Integration of 2D and TLS data using GIS to create a database for the Paphos Agora Project

• Authors: Ćwiąkała Paweł , Matwij Karolina , Matwij Wojciech , Miszk Łukasz , Winiarska Weronika
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Excavations in the Nea Paphos Hellenistic-Roman agora have been conducted by the Chair of Classical Archaeology of the Jagiellonian University of Krakow since 2011 under the direction of Professor E. Papuci-Władyka. The main goal of the excavation is to fully uncover the Agora and to reconstruct the ways in which this public space was used. One of the methodological goals set for the research was the creation of a state-of-the-art database (work on which began in 2013) that could import and adapt data obtained from modern equipment. Of equal importance was the implementation of a 3D-format within the database (this had been under discussion for over a decade) and the enabling of GIS software data integration. Faro Focus laser scanner data was chosen to form the graphical core as it fulfilled the most important visual documentation criteria for the Paphos Agora Project database. This article presents the main premises on which the new Nea Paphos Hellenistic-Roman Agora Project database is based (on the integration of 3D and 2D data from 2011–2014) and the different stages of its creation, which made use of the latest methods of developing such tools for the purposes of archaeological excavations.

Keywords

EN

3D scanning; GIS in archaeology; 3D database; agora Nea Paphos; integrating 2D and 3D data

