nachum. 1991. “Overeducation in the Labor Market.” Journal of Labor Economics 9 (2): 101−122.
  • Sloane, Peter J., Harminder Battu, and Paul Seaman. 1999. “Overeducation, Undereducation and the British Labour Market.” Applied Economics 31 (11): 1437−1453.
  • Spence, Michael. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 87 (3): 355−374.
  • Thurow, Lester C. 1975. Generating Inequality: Mechanisms of Distribution in the U.S. Economy. New York: Basic Books.
  • Tsai, Yuping. 2010. “Returns to Overeducation: A Longitudinal Analysis of the U.S. Labor Market.” Economics of Education Review 29 (4): 606−617.
  • Verdugo, Richard R., and Naomi Turner Verdugo. 1989. “The Impact of Surplus Schooling on Earnings: Some Additional Findings.” Journal of Human Resources 24 (4): 629−643.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-da0e4646-808a-42e3-9922-e84e1db52817
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.