CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS ACHIEVING

• Authors: Voichuk Maksym

Title variants

PL

ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚĆ SPOŁECZNA JAKO NARZĘDZIE DO OSIĄGNIĘCIA CELÓW ZRÓWNOWAŻONEGO ROZWOJU

• Languages of publication: EN PL

Abstracts

EN

The essence of the category of social responsibility of business, its evolution and trans-formation of approaches to education is defined. The role and importance of business social responsibility for sustainable development is analyzed. The models of implementation of CSR models in the national dimension, at the local and regional levels are considered.

PL

Zdefiniowano charakter kategorii odpowiedzialności społecznej w biznesie, jej rozwoju i transformacji podejść do formacji. Analizowana jest rola i znaczenie społecznej odpo-wiedzialności biznesu dla zrównoważonego rozwoju. Uwzględniono modele wdrażania modeli CSR w wymiarze krajowym, na poziomie lokalnym i regionalnym.

Keywords

EN

corporate social responsibility; sustainable development; spatial development; urban development

PL

społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu; zrównoważony rozwój; rozwój przestrzenny; urbanistyka.

• Publisher: Międzynarodowy Instytut Innowacji Nauka – Edukacja – Rozwój w Warszawie
• Journal: International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 8(2)
• Pages: 185-192

Dates

published

2018-12

Contributors

author

Voichuk Maksym

• Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University

References

• 1. Albareda L., et al. (2007). Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics. – 2007. – № 74. – Р. 391–407.
• 2. Bobrovska O.Yu., (2016). Rozvytok korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti – diievyi instrument pidvyshchennia yakosti i efektyvnosti mistsevoho samovriaduvan-nia (Development of Corporate Social Responsibility - An Effective Tool for Im-proving the Quality and Efficiency of Local Self-Government). Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia, Issue 1-2(1), p. 239-247
• 3. Bowen H.R., (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Row: N. Y.
• 4. Carroll A., (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate perfor-mance. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4(4), p. 500
• 5. Carroll А., (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Mora1 Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons. Vo1. 34, p. 39-48
• 6. COM(2011) 681 final
• 7. Davis К., (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities?. California Management Review. – Vo1. 2 (3), p. 71.
• 8. Frederick W.C., (1994). From CSR-1 to CSR-2: the maturing of business-and-soci-ety though
• 9. ISO 26000 (2010). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsi-bility.html
• 10. Kulieshova (2013). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist yak instrument staloho rozvytku pidpryiemstv (Corporate Social Responsibility as an Instrument for Sus-tainable Development of Enterprises), Visnyk Donbaskoi derzhavnoi mashyno-budivnoi akademii, Vol. 1, p. 195-199. [in Ukrainian].
• 11. Kytsyuk I., (2017). Main global trends in corporate social responsibility develop-ment and Ukrainian reality. Mechanisms of interaction between competitiveness and innovation in modern international economic relations: collective monograph / edited by M. Bezpartochnyi, in 4 Vol. / ISMA University. – Riga: «Landmark» SIA, Vol. 2, pp. 41–49.
• 12. McGuire J., (1963). Business and Society
• 13. UN (1999). UN Global Compact https://www.unglobalcompact.org/
• 14. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?sym-bol=A/42/427&Lang=E
• 15. Schwartz М., et al. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain ap-proach. Business Ethics Quarterly. Vo1. 13(4), p. 503-530.
• 16. Sethi S., (1975). Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytic Frame-work. California Management Review. Vol. 17, p. 58-64
• 17. Sokhatska O.M., (2007). Formuvannia novoi paradyhmy korporatyvnoho upravlin-nia v hlobalnomu seredovyshchi (Formation of a new paradigm of corporate gov-ernance in the global environment). Korporatsii ta intehrovani struktury: problemy nauky ta praktyky, Kh.: INZhEK, p. 75–97. [in Ukrainian].
• 18. Suprun N.A., (2013). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist yak chynnyk sotsi-alnoho zaluchennia (v konteksti tsilei stratehii “Europe-2020”) (Corporate social responsibility as a factor in social inclusion (in the context of the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy) Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Usoc_2013_2_14. [in Ukrainian].
• 19. Swanson D.L., (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corpo-rate social performance model. Academy of Management Reviewee. 20(1).
• 20. United Nations (1992) Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit Retrieved from http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html
• 21. United Nations (2000). Millennium Declaration Retrieved from http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm
• 22. Van der Putten F.P., (2005). A Research Agenda for International Corporate Social Responsibility Retrieved from //www.nyenrode .nl/down-load/NRG/workingpaperѕ/NRGO5-09.pdf

Identifiers

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0012.9936

ISSN

2450-2146

EISSN

2451-1064