Art in Action: An Analysis of Political Graffiti in Washington D.C.
Languages of publication
This study examines how graffiti, both the symbolic artifact itself and the act of producing graffiti, is used as a means of navigating power dynamics via counter-hegemonic political expression. Because social phenomena may only be understood in relation to the historic materialistic context in which it occurs, this study will focus on graffiti specifically within the city of Washington D.C. Sixteen randomly selected D.C. neighborhoods located in Wards 1, 2 and 8 were surveyed for graffiti deemed to be political. Once documented and coded, a content analysis was conducted to detect themes in how graffiti operates politically, focusing on both the content of the graffiti as well as the social context in which it existed. With a sample size of over 800, the sheer prevalence of political graffiti supports the assertion that graffiti does function in this capacity. By conducting such a study as this, graffiti was shown to be a highly complex social phenomenon; one that plays a central role in the placemaking process of the public sphere, issues of criminality and political legitimacy, and the autonomy of a community to express itself politically. These results are discussed in terms of how they adhere to a Marxian theoretical framework set forth by the work of Antonio Gramsci ( 1989), Walter Benjamin (1936), Louis Althusser (1971), and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (1990; 1993).
- Akın, Canan and N. Sezin Kıpçak. (2016). “Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction: Reconsidering Benjamin’s Aura in ‘Art of Banks.’” Journal of Communication and Computer 13(4):153-158.
- Althusser, Louis. (1971). On Ideology. New York: Verso Books.
- Banet-Weiser, Sarah. (2012). Authentic: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. NYU Press.
- Barnett, Claudia. (1994). “The Death of Graffiti: Postmodernism and the New York City Subway.” Studies in Popular Culture 16(2):25–38.
- Benavides-Vanegas, Farid Samir. (2005). “From Santander to Camilo and Ché: Graffiti and Resistance in Contemporary Colombia.” Social Justice 32(1 (99)):53–61.
- Benjamin, Walter. (1936). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
- DC Office of Planning. n.d. “Neighborhood Planning | Op.” Retrieved October 5, 2018
- Denise Lawrence-Zuniga and Setha Low. (2003). “Introduction.” in The Anthropology of Space and Place: Locating Culture . Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
- District of Columbia Board of Elections. (2018). “Current Elected Officials.”
- Federal Election Commission. (2017). “Official 2016 Presidential General Election Results.”
- Ferrell, Jeff. (1995). “Urban Graffiti.” Youth & Society – YOUTH SOC (27):73–92.
- Geertz, Clifford. (1973). “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In The Interpretation of Cultures, 310–23. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
- Gramsci, Antonio. (1989). Prison Notebooks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Kramer, Ronald. (2010). “Painting with Permission: Legal Graffiti in New York City.” Ethnography 11(2):235–53.
- Lachmann, Richard. (1988). “Graffiti as Career and Ideology.” American Journal of Sociology 94(2):229–50.
- Levin, Sam. (2018a). “Anti-Fascists Were Stabbed at a Neo-Nazi Rally. Then Police Tried to Charge Them.” The Guardian, December 5.
- Levin, Sam. (2018b). “Police Worked with Violent Pro-Trump Activist to Prosecute Leftwing
- Moreau, Terri and Derek H. Alderman. (2011). “Graffiti Hurts And The Eradication Of Alternative Landscape Expression.” Geographical Review 101(1):106–24.
- Nagle, Angela. (2017). Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars From 4Chan And Tumblr To Trump And The Alt-Right. Winchester, UK; Washington, USA: Zero Books.
- Papenfuss, Mary. (2018). “Protesters Charged In Clash With Hate Group Accuse California Cops Of Collusion.” Huffington Post, February 10.
- Ramos, Valeriano. (1982). “The Concepts of Ideology, Hegemony, and Organic Intellectuals in Gramsci’s Marxism.” Theoretical Review (27).
- Robin Pogrebin and Scott Reyburn. (2017). “A Basquiat Sells for ‘Mind-Blowing’ $110.5 Million at Auction.” The New York Times, May 19.
- Sharaf, Radwa Othman. (2015). “Graffiti as a Means of Protest and Documentation in the Egyptian Revolution.” African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review 5(1):152–61.
- Said, Edward (1978) Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
- Salib, Peter. (2015). “The Law of Banksy: Who Owns Street Art?” The University of Chicago Law Review, 82(4), 2293-2328.
- Sammond, Nic and Anna Creadick. (2014). “The Writing on the Wall: Learning and Teaching Graffiti.” Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy, 24(1-2), 138-154.
- Snyder, Gregory J. (2011). Graffiti Lives: Beyond the Tag in New York’s Urban Underground. New York: NYU Press.
- Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty and Sarah Harasym. (1990). The Post-Colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues. New York: Routledge.
- Spivak, Gayatri Chakrevorty. (1993). “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). “American Community Survey 5-year estimates.” Retrieved from Census Reporter Profile page for Washington, DC
- Varghese, C.S. (2009). “Gayatri Spivak’s Theory of Subalternity.” In Art and Activism in Arundhati Roy: A Critical Study Based on Spivak’s Theory of Subalternity. New Dehli: Sarup Book.
- Waldron, Travis. (2018). “This Guy’s Got 2 Words For The President, And He’s Putting Them All Over D.C.” Huffington Post, January 11.
- Zizek, Slavoj. (2012). Mapping Ideology. New York: Verso Books.
Publication order reference