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 19
• Pages: 203-232

Contributors

author

Ćwiąkała Paweł

author

Matwij Karolina

author

Matwij Wojciech

author

Miszk Łukasz

author

Winiarska Weronika

References

• Ambraseys N. 2009. Earthquakes in the Mediterranean and Middle East. New York.
• Apollonio F. I., Benedetti B., Gaiani M. and Baldissini S. 2011. Construction, management and visualization of 3D models of large archaeological and architectural sites for e-heritage GIS systems. In K. Pavelka (ed.), 23rd International CIPA Symposium Proceedings, Prague, 12–16 September 2011, B.2.97–B.2.104. Prague.
• Avern G. J. 2013. Discourse on the use of a 3D model as a record of excavation. In. F. Contreras, M. Farjas and F. J. Melero (eds.), Fusion of Cultures. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010, 9–13. Oxford.
• Bekker-Nielsen T. 2000. The foundation of Nea Paphos. In S. Isager and I. Nielsen, Proceedings of the Danish Institute at Athens 3, 195–207. Aarhus.
• Berggren Å., Dell’Unto N., Forte M., Haddow S., Hodder I., Issavi J., L ercari N., Mazzucato C., Mickel A. and Taylor J. S. 2015. Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel’s edge. Antiquity 89, 433–448.
• Campana S. and Remondino F. 2008. Fast and detailed digital documentation of archaeological excavations and heritage artifacts. In A. Posluschny et al. (eds.), 36–42.
• Campana S., Bianchi G., Fichera G. A., Lai L. and Sordini M. 2012. 3D recording and total archaeology: from landscapes to historical buildings. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 1/3, 444–460.
• Dellepiane M., Dell’Unto N., Callieri M., Lindgren S. and Scopigno R. 2013. Archeological excavation monitoring using dense stereo marching techniques. Journal of Cultural Heritage 14/2, 201–210.
• Dell’Unto N. 2014a. The use of 3D models for intra-site investigation in archaeology. In F. Remondino and S. Campana (eds.), 3D Recording and Modeling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Theory and Best Practices, 151–158. (BAR-IS 2598). Oxford.
• Dell’Unto N. 2014b. 3D models and archaeological investigation. In H. Isto (ed.), Perspectives to Archaeological Information in the Digital Society, 55–71. Uppsala.
• Doneus M. and Neubauer W. 2005a. 3D Laser scanner on archaeological excavations. In S. Dequal (ed.), International Cooperation to Save the World’s Heritage. Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium CIPA, Torino, 26 September–1 October 2005, 226–231. Turin.
• Doneus M. and Neubauer W. 2005b. Laser scanners for 3D documenta- tion of stratigraphic excavations. In M. Baltsavias, A. Gruen, L. van
• Gool and M. Pateraki (eds.), Recording, Modelling and Visualization of Cultural Heritage, Ascona, 22–27 May 2005, 193–204. London, Leiden, New York, Philadelphia, Singapore.
• Forte M. 2014. 3D archaeology: new perspectives and challenges – the example of Çatalhöyük. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 2/1, 1–29.
• Forte M., Dell’Unto N., Jonsson K. and Lercari N. 2015. Interpretation process at Çatalhöyük using 3D. In I. Hodder and A. Marciniak (eds.), Assembling Çatalhöyük, 43–58. (Themes in Contemporary Archaeolo- gy 1). Leeds. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5276566 (status as of Dec. 31st, 2015).
• Galeazzi F. 2015 (in press). Towards the definition of best 3D practices in archaeology: assessing 3D documentation techniques for intra-site data recording. Journal of Cultural Heritage.
• González-Aguilera D., Muñoz-Nieto A., Gómez-Lahoz J., Herrero-Pascual J. and Gutierrez-Alonso G. 2009. 3D digital surveying and modelling of cave geometry: application to Palaeolithic rock art. Sensors 9, 1108–1127.
• Grussenmeyer P., Landes T., Alby E. and Carozza L. 2010. High resolution 3D recording and modelling of the bronze age cave “Les Fraux” in Périgord (France). In J. P. Mills, D. M. Barber, P. E. Miller and I. Newton (eds.), Proceedings of the ISPRS Commis- sion 5 Mid-Term Symposium ‘Close Range Image Measurement Techniques’, Newcastle upon Tyne, 21–24 June 2010, 262–267. (International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 38/5). Newcastle upon Tyne.
• Hämmerle M., Höfle B., Fuchs J., Schröder-Ritzrau A., Vollweiler N. and Frank N. 2014. Comparison of Kinect and Terrestrial LiDAR Capturing Natural Karst Cave 3-D objects. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 11/11, 1896–1900.
• Harris E. C. 1989. Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. London.
• Hermon S. 2008. 3D modelling and virtual reality for the archaeological research and museum communication of cultural heritage. In I. Oberländer-Târnoveanu (ed.), Museum and the Internet: Presenting Cultural Heritage Resources On-line. Selected Papers from the Inter- national Summer Course in Buşteni, Romania, 20–26 September 2004, 57–73. Budapest.
• Hermon S. and Nikodem J. 2008. 3D modelling as scientific research tool. In A. Posluschny et al. (eds.), 140–146.
• Hermon S., Pilides D., Amico N., D’Andrea A., Iannone G. and Chamberlain M. 2010. Arc 3D and 3D Laser-Scanning. A comparison of two alternate technologies for 3D data acquisition. In. J. F. Melero et al. (eds.), 55–58.
• Hermon S. and Kalisperis L. 2011. Between the real and the virtual: 3D visualization in archaeological research – expectations and prospects. Virtual Archaeology Review 2/4, 59–63.
• Hodder I. 1999. The Archaeological Process: an Introduction. Oxford. Katsianis M., Tsipidis S. and Kalisperakis I. 2014. Archaeological research in the digital age. In C. Papadopoulos et al. (eds.), 46–54.
• Koutsoudis A., Vdima B., Ioannakis G., Arnaoutoglou F., Pavlidis G. and Chamzas C. 2014. Multi-image 3D reconstruction data evalu- ation. Journal of Cultural Heritage 15/1, 73–79.
• Lambers K. and Remondino F. 2008. Optical 3D measurement tech- niques in archaeology: recent developments and applications. In A. Posluschny et al. (eds.), 27–35.
• Lerma J. L., Navarro S., Cabrelles M. and Villaverde V. 2010. Terres- trial laser scanning and close range photogrammetry for 3D archaeological documentation: the Upper Palaeolithic Cave of Parpallo´ as a case study. JAS 37, 499–507.
• Lieberwirth U. 2008. 3D GIS voxel-based model building in archaeology. n A. Posluschny et al. (eds.), 1–8.
• Lieberwirth U., Fritsch B., Metz M., Neteler M. and Kühnle K. 2015. Applying low budget equipment and open source software for high resolution documentation of archaeological stratigraphy and features. In A. Traviglia (ed.), Across Space and Time. Papers from the 41st Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Perth, 25–28 March 2013, 104–119. Amsterdam.
• Melero J. F., Cano P. and Revelles J. (eds.) 2010. Fusion of Culture. Abstracts of the 38 Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, 6–9 April 2010. Granada.
• Miszk Ł., Ostrowski W. and Hanus K. 2016. Close range and UAV-based photogrammetry in the Paphos Agora Project research and documenta- tion process. In. E. Papuci-Władyka and A. Dobosz (eds.), In the Heart of the Ancient City. Five Years of Krakow Archaeologists’ Research at the Paphos Agora on Cyprus (2011–2015). International Symposium and Exhibition of Photographs by Robert Słaboński, Krakow, 21–22 January 2016, 22–26, Krakow.
• Młynarczyk J. 1990. Nea Paphos 3. Nea Paphos in the Hellenistic Period. Warsaw.
• Neamtu C., Popescu D. and Mateescu R. 2011. From classical to 3D archaeology. Annales d’Université Valahia Targoviste. Section d’Archéologie et d’Histoire 13/1, 79–88.
• Newhard J. 2015. 3D imaging in Mediterranean archaeology: what are we doing, anyway? In B. R. Olson and W. R. Caraher (eds.), 9–16.
• Nicolaou K. 1980. Archaeological news from Cyprus 1977-1978. AJA 84, 70–71.
• Núñez A., Buill F. and Edo M. 2013. 3D model of the Can Sadurní cave. JAS 40/12, 4420–4428.
• Olson B. R. and Plachetti R. A. 2015. A discussion of the analytical benefits of image based modelling in archaeology. In B. R. Olson and W. R. Caraher (eds.), 17–26.
• Olson B. R. and Caraher W. R. (eds.) 2015. 3D Imaging in Mediterra- nean Archaeology. North Dakota.
• Padova M. D. de 2014. Fieldwork 3D interpretation: integrating established methods and emerging technologies in a medieval context. In W. Börner and S. Uhlir (eds.), CHNT 18. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies. Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.chnt.at/wp-content/uploads/DePadova_2014.pdf (status as of Dec. 31st, 2015).
• Papadakis G., Kourouppis S., Katsianis M. and Alexopoulos Y. 2014. Archaeological research in the digital age. In C. Papadopoulos et al. (eds.), 197–205.
• Papadopoulos C., Paliou E., Chrysanthi A., Kotoula E. and Sarris A. (eds.) 2014. Archaeological Research in the Digital Age. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Me- thods in Archaeology Greek Chapter (CAA–GR), Rethymno, Crete, 6–8 March 2014. Rethymno.
• Papuci-Władyka E. and Machowski W. 2015 (in press). PAPHOS AG ORA PROJECT. Preliminary results of the 2011–2012 seasons of the Jagiellonian University (Krakow, Poland) excavations. In C. Balandier (ed.), Nea Paphos, Fondation et développement urbain d’uneville chypriote de l’antiquité à nos jours. Études archéologiques, historiques et patrimoniales. Colloque international, Université d’Avignon 2012. Bordeaux.
• Papuci-Władyka E., Machowski W. and Miszk Ł. in collaboration with M. Biborski, J. Bodzek, A. Dobosz, M. Droste, M. Kajzer, E. Marzec, K. Nocoń, K. Rosińska-Balik and M. Wacławik forthcoming. Paphos Agora Project (PAP) 2011–2014: first preliminary report on excavations by Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland (with Appendix 1: Preliminary observations on animal remains from Krakow University excavations at the Agora of Nea Paphos by P. Croft). RDAC (New Series 2, 2015).
• Peterman G. L. 1992. Geographic information system: archaeology’s latest tool. The Biblical Archaeologist 55/3, 162–167.
• Pilides D., Hermon S., Amico N., Chamberlain M., D’Andrea A., Iannone G. and Ronzino P. 2010. The Hill of Agios Georgios, Nicosia: 3D analysis of an ongoing archaeological excavation. In J. F. Melero et al. (eds.), 325–328.
• Posluschny A., Lambers K. and Herzog I. (eds.) 2008. Layers of Perception. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Berlin, Germany, 2–6 April 2007. (Kolloquien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte 10). Bonn.
• Remondino F., Rizzi A., Jimenez Fernandez-Palacios B., Agugiaro G.,
• Baratti G. and Amicis R. de 2011. The Etruscan in 3D: from space to underground. Geoinformatics FCE CTU Journal 6, 283–290.
• Reu J. de, Plets G., Verhoeven G., Smedt P. de, Bats M., Cherretté B.,
• Maeyer W. de, Deconynck J., Herremans D., Laloo P., Meirvenne M. van and Clercq W. de 2013. Towards a three-dimensional cost- effective registration of archaeological heritage. JAS 40, 1108–1121.
• Reu J. de, Smedt P. de, Herremans D., Meirvenne M. van, Laloo P. and Clercq W. de 2014. On introducing an image-based 3D recon- struction method in archaeological excavation practice. JAS 41, 251–262.
• Ronzino P. 2010. Innovative techniques for 3d digital survey of the Paphos Theatre. In 24 FIG Congress 2010. Facing the Challenges – Building the Capacity, Sydney, Australia, 11–16 April 2010, 1–9.Retrieved from htpp://www.cng.it/CNG_NEW_SITE/internazionale/fig/DOCUMENTI/Relazione%20Geom.%20Ronzino,%20XXIV%20FIG%20International%20Congress,%20%Sydney%2011-16%20aprile%202010%20%20Commissioni%20FIG%20V%20e%2VI_145_187963ccffcc.pdf (status as of Dec. 31st, 2015).
• Sharon I., Dagan Y. and Tzionit G. 2004. The [awful?] truth about GIS and archaeology. In M. Iacovou (ed.), Archaeological Field Survey in Cyprus: Past History, Future Potentials, 151–162. (British School at Athens Studies 11). Athens.
• Stal C., Liefferinge K. van, Reu J. de, Docter R., Dierkens G., Maeyer P. de, Mortier S., Nuttens T., Pieters T., Eijnde F. van den, Put W. van de and Wulf A. de 2014. Integrating geomatics in archaeological research at the site of Thorikos (Greece). JAS 45, 112– 125.
• Torres J. A., Hernandez-Lopez D., Gonzalez-Aguilera D. and Hidalgo M. A. M. 2014. A hybrid measurement approach for ar- chaeological site modelling and monitoring: the case study of Mas D’Is, Penaguila. JAS 50, 475–483.
• Tsiafaki D. 2012. The contribution of new technologies in archaeology: goals and issues. In N. Zacharias (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium – Archaeological Research and New Technologies ARCH_ RNT, Kalamata, 21–23 October 2010, 2012, 93–98. Kalamata.
• Tsiafaki D. and Michailidou N. 2015. Benefits and problems through the application of 3D technologies in archaeology: recording, visualisation, representation and reconstruction. Scientific Culture 1/3, 37–45.
• Wong U., Morris A., Lea C., Lee J., Whittaker Ch., Garney B. and
• Whittaker R. 2011. Comparative evaluation of range sensing technologies for underground void modelling. In N. M. Amato (ed.), IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, 25–30 September 2011, 3816–3823. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssuejsp?punumber=6034548, (status as of Dec. 31st, 2015).

Identifiers

DOI

10.12797/SAAC.19.2015.19.10